Guest guest Posted June 2, 2005 Report Share Posted June 2, 2005 Dear Shri.Raichur, TW: I have included extra information that you wanted in the Topkar study and uploaded the new file (Topkar.doc). Please feel free to let me know if you need more work to be done. Regards, Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2005 Report Share Posted June 3, 2005 Dear Rangarajan Thanks for the study. The revelation that the 1st TEST of sex agrees only in 51/56 % cases not promising. OF 175 records that failed, even if we exclude the 70 which required correction by one minute or less, 105 records will have failed. 42% failure. I consider this as Birth times given are upto a Minute only . So a variation of 1 min. could be acceptable in results. But even 42 % failure makes the Method not acceptable. So we have to continue our search for a better method of Rectification Good LuckRangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Dear Sir, I am attaching the WORD doc as per your request. Regards, Rangarajan - anant raichur Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy Thursday, June 02, 2005 8:35 PM Re: Updated Topkar Study Dear Raangarajan I am unable to view the TOPKAR.DOC file from the files section. Please sent it as an attachment to my personal mail. sorry to trouble you good LuckRangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Dear Shri.Raichur, TW:I have included extra information that you wanted in the Topkar study and uploaded the new file (Topkar.doc).Please feel free to let me know if you need more work to be done.Regards,Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2005 Report Share Posted June 4, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, 1. Many thanks. Both the Rule and TOBs of AA records or Bhatt's charts are fixed terms. To test fixed term by another fixed one, one of them should be assumed correct. If the Rule is assumed corrcet, TOBs of AA records or Bhatt's charts appear incorrect. If TOBs of AA records or Bhatt's charts are assumed correct, the Rule seems incorrect. In fact, it is not known which one is correct. That is why by widening time deviation BOTs are assumed as a variable term. If the Rule is rejecting BOTs of different time deviations more or less by the same rate,i.e. not creazy for accuracy of time deviation, of course the Rule is skewed to rejection. 2. Moreover, the basic assumptions are not realistic, the Rule seems unreliable. Thanks and best regards, tw , " Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy " <ranga@m...> wrote: > Dear Shri.Raichur, TW: > I have included extra information that you wanted in the Topkar study > and uploaded the new file (Topkar.doc). > > Please feel free to let me know if you need more work to be done. > > Regards, > Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.