Guest guest Posted September 13, 2002 Report Share Posted September 13, 2002 In a message dated 9/13/2002 5:39:36 PM Central Daylight Time, katejasmine writes: > My name is Katie and I'm interested in hearing about > how anyone or everybody came to become interested in Sidereal vs. > Tropical astrology. Katie: What a nice opening! I have always been a gambler, an optimist. A bit pompous and self-righteous, and always caring what others thought about me. I am generous if not foolheary with money which i spend freely and could care less about tomorrow. I am so optimistic that i am always sure that everyone will be at their appointed posts, be it for a date or a casual meeting; if the plane is to take off at 3PM and i am 50 miles away at 2PM i am sure i will make the flight. What's my sign? Sagittarius, of course. Sidereal of course. /// thanks. chris wing in austin tx. Oh, and chartwise, both my mars and venus are in their opposite signs (mars in taurus, venus in scorpio) and angular at the horizon (venus asc) needless to say i am very artistic but with no discipline and with no romance to speak well of! This is fine with me because while foolish to the nth degree i am no fool when it comes to avoiding confrontations which, too-true, result in disaster for all! Thus i remain a pacifist just to keep on the safe side. With 5 degrees scorpio asc and thus square Regulus at 5Leo it would follow that i am short of stature. I am. You will note throughout history that leaders with sun or moon or asc at 5Leo are small-framed. It is definitely a zodiacal degree that bears up extremely well in research. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2002 Report Share Posted September 14, 2002 Dear Siderealists, Hello, everybody! My name is Katie and I'm interested in hearing about how anyone or everybody came to become interested in Sidereal vs. Tropical astrology. In my case, I got tired of hearing how interested I should be (Tropically speaking) in politics and the acquisition of " power, " as my tropical midheaven would suggest, and began searching for a more accurate description of myself. Sidereal astrology does seem more accurate, and I look forward to reading about your collective experiences of greater (or not!) natal accuracy using SIdereal or Tropical astrology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2002 Report Share Posted September 14, 2002 Hi Katie and welcome to the (western)sidereal chat room. In my own case, what attracted me to Sidereal Astrology, besides the obvious astronomical considerations is the BIG difference in approaches to interpretation. Personally I first consider which planets are angular. In Sidereal Astrology the planets are considered primarily in terms of their intrinsic symbolic nature (Benefics, Malefics, Neutrals) and the aspects are considered neither good or bad (as tropicalists might say)squares & oppositions are 'active' trines and sextiles 'passive'. Anyway after considerding the planetary aspects and especially angular aspects, I then read these aspects in terms of their Constellational Context. Siderealists do not use 'house rulers' for example: a Tropicalist might say that " Aries rules the 1st house which is the nature of Mars and therefore the planet Venus is in the 1st House, and is there fore debilitated " This creates more useless complication and confusion. Venus in the 1st house (sidereally) would show an essential Venusian approach to life, the native being a culturally refined peace loving individual .(unless, of course, the Malefics, Mars and/or Saturn were strongly aspected to Venus). One Sidereal Astrologer's Viewpoint...good luck with your research Mike Viele --- katejasmine wrote: > Dear Siderealists, > Hello, everybody! My name is Katie and I'm > interested in hearing about > how anyone or everybody came to become interested in > Sidereal vs. > Tropical astrology. In my case, I got tired of > hearing how interested I > should be (Tropically speaking) in politics and the > acquisition of > " power, " as my tropical midheaven would suggest, > and began searching > for a more accurate description of myself. Sidereal > astrology does seem > more accurate, and I look forward to reading about > your collective > experiences of greater (or not!) natal accuracy > using SIdereal or > Tropical astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > News - Today's headlines http://news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.