Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

To.Punit Pandey , Poropsal for Revitalisation of Avtive and Non Active Members

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Punit ji, With all my Respect to you, i would like to propose

the above, as not an advise but an opinoin only.

 

As you have been doing a very GOOD job,and i sincerelly didnt denied

it.A little bit of a kind consideration, is requried to Review the

Active and the Non Active Members. Reasons as stated below.

 

1) Totl Members 768, Particpants are less than 30,please correct me

if i am wrong,It is pointless to have a large numbers,without any

participation and it may reflect a bad inpression,when a new member

to join our group,either as a beginer,intermidiate or advance level.

 

I belive this is Devine Science,should be respected,with

Sciencerity.

 

Your kind consideration is higly appreciated on the above,and to all

our members.

 

Regards

 

P.R.Selvam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Selvam ji,

 

It is the nature of the online forums and I am not sure what advantage we will get by classifying members (which is indeed a time taking process). There are many members who just read the posts of senior astrologers to learn KP system (I myself do that sometimes when I don't have much time to participate). Why shouldn't we allow them to do this? Can you elaborate how is it leading to bad impression and how it is disrespect of divine science?

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 8/29/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs wrote:

Dear Punit ji, With all my Respect to you, i would like to proposethe above, as not an advise but an opinoin only.

As you have been doing a very GOOD job,and i sincerelly didnt deniedit.A little bit of a kind consideration, is requried to Review theActive and the Non Active Members. Reasons as stated below.1) Totl Members 768, Particpants are less than 30,please correct me

if i am wrong,It is pointless to have a large numbers,without anyparticipation and it may reflect a bad inpression,when a new memberto join our group,either as a beginer,intermidiate or advance level.

I belive this is Devine Science,should be respected,with Sciencerity.Your kind consideration is higly appreciated on the above,and to allour members. RegardsP.R.Selvam

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Selvam,

I agree with Punit on this. People join a forum to learn and

contribute to the learning of others. If there are many members in

our forum but only a few are actively participating, there can be

many reasons. One of this is, as Punit correctly said, to learn from

senior members. There is nothing wrong with that. One can't force

everyone to participate. If the group promotes free discussion and

has something interesting, many will participate.

 

I think the current form could continue (minus the fighting!)

 

Regards,

Rangarajan

 

, Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote:

> Selvam ji,

> It is the nature of the online forums and I am not sure what

advantage we

> will get by classifying members (which is indeed a time taking

process).

> There are many members who just read the posts of senior

astrologers to

> learn KP system (I myself do that sometimes when I don't have much

time to

> participate). Why shouldn't we allow them to do this? Can you

elaborate how

> is it leading to bad impression and how it is disrespect of divine

science?

> Thanks & Regards,

> Punit Pandey

>

> On 8/29/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear Punit ji, With all my Respect to you, i would like to

propose

> > the above, as not an advise but an opinoin only.

> >

> > As you have been doing a very GOOD job,and i sincerelly didnt

denied

> > it.A little bit of a kind consideration, is requried to Review

the

> > Active and the Non Active Members. Reasons as stated below.

> >

> > 1) Totl Members 768, Particpants are less than 30,please correct

me

> > if i am wrong,It is pointless to have a large numbers,without any

> > participation and it may reflect a bad inpression,when a new

member

> > to join our group,either as a beginer,intermidiate or advance

level.

> >

> > I belive this is Devine Science,should be respected,with

> > Sciencerity.

> >

> > Your kind consideration is higly appreciated on the above,and to

all

> > our members.

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > P.R.Selvam

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree

 

I am a member of the Vedic Group. I read it to keep myself in touch with the

 

matters being discussed. Mangal Dosha for example is one.

 

good luck

Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote:

Dear Selvam,I agree with Punit on this. People join a forum to learn and contribute to the learning of others. If there are many members in our forum but only a few are actively participating, there can be many reasons. One of this is, as Punit correctly said, to learn from senior members. There is nothing wrong with that. One can't force everyone to participate. If the group promotes free discussion and has something interesting, many will participate.I think the current form could continue (minus the fighting!)Regards,Rangarajan , Punit Pandey wrote:> Selvam ji,> It is the nature of the online forums and I am not sure what advantage we > will get by classifying members (which is indeed a time taking process). > There are many members who just read

the posts of senior astrologers to > learn KP system (I myself do that sometimes when I don't have much time to > participate). Why shouldn't we allow them to do this? Can you elaborate how > is it leading to bad impression and how it is disrespect of divine science? > Thanks & Regards,> Punit Pandey> > On 8/29/05, P.R.Selvam wrote: > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, With all my Respect to you, i would like to propose> > the above, as not an advise but an opinoin only.> > > > As you have been doing a very GOOD job,and i sincerelly didnt denied> > it.A little bit of a kind consideration, is requried to Review the> > Active and the Non Active Members. Reasons as stated below.> > > > 1) Totl Members 768, Particpants are less than 30,please correct me> > if i am wrong,It is pointless to

have a large numbers,without any> > participation and it may reflect a bad inpression,when a new member> > to join our group,either as a beginer,intermidiate or advance level.> > > > I belive this is Devine Science,should be respected,with> > Sciencerity.> > > > Your kind consideration is higly appreciated on the above,and to all> > our members.> > > > Regards> > > > P.R.Selvam> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...