Guest guest Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 Dear all, I just joined this group. I am fairly well versed in regular astrology. I am interested in learning Lal kitab. I went through the files section, it was helpful. I have a question. Is the chart for Lal kitab same as the chart cast for vedic astology Thank you Gurushanker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Respected Gurushanker ji, Yes, the Lal Kitab chart is the same as that of traditional Vedic astrology. Since the Lal Kitab paddhati is based on Bhava [khana], it is the Bhava [ house ] which is given the importance over the Rasi. Regards, Varun Trivedi , " guruparamacharya " <guruparamacharya wrote: > > Dear all, > > I just joined this group. I am fairly well versed in regular astrology. I am interested in learning Lal kitab. I went through the files section, it was helpful. I have a question. Is the chart for Lal kitab same as the chart cast for vedic astology > > Thank you > Gurushanker > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Gurushanker ji, the horoscope remains the same. The only change is rashi is ignored and chart build according to bhava. To say every horoscope is assummed to start by mesh lagan. Regards. Kulbir. On 6/4/09, guruparamacharya <guruparamacharya wrote: > Dear all, > > I just joined this group. I am fairly well versed in regular astrology. I am > interested in learning Lal kitab. I went through the files section, it was > helpful. I have a question. Is the chart for Lal kitab same as the chart > cast for vedic astology > > Thank you > Gurushanker > > -- Sent from my mobile device Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Varunji and Kulbirji, Thank you very much for the reply. So if in natal chart the lagna is makara, jupiter in 3rd, for Lalkitab we consider jupiter in 12th. Please let me know whether my understanding is right Thank you Regards Gurushanker , kulbir bance <kulbirbance wrote: > > Gurushanker ji, > > the horoscope remains the same. The only change is > rashi is ignored and chart build according to bhava. To say every > horoscope is assummed to start by mesh lagan. > > Regards. > > Kulbir. > > > On 6/4/09, guruparamacharya <guruparamacharya wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I just joined this group. I am fairly well versed in regular astrology. I am > > interested in learning Lal kitab. I went through the files section, it was > > helpful. I have a question. Is the chart for Lal kitab same as the chart > > cast for vedic astology > > > > Thank you > > Gurushanker > > > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Sir, lagan is makar, jupiter is in meen rashi; house no 3. In lalkitab method lagan will become mesh or house no.1. Jupiter will remain in house no.3 but in mithun. Regards. Kulbir. On 6/13/09, guruparamacharya <guruparamacharya wrote: > Varunji and Kulbirji, > > Thank you very much for the reply. So if in natal chart the lagna is makara, > jupiter in 3rd, for Lalkitab we consider jupiter in 12th. Please let me know > whether my understanding is right > > Thank you > > Regards > Gurushanker > > > , kulbir bance <kulbirbance > wrote: >> >> Gurushanker ji, >> >> the horoscope remains the same. The only change is >> rashi is ignored and chart build according to bhava. To say every >> horoscope is assummed to start by mesh lagan. >> >> Regards. >> >> Kulbir. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 6/4/09, guruparamacharya <guruparamacharya wrote: >> > Dear all, >> > >> > I just joined this group. I am fairly well versed in regular astrology. >> > I am >> > interested in learning Lal kitab. I went through the files section, it >> > was >> > helpful. I have a question. Is the chart for Lal kitab same as the chart >> > cast for vedic astology >> > >> > Thank you >> > Gurushanker >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Sent from my mobile device >> > > > -- Sent from my mobile device Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Kulbirji, Thank you so much for the clarification. Regards, Gurshanker , kulbir bance <kulbirbance wrote: > > Sir, > > lagan is makar, jupiter is in meen rashi; house no 3. In lalkitab > method lagan will become mesh or house no.1. Jupiter will remain in > house no.3 but in mithun. > > Regards. > > > Kulbir. > > > > On 6/13/09, guruparamacharya <guruparamacharya wrote: > > Varunji and Kulbirji, > > > > Thank you very much for the reply. So if in natal chart the lagna is makara, > > jupiter in 3rd, for Lalkitab we consider jupiter in 12th. Please let me know > > whether my understanding is right > > > > Thank you > > > > Regards > > Gurushanker > > > > > > , kulbir bance <kulbirbance@> > > wrote: > >> > >> Gurushanker ji, > >> > >> the horoscope remains the same. The only change is > >> rashi is ignored and chart build according to bhava. To say every > >> horoscope is assummed to start by mesh lagan. > >> > >> Regards. > >> > >> Kulbir. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 6/4/09, guruparamacharya <guruparamacharya@> wrote: > >> > Dear all, > >> > > >> > I just joined this group. I am fairly well versed in regular astrology. > >> > I am > >> > interested in learning Lal kitab. I went through the files section, it > >> > was > >> > helpful. I have a question. Is the chart for Lal kitab same as the chart > >> > cast for vedic astology > >> > > >> > Thank you > >> > Gurushanker > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> Sent from my mobile device > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.