To: Clasification of Cathergory, an Opinion NOT an Adivse, Thanks for Reply

August 20, 2005

With my Sincere Respect to all members,the Veterans in the foram,

and Thank you the reply from Anant Raicuur ji,tw853 ji, Rama ji,the

Moderator Punit Pandey ji.

The Reson for the proposal was,Internet is Global and its pubilc we

have people from varioues countries from beginers to intermidiate

levels, Advance level and etc.So this need to be handle in a very

much

Organised way which i think.

Quality is better than Quaterty,and i think we have members more

than 700 weather they are active or unavtive which i dont know.

The participation in the foram, i can see only limited

members,correct me if iam wrong.so the the Moderator in this area

need to rectify them as active members(AM)or non active member(NAM)

All members to clasify for themself first under which group they

belong.

we have astrologers by profession and others may have as a hobby.

it may be delegated to the right respective person of the

particular group concern.(an opinion only)for any Qurey.

May be my prediction could be wrong to say that Super Advance Level

SORRY,Why i mention the word as TELEPATY is a book which i have

read on THE STAR AT DAWN written by a Malaysian Astrologer name

S.T.ARASU he was a student of Guruji KSK,and i understood from the

book that Guruji at times he Meditate

let say a new member would like to join our group,we know that

Internet is vast as an ocean.we MAY hve at times the good and the bad

it may be screen to some exten on telepathy by any one fron our

group.this is only a very statement.

The above is only a suggestion an opnion, i am just a learner here

i would be very much appreciate, and looking forward upon my

respected veterans in this field for theire Help.

Regards

P.R.Selvam

August 20, 2005

Dear Selvam and Group,

1. I have not yet participated in this discussion of moderation

policy because in my opinion Punit is doing a good job and I'm

grateful to him and the Group for giving the oportunity to learn KP

practically and contribute something for the lovely spirit of Guruji

KSK.

2. As mentioned before, it's just a crazy hobby for me to be a KP

learner especially after buying KP six Readers in KL, Malaysia in

Jan 1984 for US $110 eqivalent.

3. In my personal opinion any proposal should be simple and

practical without giving any more burden to the moderator. Your

view " how about if it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not

be healthy " is worthy to note.

4. Practically there is not much prospect for some more KP groups

in the coming years. I tried to demonstrate some development in KP

like New Ayanamsa, ORB theory in two purely KP SWs with appropriate

example charts in other two Vedic groups but no interest. The same

thing with Tarun's reposting of Msg#5571 in our group as an another

KP view in other two Vedic groups. I used to visit other astro

groups including Astrlogia group in Polish. Another KP group was

formed for some months and at present there is another KP group

which I have not yet visited as a member.

5. There is no doubt that meditation will help a lot in making

judgement of prediction but it may not be related to the moderation.

Regards,

tw

, " P.R.Selvam " <selvam_prs>

wrote:

>

> With my Sincere Respect to all members,the Veterans in the foram,

> and Thank you the reply from Anant Raicuur ji,tw853 ji, Rama

ji,the

> Moderator Punit Pandey ji.

> The Reson for the proposal was,Internet is Global and its pubilc

we

> have people from varioues countries from beginers to

intermidiate

> levels, Advance level and etc.So this need to be handle in a very

> much

> Organised way which i think.

>

> Quality is better than Quaterty,and i think we have members more

> than 700 weather they are active or unavtive which i dont know.

>

> The participation in the foram, i can see only limited

> members,correct me if iam wrong.so the the Moderator in this area

> need to rectify them as active members(AM)or non active member(NAM)

>

> All members to clasify for themself first under which group they

> belong.

>

> we have astrologers by profession and others may have as a hobby.

> it may be delegated to the right respective person of the

> particular group concern.(an opinion only)for any Qurey.

>

> May be my prediction could be wrong to say that Super Advance

Level

> SORRY,Why i mention the word as TELEPATY is a book which i have

> read on THE STAR AT DAWN written by a Malaysian Astrologer name

> S.T.ARASU he was a student of Guruji KSK,and i understood from

the

> book that Guruji at times he Meditate

>

> let say a new member would like to join our group,we know that

> Internet is vast as an ocean.we MAY hve at times the good and the

bad

> it may be screen to some exten on telepathy by any one fron our

> group.this is only a very statement.

>

> The above is only a suggestion an opnion, i am just a learner

here

>

> i would be very much appreciate, and looking forward upon my

> respected veterans in this field for theire Help.

>

> Regards

>

> P.R.Selvam

August 20, 2005

Dear Friends,

I had the privelege to read many of the interesting proposals on

classification of " astrologers " for reasons yet mysterious to me.

Any classification however well intended would be restrictive in

principle and practice.You could also include another group

called 'also ran', where I would like to be.

These thoughts of classification would be appropriate, where there

are a large number of aspirants and few seats, like joining an

elitist club.If a survey of " active " members of this group is

taken,the list would classify around 30. The rest have joined the

group for a specific purpose(s),having obtained their

requirements,have either quit/ remained as dormant.

In my opinion, would any classification of this group ,constituting

>95%, serve any useful purpose,assuming you get feedback?.For the

balance active 30,classification would not bear much meaning,in light

of Mr Raichur's self classification, after >30 years experience.

Life is pleasant as it is now.

Best regards,

Satish

-- In , " tw853 " <tw853> wrote:

> Dear Selvam and Group,

>

> 1. I have not yet participated in this discussion of moderation

> policy because in my opinion Punit is doing a good job and I'm

> grateful to him and the Group for giving the oportunity to learn KP

> practically and contribute something for the lovely spirit of

Guruji

> KSK.

>

> 2. As mentioned before, it's just a crazy hobby for me to be a KP

> learner especially after buying KP six Readers in KL, Malaysia in

> Jan 1984 for US $110 eqivalent.

>

> 3. In my personal opinion any proposal should be simple and

> practical without giving any more burden to the moderator. Your

> view " how about if it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may

not

> be healthy " is worthy to note.

>

> 4. Practically there is not much prospect for some more KP groups

> in the coming years. I tried to demonstrate some development in KP

> like New Ayanamsa, ORB theory in two purely KP SWs with appropriate

> example charts in other two Vedic groups but no interest. The same

> thing with Tarun's reposting of Msg#5571 in our group as an another

> KP view in other two Vedic groups. I used to visit other astro

> groups including Astrlogia group in Polish. Another KP group was

> formed for some months and at present there is another KP group

> which I have not yet visited as a member.

>

> 5. There is no doubt that meditation will help a lot in making

> judgement of prediction but it may not be related to the

moderation.

>

> Regards,

>

> tw

>

> , " P.R.Selvam " <selvam_prs>

> wrote:

> >

> > With my Sincere Respect to all members,the Veterans in the foram,

> > and Thank you the reply from Anant Raicuur ji,tw853 ji, Rama

> ji,the

> > Moderator Punit Pandey ji.

> > The Reson for the proposal was,Internet is Global and its pubilc

> we

> > have people from varioues countries from beginers to

> intermidiate

> > levels, Advance level and etc.So this need to be handle in a very

> > much

> > Organised way which i think.

> >

> > Quality is better than Quaterty,and i think we have members

more

> > than 700 weather they are active or unavtive which i dont know.

> >

> > The participation in the foram, i can see only limited

> > members,correct me if iam wrong.so the the Moderator in this area

> > need to rectify them as active members(AM)or non active member

(NAM)

> >

> > All members to clasify for themself first under which group they

> > belong.

> >

> > we have astrologers by profession and others may have as a

hobby.

> > it may be delegated to the right respective person of the

> > particular group concern.(an opinion only)for any Qurey.

> >

> > May be my prediction could be wrong to say that Super Advance

> Level

> > SORRY,Why i mention the word as TELEPATY is a book which i have

> > read on THE STAR AT DAWN written by a Malaysian Astrologer name

> > S.T.ARASU he was a student of Guruji KSK,and i understood from

> the

> > book that Guruji at times he Meditate

> >

> > let say a new member would like to join our group,we know that

> > Internet is vast as an ocean.we MAY hve at times the good and the

> bad

> > it may be screen to some exten on telepathy by any one fron our

> > group.this is only a very statement.

> >

> > The above is only a suggestion an opnion, i am just a learner

> here

> >

> > i would be very much appreciate, and looking forward upon my

> > respected veterans in this field for theire Help.

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > P.R.Selvam

August 20, 2005

Dar friends,

There are many ideas forthcoming on classifying members in to beginners, intermediary and advanced levels etc. Who has to classify and based on what. is it based on articles and predictions posted in this forum or based on astrological qualification from recognized institution. There are 700 members in this forum and we see hardly less than 20 participating actively and enthusiastically. May be many of them are professional with vast expeirence. Initially when i joined there were many topics that were useful for the beginners to learn though intermediary level persons could refresh from the postings. If some one or few with knowledge who can classify the past postings and figure it out who are all really contributing to this art of astrology and form an opinion as to how members can be classified will prove to be fruitful.

Then what for this classification is required and is there going to be restriction of persons who have not contributed or participated in any discussion wish to participate in future.

Most importantly why all these classification. If it is due to remarks passed on any member by any person the moderator or a group marked by moderator can warn the erring member so that unpleasant things can be put to an end. I would request all the members to ignore as an individual remarks and are not of the group approval.

Any forum has members of likes and dislikes and opinion differs. Consensus on matters like astrology is never obtained excepting on the broader sense taht we can see in the past postings. There were for and against of an opinion or argument. Hence i feel it is better to continue this group as such with a vow by individuls not to offend others in whatsoever it is. These are my humble opinion and there are stalwarts over there to decide what is good for the group.

regards

vijay