Guest guest Posted September 11, 2005 Report Share Posted September 11, 2005 Dear friends, Following case is taken from another site kphansvedic gives a good example. Girl 27 October 1983 15:45 Ahmedabad. The girl was engaged to marry an American in USA but the engagement broke and she came back India heart-broken. Here 7th sublord is Mercury. Mercury is in star of RAHU and Sub of RAHU. Under control of Rahu. Rahu in 3rd show engagement as well as parting or walking away. But Mer also in Rahu sub. Rahu represents and signfies Mars and Venus.[Rahu is Taraus and star of Mars] Both Mars and Venus just at 7th cusp but fallen 2* short of 7th cusp in 7th Rasi are in actual 6th house. So they denied her marriage. Mercury a duel rresult planet will again give similar conditions in future but will not allow her to marry as Sat, the dasa lord starting for her now,is in Rahu star and Mercury sub. However, she can live happily with her partner without marriage.That is how I interpret it. Inder , anant raichur <anant_1608> wrote: > Dear Shree Parag > > In Astrology No rule is 100 percent valid at all times. There are exceptions to almost all > > rules. So one has to go by his own experiences and decide how and where to apply a > > rule. > > Good luck > > > parag_m_g <parag_m_g> wrote: > Shreee Anantjee, > I had given one horoscope in this forum for discussion about > foreign journey. In that horoscope every planet is in next sign & > earlier bhava. Lagna being Scorpio at the end(29 degrees & some > minutes). But some planets in his life have given results of both > houses. Whereas some planets have given results of only one > house,where they are deposited. > And yes it doesnt match with what somebody argued here that if the > planet is nearer to next house then only the person get results of > next house etc. > Also about Punarpoo, in the same case Saturn is in sub of Moon > (10th). But he got very good results whenever he had saturn bhukti > etc. > According to many old-timers KP Practitioners, punarpoo is > considered only when saturn & moon are opposite to each other i.e. > having 7th aspects. > Again coming back to Planet in one house & another sign, Saturn in > third house, 4th sign gave results of 4th not because its in 4th sign > (thats what I feel) but because its in Jupiter star & jupiter is > owner of 4th house which is empty. Whereas Mercury in 12th, jupiter > in 8th always gave results of 12th & 8th inspite of being deposited > in good(positive) sign,star & sub. > Please go thru the archives & lets see whether past events match > with your analysis. Myself is confused & thats why I raised this > querry, I hope you understand. > Parag. > > -- In , anant raichur > wrote: > > Dear Shree Parag > > > > No use discussing this. Get a Chart, where this situation arises, > and find out for yourself > > > > what the Planet does in its Dasa. > > > > good luck > > > > > > parag_m_g > wrote: > > But many astrologers argue that in such cases, Planet do give > > results of the sign it owns i.e. Jupiter in 8th Bhava, 9th sign > will > > give results of 9th also, but only occasionally in Jataka's life. > > And they feel that they have found it with practical experience > > during last more than 25 years. But I am not sure whether > > Krishnmurthi Guruji mentioned it anywhere. > > Please discuss, > > Parag. > > > > -- In , " Inder " wrote: > > > Dear Parag, > > > I donot think that there is any confusion here. > > > Planet in any bhava is to give result of that bhava irrespective > of > > > sign it is in. Suppose Jupiter is in 9th bhava but it is in 10th > > > sign then we have to see only 9th house signfication of Jupiter > not > > > of 10th. If you consider it would give wrong results. > > > Inder > > > > > > , Sunil Joshi > > > wrote: > > > > Parag, > > > > I am a follower of 4 step theory of Mr.S.Gondhalekar > > > > and we consider the planet giving results of the next > > > > house if the Bhavarambh(i.e.beginning of the next > > > > house)is within 3'20 " of the next house even if the > > > > same is in the earlier house.(and may be in a > > > > different sign)It gives correct results. > > > > with regards, > > > > Sunil D.Joshi. > > > > > > > > --- parag_m_g > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yes thats why I had this querry. Because nowhere > > > > > it is mentioned By > > > > > Guruji(I suppose). But many practioners after years > > > > > of experience > > > > > claim that planet in one house & another sign(i.e. > > > > > adjacent house > > > > > most of the times)gives results of both houses, but > > > > > everybody is > > > > > confused( & varied opinions) upto what extent? > > > > > Ofcourse one method of > > > > > deciding is taking into account Sub too! But in > > > > > different Dashas for > > > > > different persons results vary. So one cant fix any > > > > > criterion in such > > > > > case. > > > > > Parag. > > > > > > > > > > , anant raichur > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Parag > > > > > > I do not know wether KSK has stated this > > > > > specifically. > > > > > > When we find Significators of a House We consider > > > > > the PLANETS IN > > > > > THE HOUSE, and also > > > > > > LORD of the Sign of the House cusp. > > > > > > > > > > > > When we consolidate this to know which house A > > > > > Planet Signifies, we > > > > > consider the HOUSE > > > > > > in which it Resides, and also the Houses it > > > > > Rules(by sign). > > > > > > > > > > > > So a planet will signify both. The degee of > > > > > significance is not the > > > > > same. > > > > > > > > > > > > good Luck > > > > > > > > > > > > parag_m_g > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Has KP categorically mentioned anywhere that > > > > > planet in one house & > > > > > > another sign gives results of both houses? i.e. > > > > > for example Mars in > > > > > 9th > > > > > > house & 10th sign will give results of both 9th & > > > > > 10th? > > > > > > Because many KP astrologers follow this theory > > > > > that during its > > > > > > Dasha,Antra & bhukti it can give results of both > > > > > houses because it > > > > > > occupies one house & another sign. > > > > > > Does it holds true? What is the experience of > > > > > eminent KP > > > > > Practioners > > > > > > here? Can somebody elaborate? > > > > > > Parag. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.