Real application of lalkitab- iqbal and miglani ji

[Guest guest]

Miglani ji,

 

all members should be thankful to u as u took the pain

of scurtinising all the messages for 100% positive answers to

querries regarding horoscopes and opened our eyes.

bhatia ji titled his message as the REAL APPLICATION OF LALKITAB

where is the application of lakitab in it? questions prima facia

appear to be based on vedic or kp system like alphabet of name of

spouse. heart disease etc plus no upayas prescribed by lk method so

what do we understand. moreover remember the lady is a doctor.

doctor means above average qulaification rather top education. but

as per the question and her answer, how she managed to be a doctor

and that too in UK without good grades in education puzzles me.

doctors generally have bad handwriting so bad handwriting can be

attributed to writing in excess. but no good grades and average

studies/grdes defies the Dr. as the prefix before her name.

barsati rajwaha is a term used by revenue department people. it is

not a word of common parlance(particularly of ludhiana) and ladies

generally don't use these kind of words unless they are connected

with revenue proceedings.

secondly; surprise of surprises bhatia ji posts the real

application.... message in group and it comes on the

board without any objection ( a clear case of blind nepotism). so

much so when they have recently returned kalsi ji's request by

advising to look for the answers in the book itself. so nirmal ji

has knowledge of this real application and wants members to follow

with similar applications. may be he will give quotation from the

book later as he is busy. but as far my little knowledge permits;

such an application can be followed by 3 methods alone.

1. u get expertise in mind reading like we see in TV shows of david

blair etc. but remember for that the person should be at least in

eye contact with u.

2. u are expert in mook prshana sysytem.

3. take help of Iqbal, he is in the states and u have the alibi of

real ibn port address.

as far as real application of lk is concerned.

step1. pick up a strong planet and see if the indications( as given

in lk) of that planet are prevailing in the natives life.

step2. according to 35 sala chakra see which is the ruling planet.

check its placement in janam kundali and varshphal chart. check out

both for malefic and benefic indications and recommend a suitable

upaya.

step 3. if the native straight away tells about his problem. see as

to which planet it is associated with and after checking its

position in varshphal and natal pick up the cause of malefic

tendency and recommend its cure.

caution- always check whether the planet concerned is of pakka ghar

effect because for its upaya the modus operandi is totally different.

we don't move that planet but instead place a planet alongwith it or

break that planet into masnoi and then proceed. the masnoi part that

is defective can be removed or it can be combined with another

planet to alter its course and nature.

miglani ji, it is the pressure of this group acting like a watchdog

that objections have come to surface.

kulbirbains

 

, I <punjabilovebug

wrote:

>

> Dear Members,

>

> What Kulbir Ji said is a fact - nobody can question the evidence

he has presented.

>

> It is true that when Bhatia Ji was challenged openly and

directly in this forum he went into hiding over the debate and now

instead prefers to criticize those who showed the Lagna Sarini as

impotent. First it was Iqbal, then others who were to blame.

Eventually you can blame everyone, but at some point you have to

admit your own failures and move on.

>

> Recently I read a posting from some man in Boston claiming

Bhatia Ji drew his face before meeting him and how he didn't charge

him any money. Then Bhatia Ji wrote a follow-up explaining how he

had charged for services. This simple exchange is a fascinating

study in the human spirit and speaks volumes about those who

arranged for this promotional activity to take place in a Lal Kitab

forum of high regard.

>

> Who cares?! Not because of these inconsistencies in the

advertising strategy, but more so because has anyone's life

benefitted from the prescription of remedies or application of Lal

Kitab principles to their daily challenges or problems? That is the

substance of debate these individuals don't want to engage

themselves in, and rather distract the public through other pranks,

tactics and " fog and mirror " riddles.

>

> Yograj Ji walks a tightrope on these debates and I won't

question his intentions. He cannot defend the statements made about

Lagna Sarini, nor about its applications but instead wishes to

degrade the debate onto humanistic and personal friendship levels -

the exact antagonism of the original forum's charter and philosophy.

>

> In the spirit of advertising and in accordance with Mastercard's

branding, let me share the following components:

>

> Price of a Parantha in Boston: FREE

> Cheap Publicity in the LK Forum: FREE

> Watching a man hang onto his ego definately: PRICELESS

>

> With Best Regards,

> Iqbal

> USA

>

>

>

> Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar wrote:

> Dear Kulbir

>

> I was very glad and proud to see you actively participating in

some very useful discussions. I was thrilled to read the quality of

your questions in various forums. But I am somewhat disappointed to

see this message. It clearly shows that Arjun Ki Nazar Abhi Poori

Tarah Se Machhlee Kee Ankh Par Kendrit Nahee Huyee Hai. So using my

special rights over you, I request (not instruct) you to concentrate

on positive work only, and do not involve yourself in petty things.

>

> Further, please do not worry about me, I am mature enough and

would like to assure you that I will never be a part of any unholy

ploy and will never allow anyone to use me, because:

>

> Koyee sath naa de mera, chalna mujhe aata hai,

> Har aag sey waqif hoon, jalnaa mujhe aata hai.

>

> Last but not the least:

>

> Dilon mein dooriyaan sehney kee ta'ab rehney de,

> Hamare darmiyan koyi hijaab rehney de,

> Koyi to raabita qayam rahe mohabbat ka,

> Mera sawaal hi sun le jawab rehne de.

>

> God bless you always

> Yograj Prabhakar

>

>

> kulbirbains <kulbirbains wrote: respected moderators, i

am taking the liberty to post my message

> here as my messages in lalkitab group are banned but i am posting

> here because the matter under cosideration there belongs to this

> group but instead of replying here they want to play on their own

> turf keeping trouble shooters for them at bay. please approve if u

> find the matter relevant. more so when they attck any of our

members

> reputation there.

> may i ask bhatia ji , if he is not a member of this group how come

> he got to know about matters being discussed here. if he is a

member

> what stops him from interacting here?

> the latest message of bhatia ji has indirectly criticised the

> approach of pt. bhooshanpriya about his modus operandi in lalkitab-

> remedies group and shukla ji's postings in this group.

> about shukla ji's mention i want to ask is it his fault that he

> trusted prabhakar ji's translation of andhein and bachyei. bhatia

ji

> perhaps hasn't read the message which shukla ji wrote as soon as

he

> found the mistake and prabhakrji admitted it. it is a fit lesson

to

> shukla ji to give up his habit of trusting so called friends with

> eyes shut.

> second objection about pt bhooshanpriya. varun ji and tyagi ji

just

> check the feedbacks on his group lalkitab-remedies. do u think he

is

> giving remedies in reckless manner. i think he being a master of

> various branches of astrology is able enough to see if the problem

> of the native is according to the planatary configuration or not.

it

> is natural for people who live on false stories like lagn sarani

and

> blowing their trumpet about proximity to pt ji's family as a

> passport to fame in lk world to be jealous aout someone who is

> prescribing effective remedies that too for free. aren't we

> KRITAGHAN enough if instead of appreciating priya jis endeavour

for

> participating in this group and lakitab-remedies. we bear attacks

on

> him silently. i know he will never come forward in his defence as

he

> believes his actions speak louder than words but repceted

moderators

> scoundrels take silence for cowardice.

> i have nothing aginst prabhakar ji, i respect his knowledge but

did

> bhatia ji wrote even a word of appreciation about umesh ji, shukla

> ji upadhaya ji using this technique in that very group. now

suddenly

> he rises from his slumber and attacks shukla ji and bhoosahnpriya

> from behind the veil of prabhakar ji's praise. i know prabhakr

very

> well he is gentleman enough to not be part of these ploys. it is

> good that he is participating but tell me honestly without any

fear

> or bias. don't u see a streak of frustrated man in bhatia ji 's

> message who is playing politics to create a divide by praising one

> and attacking other.

> did he ever praise umesh, upadhaya ji, shukla ji in past. tewe ki

> darusti is not being done for the first time in this group and

just

> look how he is celebrating over it as if it is a new discovery. in

> fact he critised umesh by saying that umesh uses this technique to

> impress people by telling their past and present events.

> SHUKLA JI I THINK U DESERVED IT. TIME AND AGAIN I WARNED U BUT U

> SAID U KNOW BHATIA JI AND HIS FAMILY VERY WELL AND HE IS A

GENTLEMAN.

> tell me do gentlemen behave in this fashion. he went into hiding

> over lagn sarani debate more so when iqbal openly challenged him

for

> wrong calculations and now grabs the opportunity to defame those

who

> proved sarani wrong. not on facts but behind prabhakr ji's praise.

> shukla ji tell me is priya's group very recent as to he didn't

know

> about bhooshanpriya's modus operandi. is prabhakr ji's darusti a

> recent trend. had umesh urself upadhaya ji and many others not

> followed it much earlier. did bhatia ji always followed it. what

is

> the reason of jumping the line now.

> shukla ji respect individuals for their past record BUT PLEASE

DON'T

> BE A DOORMAT UPON WHOM THEY DUST THEIR FEET WHENEVER THEY PLEASE.

> kulbir

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>