Guest guest Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Dear Varun ji; i need urgent help; Prabhakar ji's gutka on page 360 mentions the date of birth time; 11-5-1898, time 05:43 pm; Tuesday but it comes to be wednesday; Goswami ji's 1942 book mentions the same date on page 89 as 10-5-1898; Tuesday; that is correct; the great confusion both mention 11-5-1941 as starting point of 44th year;11-9-1941 as starting point of 5th month. Kindly tell what are the correct dates; there is definitely some misprint rather misprints. Regards kulbir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2009 Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 Dear Kulbir bhai, 1941 original urdu ed page 360 mentions: 11-5-98 mangalvar 5-43 baje shaam 1942 original urdu edition page 89 mentions 10-5-98 mangalvar 5-43 baje shaam Therefore both the transliterations are true to the original urdu script. The printing mistake is in the 1941 urdu edition The Kundali published in both the books is of May 10th and NOT of May 11th. If you notice the moon and rahu will be together in the 3rd house only on the 10th May,1898. On the May11, 1898 the moon goes forward by a day and is placed in the 4th house. Since the kundali given in both the books is of May 10th,1898, therefore the date of birth should be taken to be May10th 1898, Tuesday. For all subsequent kundalis the date of birth should be taken accordingly to be 10th May. There is a printing mistake of the date in the 1941 urdu edition. It should be 10th may. The Varshphal and month start date should also be 10th May instead of 11th May, or 11th September. The date of birth,day of birth and kundali is correct in the 1942 urdu edition. Have a nice day Varun Trivedi , "kulbir" <kulbirbains wrote:>> Dear Varun ji;> > > i need urgent help;> > Prabhakar ji's gutka on page 360 mentions the date of birth time; 11-5-1898, time 05:43 pm; Tuesday but it comes to be wednesday;> > Goswami ji's 1942 book mentions the same date on page 89 as 10-5-1898; Tuesday; that is correct;> > the great confusion both mention 11-5-1941 as starting point of 44th year;11-9-1941 as starting point of 5th month.> > Kindly tell what are the correct dates; there is definitely some misprint rather misprints.> > Regards> > kulbir> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2009 Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 Thanks Bhai ji; The branch knows the tree is firmly rooted out there to seek constant support ; and the tree is more than willing to help. Regards Kulbir. , " varun_trvd " <varun_trvd wrote: > > > Dear Kulbir bhai, > > > > 1941 original urdu ed page 360 mentions: > > > > 11-5-98 mangalvar 5-43 baje shaam > > > > 1942 original urdu edition page 89 mentions > > > > 10-5-98 mangalvar 5-43 baje shaam > > > > Therefore both the transliterations are true to the original urdu > script. > > > > The printing mistake is in the 1941 urdu edition > > > > The Kundali published in both the books is of May 10th and NOT of May > 11th. > > > > If you notice the moon and rahu will be together in the 3rd house only > on the 10th May,1898. > > > > On the May11, 1898 the moon goes forward by a day and is placed in the > 4th house. > > > > Since the kundali given in both the books is of May 10th,1898, therefore > the date of birth should be taken to be May10th 1898, Tuesday. > > > > For all subsequent kundalis the date of birth should be taken > accordingly to be 10th May. > > > > There is a printing mistake of the date in the 1941 urdu edition. It > should be 10th may. > > > > The Varshphal and month start date should also be 10th May instead of > 11th May, or 11th September. > > > > The date of birth,day of birth and kundali is correct in the 1942 urdu > edition. > > > > Have a nice day > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " kulbir " <kulbirbains@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Varun ji; > > > > > > i need urgent help; > > > > Prabhakar ji's gutka on page 360 mentions the date of birth time; > 11-5-1898, time 05:43 pm; Tuesday but it comes to be wednesday; > > > > Goswami ji's 1942 book mentions the same date on page 89 as 10-5-1898; > Tuesday; that is correct; > > > > the great confusion both mention 11-5-1941 as starting point of 44th > year;11-9-1941 as starting point of 5th month. > > > > Kindly tell what are the correct dates; there is definitely some > misprint rather misprints. > > > > Regards > > > > kulbir > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.