Guest guest Posted October 23, 2001 Report Share Posted October 23, 2001 I agree there is something to be learned from the outer planets. But if they represent something that is brand new in our collective consciousness, then we probably will not understand the impact of these planets for awhile. The original seven we have more experience with. Another thing, I have heard that astronomers are now finding all sorts of planetoids in the outer regions of the solar system, making me question why we are giving so much importance to Pluto, who is arguably not a true planet. There are many things that can enter our consciousness. When too many things do that, it gets confusing. That is why I have recently limited myself to the traditional seven. But who knows where my studies will lead in the future? I still don't mind hearing what other people are learning about these distant deities. Would also like to hear more of what Cayce has to say about astrology. Did he use the sidereal zodiac or the tropical zodiac? I am curious. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ David Ray Woodstock, NY 12498 bluerodent ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ----Original Message Follows---- hillaryous Re: Uranus, Neptune, Pluto Tue, 23 Oct 2001 19:17:47 -0000 Edgar Cayce says we should use the Persian (vedic) system because it is more accurate, and that we SHOULD include the outer planets. Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto encompass Psychic, Mysticism, and Consciousness, respectively. Cayce says it is symbolic that we have only recently discovered these planets, because it is only recently that we are becoming more aware and conscious of these areas of ourselves. _______________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.