Guest guest Posted December 11, 1999 Report Share Posted December 11, 1999 Hello, Juan, and welcome to the list. In a message dated 99-12-11 12:27:13 EST, you write: > I have tried many of the sidereal techniques, but most of the time they > didn't work " as advertised " . As for now, I use regularly the sidereal > returns and the paranatellontas, and am looking forward to learn how to use > and interpret the other techniques which, although have not worked well for > me, I want to learn better how to use them properly from people who have > the experience. Which techniques did you try, and how did they fail? I've heard of tropicalists who correct for precession -- which is great! -- but what's a " parantellonta " ? (I've heard of parans, so I'm assuming this may involve them.) Later, Kevin/Baraka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 1999 Report Share Posted December 11, 1999 Hello! I am 42, a professional astrologer or rather, astro-psychologist, and my favorite hobby is astronomical computing (making ephemerides and that stuff). I have been involved in astrology since 1974. I live in Costa Rica, and the astrological literature that one can get without asking it by mail is scanty. But for many years you could buy the " American Astrology " magazine, so I was fortunate to learn a great deal of astrology from there. Many of the writers in that magazine were siderealists, from whom I learned many things. Some of them I think are among the best astrological thinkers there are, such as Jim Erickson and Clay Reed, to name the ones I remember now. I have tried many of the sidereal techniques, but most of the time they didn't work " as advertised " . As for now, I use regularly the sidereal returns and the paranatellontas, and am looking forward to learn how to use and interpret the other techniques which, although have not worked well for me, I want to learn better how to use them properly from people who have the experience. I feel --I believe-- that sidereal astrology is closer to " truth " , and I am tuned to it, although I am a tropicalist, not a siderealist. Bu I always work with precession-corrected transits and with sidereal returns (which I would like to learn how to interpret better). I have written a freeware program named " Riyal " which I think can be useful or interesting to some of you. It displays the sidereal (Fagan/Bradley) longitudes together with the tropical, for any date from 5000 BC to 9000 AD. The accuracy and the source of the calculations is fully documented. The program also gives a list of all the paranatellontas, and although it uses tropical positions, it calculates all transits, progressions, solar arcs, etc., with the " bija " correction by default, i.e., it uses the sidereal reference frame for all time calculations. It is a full-featured program, very compact and fast, made for DOS, designed to work with all the known centaurs (Chiron, Pholus, Nessus...) and some other new slow-moving minor planets. But this can be disabled and it can work with the regular planets only. The program can be found here: http://www.expreso.co.cr/centaurs/riyal.html-ssi I value greatly being a member of this list. Juan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.