Guest guest Posted December 18, 2002 Report Share Posted December 18, 2002 In a message dated 12/17/2002 7:43:29 PM Central Standard Time, DRStarman2001 writes: > Well, one can always hope that snotty responses are not the level of > discussion for an Internet group; we'll have to see if this sort of asinine > > insulting of people is the norm here WHO ARE YOU, and WHAT do you mean INSULTING . . . ASININE . . . ? And since when does being " an internet group " signify anything but its name? You're the one who came into the SIDEREAL GROUP with the latest umpteen systems crap as if we've never heard it all a million times before. You have yet to exhibit a speck of humor. and you expect people on this list to sit idly by while you surreptitiously insult us with your condescending attitude, " brilliant " dissertations, and impeccable english grammar and vocabulary? YOU are the person who was so insulted when others in this list responded to so much hogwash in your posts early this week (was it only yesterday? or the 16th). So why don't you have a laugh (at yourself) and see the AD HOMINEM [sic] in your own ignorance of what it means to join a sidereal group list. We like the western sidereal system. Most of us use it exclusively and those who do not are rarely argumentative about it; I think they're here because they're lovers of the art. But every once in a while, some fathead from ancient babble-onia jumps into the group and starts slinging the same old crap . . . then these same babble-onians get all weepy and parsimonious when someone in the group tells them " no thanks - butt out. " I am NEVER embarrassed by ANY degrogatory remark hurled my way by tropical astrologers. I'm only embarrassed for them, and piqued by the gall of their nerve for calling my science black. I repeat my earlier opening: THIS IS A SIDEREAL GROUP. We'd LOVE to hear your latest stroke of brilliance vis a vis the sidereal system of Fagan/Bradley et al; but of course you have none. After all, it is in their memory (also Gleadow, Brigadere Firebrace, Mary Austin, John Mazurek et al) that MOST of us continue on this path. Otherwise . . . we've heard it all vis a vis the following systems: tropical, bagelonian [sic], eminemic [sic], hypothermorphic [sic], transylvishnu [sic] and stupidcalefragalisticexpialidocious [sic] (i may have missed feznusian [sic]). So in all seriosity [sic] - - - since we've heard it all before -- and you've apparently known it all for EVER: Shaddup [sic]. Nobody cares if anybody's righter than right . . . but curiouser and curiouser? Maybe. Myself . . . I've run into so many of you that i've nearly run out of retorts (with the present posting being a retort of last resort I might add). I didn't join this group to be insulted simply by informing a post-er (poser) (you) that this is a sidereal group, so one should not be surprised if one's tropical blahblahs are belittled. Actually, your posts remind me of every-other tropicalist i've ever met; it's not a pretty memory and i don't appreciate being sucked back in time -- especially whilst enjoying a Sidereal discussion loop -- by any such as you, so please save your admonitions for somebody else. (And please don't review my current post using a grammarian or book of style; there is no book of style for my kinda [sic] prose.) This is a SIDEREAL GROUP and if you wanna [sic] argue here please accept my crocodile tears. Sign me . . . snotty, immature, poorly-bred, asinine, moronic or whatever pleases you. //// Chris Paul Wing /// Age 58.99 /// siderealist since 1968 /// Austin Texas /// P.S. If any of our long-standing posters find this-here [sic] post inappropriate, y'all [sic] please whisper amongst yourselves. I don' [sic] care! PS PS -- not coincidentally, my current lunar return of 12/15/02 has mars/venus libra asc opp natal moon, with jupiter in mc cancer opp neptune. Needless to say, this is perfect weather for arguing. But as always, the blunder is ever-ready here. Believe it or not everyone, I am a pacifist! /// cw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2002 Report Share Posted December 18, 2002 CHRIS IS MY GOD!!!! cpwing44 wrote:In a message dated 12/17/2002 7:43:29 PM Central Standard Time, DRStarman2001 writes: > Well, one can always hope that snotty responses are not the level of > discussion for an Internet group; we'll have to see if this sort of asinine > > insulting of people is the norm here WHO ARE YOU, and WHAT do you mean INSULTING . . . ASININE . . . ? And since when does being " an internet group " signify anything but its name? You're the one who came into the SIDEREAL GROUP with the latest umpteen systems crap as if we've never heard it all a million times before. You have yet to exhibit a speck of humor. and you expect people on this list to sit idly by while you surreptitiously insult us with your condescending attitude, " brilliant " dissertations, and impeccable english grammar and vocabulary? YOU are the person who was so insulted when others in this list responded to so much hogwash in your posts early this week (was it only yesterday? or the 16th). So why don't you have a laugh (at yourself) and see the AD HOMINEM [sic] in your own ignorance of what it means to join a sidereal group list. We like the western sidereal system. Most of us use it exclusively and those who do not are rarely argumentative about it; I think they're here because they're lovers of the art. But every once in a while, some fathead from ancient babble-onia jumps into the group and starts slinging the same old crap . . . then these same babble-onians get all weepy and parsimonious when someone in the group tells them " no thanks - butt out. " I am NEVER embarrassed by ANY degrogatory remark hurled my way by tropical astrologers. I'm only embarrassed for them, and piqued by the gall of their nerve for calling my science black. I repeat my earlier opening: THIS IS A SIDEREAL GROUP. We'd LOVE to hear your latest stroke of brilliance vis a vis the sidereal system of Fagan/Bradley et al; but of course you have none. After all, it is in their memory (also Gleadow, Brigadere Firebrace, Mary Austin, John Mazurek et al) that MOST of us continue on this path. Otherwise . . . we've heard it all vis a vis the following systems: tropical, bagelonian [sic], eminemic [sic], hypothermorphic [sic], transylvishnu [sic] and stupidcalefragalisticexpialidocious [sic] (i may have missed feznusian [sic]). So in all seriosity [sic] - - - since we've heard it all before -- and you've apparently known it all for EVER: Shaddup [sic]. Nobody cares if anybody's righter than right . . . but curiouser and curiouser? Maybe. Myself . . . I've run into so many of you that i've nearly run out of retorts (with the present posting being a retort of last resort I might add). I didn't join this group to be insulted simply by informing a post-er (poser) (you) that this is a sidereal group, so one should not be surprised if one's tropical blahblahs are belittled. Actually, your posts remind me of every-other tropicalist i've ever met; it's not a pretty memory and i don't appreciate being sucked back in time -- especially whilst enjoying a Sidereal discussion loop -- by any such as you, so please save your admonitions for somebody else. (And please don't review my current post using a grammarian or book of style; there is no book of style for my kinda [sic] prose.) This is a SIDEREAL GROUP and if you wanna [sic] argue here please accept my crocodile tears. Sign me . . . snotty, immature, poorly-bred, asinine, moronic or whatever pleases you. //// Chris Paul Wing /// Age 58.99 /// siderealist since 1968 /// Austin Texas /// P.S. If any of our long-standing posters find this-here [sic] post inappropriate, y'all [sic] please whisper amongst yourselves. I don' [sic] care! PS PS -- not coincidentally, my current lunar return of 12/15/02 has mars/venus libra asc opp natal moon, with jupiter in mc cancer opp neptune. Needless to say, this is perfect weather for arguing. But as always, the blunder is ever-ready here. Believe it or not everyone, I am a pacifist! /// cw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2002 Report Share Posted December 18, 2002 Chris, I have put them on block. I'm just going to drop it and send my questions including some sketches that I have done to you personally. cpwing44 wrote: In a message dated 12/17/2002 7:43:29 PM Central Standard Time, DRStarman2001 writes: > Well, one can always hope that snotty responses are not the level of > discussion for an Internet group; we'll have to see if this sort of asinine > > insulting of people is the norm here WHO ARE YOU, and WHAT do you mean INSULTING . . . ASININE . . . ? And since when does being " an internet group " signify anything but its name? You're the one who came into the SIDEREAL GROUP with the latest umpteen systems crap as if we've never heard it all a million times before. You have yet to exhibit a speck of humor. and you expect people on this list to sit idly by while you surreptitiously insult us with your condescending attitude, " brilliant " dissertations, and impeccable english grammar and vocabulary? YOU are the person who was so insulted when others in this list responded to so much hogwash in your posts early this week (was it only yesterday? or the 16th). So why don't you have a laugh (at yourself) and see the AD HOMINEM [sic] in your own ignorance of what it means to join a sidereal group list. We like the western sidereal system. Most of us use it exclusively and those who do not are rarely argumentative about it; I think they're here because they're lovers of the art. But every once in a while, some fathead from ancient babble-onia jumps into the group and starts slinging the same old crap . . . then these same babble-onians get all weepy and parsimonious when someone in the group tells them " no thanks - butt out. " I am NEVER embarrassed by ANY degrogatory remark hurled my way by tropical astrologers. I'm only embarrassed for them, and piqued by the gall of their nerve for calling my science black. I repeat my earlier opening: THIS IS A SIDEREAL GROUP. We'd LOVE to hear your latest stroke of brilliance vis a vis the sidereal system of Fagan/Bradley et al; but of course you have none. After all, it is in their memory (also Gleadow, Brigadere Firebrace, Mary Austin, John Mazurek et al) that MOST of us continue on this path. Otherwise . . . we've heard it all vis a vis the following systems: tropical, bagelonian [sic], eminemic [sic], hypothermorphic [sic], transylvishnu [sic] and stupidcalefragalisticexpialidocious [sic] (i may have missed feznusian [sic]). So in all seriosity [sic] - - - since we've heard it all before -- and you've apparently known it all for EVER: Shaddup [sic]. Nobody cares if anybody's righter than right . . . but curiouser and curiouser? Maybe. Myself . . . I've run into so many of you that i've nearly run out of retorts (with the present posting being a retort of last resort I might add). I didn't join this group to be insulted simply by informing a post-er (poser) (you) that this is a sidereal group, so one should not be surprised if one's tropical blahblahs are belittled. Actually, your posts remind me of every-other tropicalist i've ever met; it's not a pretty memory and i don't appreciate being sucked back in time -- especially whilst enjoying a Sidereal discussion loop -- by any such as you, so please save your admonitions for somebody else. (And please don't review my current post using a grammarian or book of style; there is no book of style for my kinda [sic] prose.) This is a SIDEREAL GROUP and if you wanna [sic] argue here please accept my crocodile tears. Sign me . . . snotty, immature, poorly-bred, asinine, moronic or whatever pleases you. //// Chris Paul Wing /// Age 58.99 /// siderealist since 1968 /// Austin Texas /// P.S. If any of our long-standing posters find this-here [sic] post inappropriate, y'all [sic] please whisper amongst yourselves. I don' [sic] care! PS PS -- not coincidentally, my current lunar return of 12/15/02 has mars/venus libra asc opp natal moon, with jupiter in mc cancer opp neptune. Needless to say, this is perfect weather for arguing. But as always, the blunder is ever-ready here. Believe it or not everyone, I am a pacifist! /// cw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.