Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Sun + Mars + Mercury + Saturn

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Varun ji sir,

 

As you have pointed out, quoting the Book, that Saturn if with two male

planets will get neutralised. But in this combination saturn in spite

of being with two male planets sun and mars it doesnt seem to get

neutralised because the Arun Sanhita says ' phata patang charon ka

manda phal us ghar ka jis mein charon baithe hon'.

Could you please explain this anamoly?

 

Sincerely,

 

Narendra Juneja

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respected Juneja ji,

 

It is true that the results of this combination are in a way malefic.

If the planets are strong then the Book says that such a person will be

rich through the money he has looted from others. This has to be

understood through the Masnuyee resultants of this combination. Sun and

Saturn together form an ashubh mars, where as mars and mercury form a

Saturn of rahu's nature. Thus the combination ends up as mars and

Saturn which has been described in the book as ` do dakoo ek hi usool

ke'.

 

Another result stated is that the person will be brave and able to face

many people alone. This could be possible if we take the masnuyee

resultants : sun and mercury forming shubh mars ; and saturn and mars

forming a rahu.

 

As far as Saturn getting neutralized in the company of two male

planets, we believe, in this case Saturn doesn't get weakened because

of mercury in the combination.In other words because of mercury the

saturn retains its malefic influence.

 

Regards,

 

Varun Trivedi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " junejanarendra "

<junejanarendra wrote:

>

> Varun ji sir,

>

> As you have pointed out, quoting the Book, that Saturn if with two

male

> planets will get neutralised. But in this combination saturn in spite

> of being with two male planets sun and mars it doesnt seem to get

> neutralised because the Arun Sanhita says ' phata patang charon ka

> manda phal us ghar ka jis mein charon baithe hon'.

> Could you please explain this anamoly?

>

> Sincerely,

>

> Narendra Juneja

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...