Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report Share Posted August 29, 2005 Dear Punit ji, With all my Respect to you, i would like to propose the above, as not an advise but an opinoin only. As you have been doing a very GOOD job,and i sincerelly didnt denied it.A little bit of a kind consideration, is requried to Review the Active and the Non Active Members. Reasons as stated below. 1) Totl Members 768, Particpants are less than 30,please correct me if i am wrong,It is pointless to have a large numbers,without any participation and it may reflect a bad inpression,when a new member to join our group,either as a beginer,intermidiate or advance level. I belive this is Devine Science,should be respected,with Sciencerity. Your kind consideration is higly appreciated on the above,and to all our members. Regards P.R.Selvam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report Share Posted August 29, 2005 Selvam ji, It is the nature of the online forums and I am not sure what advantage we will get by classifying members (which is indeed a time taking process). There are many members who just read the posts of senior astrologers to learn KP system (I myself do that sometimes when I don't have much time to participate). Why shouldn't we allow them to do this? Can you elaborate how is it leading to bad impression and how it is disrespect of divine science? Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey On 8/29/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs wrote: Dear Punit ji, With all my Respect to you, i would like to proposethe above, as not an advise but an opinoin only. As you have been doing a very GOOD job,and i sincerelly didnt deniedit.A little bit of a kind consideration, is requried to Review theActive and the Non Active Members. Reasons as stated below.1) Totl Members 768, Particpants are less than 30,please correct me if i am wrong,It is pointless to have a large numbers,without anyparticipation and it may reflect a bad inpression,when a new memberto join our group,either as a beginer,intermidiate or advance level. I belive this is Devine Science,should be respected,with Sciencerity.Your kind consideration is higly appreciated on the above,and to allour members. RegardsP.R.Selvam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report Share Posted August 29, 2005 Dear Selvam, I agree with Punit on this. People join a forum to learn and contribute to the learning of others. If there are many members in our forum but only a few are actively participating, there can be many reasons. One of this is, as Punit correctly said, to learn from senior members. There is nothing wrong with that. One can't force everyone to participate. If the group promotes free discussion and has something interesting, many will participate. I think the current form could continue (minus the fighting!) Regards, Rangarajan , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > Selvam ji, > It is the nature of the online forums and I am not sure what advantage we > will get by classifying members (which is indeed a time taking process). > There are many members who just read the posts of senior astrologers to > learn KP system (I myself do that sometimes when I don't have much time to > participate). Why shouldn't we allow them to do this? Can you elaborate how > is it leading to bad impression and how it is disrespect of divine science? > Thanks & Regards, > Punit Pandey > > On 8/29/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, With all my Respect to you, i would like to propose > > the above, as not an advise but an opinoin only. > > > > As you have been doing a very GOOD job,and i sincerelly didnt denied > > it.A little bit of a kind consideration, is requried to Review the > > Active and the Non Active Members. Reasons as stated below. > > > > 1) Totl Members 768, Particpants are less than 30,please correct me > > if i am wrong,It is pointless to have a large numbers,without any > > participation and it may reflect a bad inpression,when a new member > > to join our group,either as a beginer,intermidiate or advance level. > > > > I belive this is Devine Science,should be respected,with > > Sciencerity. > > > > Your kind consideration is higly appreciated on the above,and to all > > our members. > > > > Regards > > > > P.R.Selvam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report Share Posted August 29, 2005 I agree I am a member of the Vedic Group. I read it to keep myself in touch with the matters being discussed. Mangal Dosha for example is one. good luck Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Dear Selvam,I agree with Punit on this. People join a forum to learn and contribute to the learning of others. If there are many members in our forum but only a few are actively participating, there can be many reasons. One of this is, as Punit correctly said, to learn from senior members. There is nothing wrong with that. One can't force everyone to participate. If the group promotes free discussion and has something interesting, many will participate.I think the current form could continue (minus the fighting!)Regards,Rangarajan , Punit Pandey wrote:> Selvam ji,> It is the nature of the online forums and I am not sure what advantage we > will get by classifying members (which is indeed a time taking process). > There are many members who just read the posts of senior astrologers to > learn KP system (I myself do that sometimes when I don't have much time to > participate). Why shouldn't we allow them to do this? Can you elaborate how > is it leading to bad impression and how it is disrespect of divine science? > Thanks & Regards,> Punit Pandey> > On 8/29/05, P.R.Selvam wrote: > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, With all my Respect to you, i would like to propose> > the above, as not an advise but an opinoin only.> > > > As you have been doing a very GOOD job,and i sincerelly didnt denied> > it.A little bit of a kind consideration, is requried to Review the> > Active and the Non Active Members. Reasons as stated below.> > > > 1) Totl Members 768, Particpants are less than 30,please correct me> > if i am wrong,It is pointless to have a large numbers,without any> > participation and it may reflect a bad inpression,when a new member> > to join our group,either as a beginer,intermidiate or advance level.> > > > I belive this is Devine Science,should be respected,with> > Sciencerity.> > > > Your kind consideration is higly appreciated on the above,and to all> > our members.> > > > Regards> > > > P.R.Selvam> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.