Mistake in Faisala Kundali-Umesh Ji - The goal

[Guest guest]

Res Umesh Ji

Mere shabdon ka yahi matlab hai ki aapke antarman main bhi vahi manthan-prakriya

chal rahi hai jo mere man main hai.Aur aap bhi use pooraa karne main lagey huve

hain, aap bhi yahi chaah rahey hain ki is aakhiri kundali aur dhokey ke grah ki

paheli ko samjhain, lekin meri tarah aapne mukhar shabdon main iskee galati ko

kabhi bhi nahi kahaa, lekin man main to sanshay aapke bhi hai aur is sanshay ko

door karne ke liye aap bhi is vishay ke antim sheersh tak pahunchnaa chahtey

hai,Hum dono hee iske liye praayassheel hain yahee vah GOAL hai ki agar yah

galati hai to kis aadhar par hai aur nahi hai to kyon nahi hai.Aur is Manthan-

prakriyaa ki aadat ka jo rujhaan aksar mujhey aap main nazar aayaa hai uskee

vazah se main aap jaise saathi ko prapt kar garvaanvit hun.

Bus yahi merey shabdon ka aashay hai- English main is baat ko saaraansh kar

likh diyaa, shayd yahi galati ho gayee.

With Regards

Pt.lalkitabee

V.Shukla

With Regards

Pt.Lalkitabee , " Umesh Sharma "

<mudit982001 wrote:

>

>

> Respected Lalkitabee ji,

>

> I feel when any member give his comment or go for discussion on your

> write up and arise the doubts you take that personally and always you

> try to give a new turn to subject and try to prove to others that the

> person who arises the doubts has personal enmity with you. It shows very

> crystal clear in your mail. " At last-- U r not confused, u r determined

> to ur goals " this sentence in your mail prove my words. I think it is

> not a way of healthy discussion. Are you clarifying what are my goals?

>

> You wrote so many objections in your mail but you do not write a single

> word that how I am wrong and you are right about " Dhokey Ka Grah " . I

> accept that my method, which I follow, is wrong but what is correct and

> how? Can you clear it?

>

> If you say that Pt. ji mention or by other mistake " Venus " as Dhokey Ka

> Grah is wrong I agreed but if you raise this doubt than it is your duty

> to clarify what is correct and how?

>

>

>

> I request you do not take any thing personally, come and give us the

> right direction to understand the lalkitab's method. We all are seeing

> you very hopefully. I am especially.

>

>

> Thanks & Regards

>

>

> Umesh Sharma

>

[Guest guest]

Respected Lalkitabee ji,

 

Aap jantey hi hain ki meri english bahut jayada achi nahin hain, esiliye shayad

samjhane main galti ho gayi aur main baat ko anytha le gaya. main tahe dil se

aap se apne shabdon ke liye kshama chahta hoon. Aap meri kshma prarthna swikaar

karai.

 

Respect & Regards

 

 

Umesh Sharma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " lalkitabee " <lalkitabee wrote:

>

> Res Umesh Ji

> Mere shabdon ka yahi matlab hai ki aapke antarman main bhi vahi

manthan-prakriya chal rahi hai jo mere man main hai.Aur aap bhi use pooraa karne

main lagey huve hain, aap bhi yahi chaah rahey hain ki is aakhiri kundali aur

dhokey ke grah ki paheli ko samjhain, lekin meri tarah aapne mukhar shabdon main

iskee galati ko kabhi bhi nahi kahaa, lekin man main to sanshay aapke bhi hai

aur is sanshay ko door karne ke liye aap bhi is vishay ke antim sheersh tak

pahunchnaa chahtey hai,Hum dono hee iske liye praayassheel hain yahee vah GOAL

hai ki agar yah galati hai to kis aadhar par hai aur nahi hai to kyon nahi

hai.Aur is Manthan- prakriyaa ki aadat ka jo rujhaan aksar mujhey aap main nazar

aayaa hai uskee vazah se main aap jaise saathi ko prapt kar garvaanvit hun.

> Bus yahi merey shabdon ka aashay hai- English main is baat ko saaraansh kar

likh diyaa, shayd yahi galati ho gayee.

> With Regards

> Pt.lalkitabee

> V.Shukla

> With Regards

> Pt.Lalkitabee , " Umesh Sharma "

<mudit982001@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Respected Lalkitabee ji,

> >

> > I feel when any member give his comment or go for discussion on your

> > write up and arise the doubts you take that personally and always you

> > try to give a new turn to subject and try to prove to others that the

> > person who arises the doubts has personal enmity with you. It shows very

> > crystal clear in your mail. " At last-- U r not confused, u r determined

> > to ur goals " this sentence in your mail prove my words. I think it is

> > not a way of healthy discussion. Are you clarifying what are my goals?

> >

> > You wrote so many objections in your mail but you do not write a single

> > word that how I am wrong and you are right about " Dhokey Ka Grah " . I

> > accept that my method, which I follow, is wrong but what is correct and

> > how? Can you clear it?

> >

> > If you say that Pt. ji mention or by other mistake " Venus " as Dhokey Ka

> > Grah is wrong I agreed but if you raise this doubt than it is your duty

> > to clarify what is correct and how?

> >

> >

> >

> > I request you do not take any thing personally, come and give us the

> > right direction to understand the lalkitab's method. We all are seeing

> > you very hopefully. I am especially.

> >

> >

> > Thanks & Regards

> >

> >

> > Umesh Sharma

> >

>