Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Correction 1941 gutka another mistake / kulbir bhai

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Kulbir bhai,

 

There is no mistake the word printed is 'tanoor'. Pandit ji has used

this word very often through out in the gutka for 'tandoor'.

 

Have a nice day

 

Varun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " kulbirbance "

<kulbirbance wrote:

>

> Dear members; please note prabhakar ji's gutka line 7 page 125 has

> TANUR SHUKAR (MITTI) JAB TAPAYA.......

> It is wrongly printed the exacT word should be TANDOOR.

> KULBIRBANCE

> , " kulbirbance "

> <kulbirbance@> wrote:

> >

> > varun ji;

> >

> > if murabba and marlaj was the only one mistake then we

> > could have acepted nirmal ji's views that they had a lot of

> > discission during proof reading but after so many mistakes being

> > brought forward for everyone to see; this is a limp excuse. do

me

> se

> > ik baat hai 1. discusion hui hi nahin ya 2. discusion karne wale

> > nalayak the aur khushfahmi ka shikar bhi jo kissi urdu ke vidwan

ko

> > refer nahin kiya.

> >

> > kulbirbance

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , " lalkitabee "

> > <lalkitabee@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected Nirmal Ji

> > > Again u r on mistake. Sabse pehley to yah baat dekhne ki hai ki

> > Urdu

> > > main " MURABBA " kaise likha jataa hai. Kisi bhi nazariye se

> > lalkitab main

> > > page 111 line # 11 of word 'Marlaj' ko proof reading ke

dauraan

> > > " Murabba " main tabdeel karne ka kyaa haq hai aapko?Jabki Pujya

> > Pandit ji

> > > ne aisa likha hee nahee. Aap aur prabhaker ji aur anya experts

jo

> > ki is

> > > kitaab ke logics par bhi charchaa karnaa galat samajhtey they

aur

> > > hoo-ba-hoo ise sweekar karne ki vaqaalat kartey they to aap

logon

> > ne

> > > khud hee is word ko tabdeel karne ki himaaqat kyon kee? Ab is

> baat

> > ki

> > > kyaa guarantee hai ki aapne URDU KEE ORIGINAL kitaab se aur

koyee

> > > chhed-chhad nahi ki hai. Reliabilty to aapne khatm hee kar

> > dee.Aaj agar

> > > is tarah galatiyaan dhyaan main na laayee jaatee to aap log aam

> > readers

> > > ko bevkoof banaa rahey they.Jaisa likhaa tha vaisaa hee chhaap

> > > detey.Kyaa harz tha ismain.

> > > Chalo khair ab aap logon ne proof reading kartey huve

> agar

> > ise

> > > apni samajh ke mutabik Mangal Nek kee pehchaan ke taur par iska

> > matlab

> > > Chaukor (Square) ya square hand hee liyaa hai ,to yah aur bhi

> mitti

> > > paleet kar dee hai ,arth ka anarth kar daalaa hai. Itne urdu

> navees

> > > milkar bhi is line ke poorey maksad ko samajh nahi paaye aur

> tabad

> > tod

> > > main " marlaz " se " Murabba " bana diyaa. Sahi main is line ke

> matlab

> > kaa

> > > hee murabba banaa daalaa aapne.

> > > Nirmal Ji Line hai :-- SHANI KE GHAR YE RAJAA CHEETA,MARD

> > MAGAR NAHI

> > > MAARTA HAI .

> > > HONT BAAZOO YA

> MUNH

> > KA

> > > DAHAANA, HAATH MARLAJ HOTAA HAI.

> > > Nirmal ji gaur se poorey chapter ko padhtey to khud ba khud

pataa

> > lag

> > > jaataa ki mangal nek main bhi SURAJ AUR BUDH hotey hain aur

budh

> > ise

> > > chakkar detaa hai to mandaa mangal ho jaata hai. Matlab Mangal=

> > > masnuyee Sooraj+ Budh bhi hotaa hai aur yah shani ke ghar main

> > insaan ko

> > > apni neki ke taur par jaan se to nahi maartaa lekin hath

bejaan

> kar

> > > saktaa hai , jabki shani ke ghar main yah pakke ghar ki

vrishchik

> > rashi

> > > ka hotaa hai.

> > > Aaap jaraa ab apne isi gutkey ke Page 125 main Mangal

khana

> > 8 ki

> > > heading main khud hee padh lain-- aap logon ne hee saaf

tarzumaa

> > kiyaa

> > > hai ki - " GRAHFAL KA, JAB MANGAL BAD HO. BAJUON KE BAGAIR BAAQI

> > JISM "

> > > Iske alawaa aap 1942 ke URDU EDITION ke page no.165 main line

no

> > 15 main

> > > bhi isi baat ko MANGAL NEK khana 8 main padh saktey hain.Mangal

> > > shastradhari ya nek ka chapter hone ka yah matlab nahi ki aap

> > samajh na

> > > aane par usmain MANGAL NEK ki pehchaan ya ashiyaa ko fer-badal

> kar

> > > highlight kartey huve apne tarike se hee apni baat ko ORIGINAL

> > LALKITAB

> > > ke hissey ke taur par sabit karne lag jaayain.Fir bhi aap

logon

> ne

> > yah

> > > kyon kiyaa.

> > > Itnaa khulaasaa karne ke baad bhi agar

aapko

> > meri

> > > likhi baat ka koyee hissa samajh naa aaye to main aapko vah

hissa

> > fir

> > > explain kar doonga, line ke ooper neechey aur aagey peechhey ki

> > sair

> > > karvane ki koshish kabhi nahi karoongaa.

> > > Ab to aapki nazar main saaf ho jaana chahiye ki Pujya Pandit

Ji

> ne

> > us

> > > line main ise Mangal nek ki pehchaan ke taur par nahi liyaa,

> balki

> > aap

> > > logon ne hee lalkitab main apnaa urdu gyaan dhakkey se daal

diyaa

> > aur

> > > Murabba chatnee tayyar karne lag gaye ,ya fir aapne bhi koyee

> > DALDA book

> > > ko hee kuchh roop badal kar copy kar diya. Kyaa mere yaar ek

> > galati ko

> > > chhupane ke liye 10 tukkey lagaa rahey ho.Prabhakar ji bhi itne

> > > samajhdaar hokar kuchh nahi bol rahey. Arrey yah koyee jaroori

> > thodey he

> > > hai ki ek insaan jo urdu padh saktaa ho vah iske roop ko

badalkar

> > durust

> > > hee kar rahaa hogaa. Galat bhi to kar saktaa hai. Baaqi aap

khud

> > > samajhdaar hain. Main apne aapko rok nahi sakaa. Yah dhoka

mujhse

> > > bardaasht nahi hua . Koyee baat buri lagi ho to muafi chahtaa

> hoon.

> > > aapkaa Shubhchintak

> > > Pt. Lalkitabee

> > > , " varun_trvd "

> > > <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respected members,

> > > >

> > > > I have received the following communication from respected

> Nirmal

> > > > Kumar Bhardwaj ji :

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Varun Trivedi

> > > >

> > > > Respected Lalkitabi Ji Varun ji, & Kulbir Ji,

> > > >

> > > > The errors pointing out by you is welcome. I admit that

these

> are

> > > > the errors left during proof reading. I will try to make it

> > possible

> > > > to send these corrections to all the purchasers. The errors

are

> > form

> > > > my end hence regretted.

> > > > This is regarding the error pointed out by Varun ji,

> > > > on page 111 line # 11 of word 'Murabba'.

> > > > the word indeed is 'murabba' not 'marlaj' . A lot of

> dsicussions

> > > > were held during proof reading to decide the correct word.

on

> the

> > > > first instance it seems that it is marlaz. As you explained

> that

> > > > there may be meaning of Marlaj as Dheela Dhala. burt the

Mangal

> > nek

> > > > has nothing to with Dheela Dhala. Mangal nek is Policeman,

Army

> > Man

> > > > hence Dheela pan is not his nature.

> > > > The correct word is Murrabba which in urdu means Square.

> > > > Haath Murrabba means Square Hand. In punjab the area(square

> > unit) is

> > > > also be called as murrabba. Square is the symbol of Mangal

Nek.

> > > > Hence square hand also represent mangal nek.

> > > > Regards

> > > > Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj

> > > > PS. Please send the copy of errors at nirbhar@ I shall be

> > > > obliged.

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...