Thakur sahib : budh of members

[Guest guest]

Thakur ji;

 

after going through archives of lalkitab groups I find

weight in Kulbir ji's statement. Just think so much time has elapsed

since gutka was published by prabhakar ji's team and mistakes are

being pointed out now by Kulbir ji. Means that the persons who

published the book did no care to read it once. If the have read

gutka like we read gutkas daily or at least referred regularly; they

too could have noticed the mistakes.

 

It was Kulbir who pointed mistakes at the launch; despite being

shoed down by Bhatia ji and lobby he is still doing the job. Varun

ji is proving an excellent guide to him and all of us by correcting

the errors. Why should they refer to prabhakr ji; as u say he is a

member of this forum; being the publisher he should come up with

clarification at the first instance. Why does he need a special

addressal. If he lax, let others do his job.

 

Plus please practice before u preach. Contribute yourself at their

level and then u will automatically attain the right to be their

guide.

 

Is it true that u have Rahu in house no 12 as said by Kulbir ji?

regarding kulbir's budh i feel Varun ji and lalkitabee ji are his

brahspat and your gooself is Rahu. so please don't spoil his budh.

 

Sincerely,

 

gurpal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " kulbir bance "

<kulbirbance wrote:

>

> Thakur ji; aap apna lagna chart dekhein usme *rahu 12 me hoga*; jo

wyakti ko

> bhramit kar jagat guru ya yun kaho jan kalyan ka suthradhar hone ki

> khushfahmi paida karat hai. bhai ji aap ne is disha me ab tak kya

kiya hai.

> hum to apne apne budh ke mutabik haath pair martye rahte hain. par

janab ki

> ab tok koi khas contribution nahin dikhi, siwai updesh dene ke.

apne rahu

> -12 ko thik karo phir aouron ke budh ko dekhna.* sirf* *apne

doston se

> bachne ke liye false id ka sahar lete ho;* apne wastwik swarup me

apni baat

> kahni ki himmat to aap me hain nahin; phir aap kahte ho " apne

group ki baat

> nahin kaatte " . ab aapka group bada ya lalkitab ;pehle yeh faisla

kar lo;

> Varun; Shukla ji (aapke liye sirf kitabi) ko lalkitab ke jis manch

par lana

> chahe; unhe laana meri zimewari; par wah manch lalkitab ki pragati

ke liye

> ho;

> mil to sabhi sakte hain par jo pehle thekedari liye baithein hain

woh

> doosron ko apne level par rakhte nahin aur unka level jante hue

unke peeche

> lagna hame gwara nahin.

> phir se haath jod kar prarthna hai ki false id ka natak chodo apne

waswtik

> swarup me aao; apni jati dostion se uppar uthkar lalkitab ki baat

karo.

> respectfully

> kulbirbance

>

> On 3/18/08, Iqbal Chand Thakur <thakur.iqbalchand wrote:

> >

> > dear Varun Bhai, Kulbir Bhai aur Kitabi bhai

> > Aapki aur Prabhaker jee ki mail dekh kar lag raha hai kee aap ek

doojey ko

> > acchhi trahaan se jaantey ho.Aap kaa baat baat mein Prabhakar

jee key

> > gutkey ke baarey mein bajaye prabhakar jee kay kisi aur se

clearification

> > lena ajeeb saa lagta hai, jab kee prabhakar jee hamarey is group

ke member

> > hain.

> > Yoon lagta hai kee yeh kitaab ko bechnay kee

> > koyi sochi samjhi tarteeb hai. Yeh Raakhi saawant ka style

(surkhiyon mein

> > baney rehna ) ik academic group ke theek nahin lagta. Baaqi aap

ki marji.

> > aap padhey likhey aur suljhay dimaad waaley wyaqti hain hain.

> > Aap sabhi apnay aap ko lalkitabi kehtey ho, Kya yeh naush

farmaaney kee

> > koshish karengay kee ye kis grah kee kartoot kee wajah se ho

raha hai. Mere

> > khyaal mein aap apnay varshphal ya tevay ko dekhain.

> > Aap sabhi kaa budh kisi galat ghar mein baitha hoga aur prabal

hoga..

> > Kyaa hee achha hota agar aap sabhi log mil kar jo, Hindi kee

1942 aur 1952

> > waali kitabein shuru se padh rahey ho un ki galtiyon ko darust

kar key sabhi

> > logon keliya prastut karein.

> > .

> > Aapka

> > Iqbal Chand Thakur

> >

> > On 3/18/08, kulbirbance <kulbirbance wrote:

> > >

> > > Varun ji,

> > >

> > > page 62 line 11 of prabhakar ji's gutka says

> > > PEHLE BANI PRALBHAT, PEECHE BANA SHARIR; Please check if the

word

> > > praLbad is same in the original or is it prarbad. what could

praLbhat

> > > mean.

> > >

> > > sincerely

> > >

> > > kulbirbance

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

>