the Boyd chart (was Sidereal Signs-a challenge - Ed.)

[Guest guest]

<<My experinece with the so called " Boyd " chat is that it is a bunch of

nonsense, as you know because you surely have seen me say so hundreds of

times.>>

<<I see no reason to view this chart as the two events have no relevance to one

another, direct or casual. Juan Revilla, who is otherwise a brilliant man, has

fallen prey to the lies and untruths about the mundane relevance of this chart.

Not only is it NOT a " war chart, " but the time for it has been lost to history,

thus making any progressions or transits to it matters of dubious in nature.>>

 

Ed,

 

It is a " War " chart for sure, no doubt about it, validated by decades of

brilliant hard work, and the correct time is a lot less lost than the purely

speculative times used for the Declaration of Independence and other U.S.

charts.

 

To call " lies and untruths " the brilliant work done with this chart by some of

the best mundane astrologers ever (Jim Erickson, Jim Lewis...) is a gross

distortion of the truth, a fantasy too far from reality. All the merely

theoretical a-priori objections --based on prejudice-- raised against it are

really a lot of nonsense.

 

My thoughts on the Boyd chart can be read here:

 

http://www.expreso.co.cr/centaurs/posts/mundane/boydchart.html

 

Juan R.

[Guest guest]

, " prec2nod <hylonome@r...> "

<hylonome@r...> wrote:

 

> It is a " War " chart for sure, no doubt about it, validated by

decades of brilliant hard work,

 

Oh, please. This chart is for a moment of forgettable history that

somehow has attracted the energies of a handful of otherwise serious

astrologers who are playing Pied Piper to a city city of mice that

wouldn't know any better. I'm well aware of what you had written on

it on your website, and I don't agree with it, and neither would any

historian in the history of mankind.

 

 

 

> and the correct time is a lot less lost than the purely speculative

times used for the Declaration of Independence and other U.S. charts.

 

This is not true. There is no time for the signing of this chart in

any historical account. How something could be " less lost " is beyond

me.

 

 

 

 

> To call " lies and untruths " the brilliant work done with this chart

by some of the best mundane astrologers ever (Jim Erickson, Jim

Lewis...) is a gross distortion of the truth, a fantasy too far from

reality.

 

No, it's part and parcel of the continuing lack of knowledge of

nomology by astrologers. This chart is for a document,

a " Declaration, " which is also an olive branch.

 

The Continental Congress declared themselves in a state of defense on

May 15, 1775. This is the true war chart, if indeed there is one.

 

 

 

All the merely theoretical a-priori objections --based on prejudice--

raised against it are really a lot of nonsense.

 

Prejudice? You must be joking.

 

The nonsense is that this moment in history amounted to more than a

hill of beans. If indeed this " Declaration " was successful, there

would have been no need to fight anymore!! There would be no

Declaration of Independence.

 

Such logic is impossible to overcome, no matter what you might think

the astrology " proves. "

 

Aside from all that, I regard you as a very wonderful and important

astrologer of my generation. (Hey, even the Rolling Stones wrote

some bad songs, right?)

 

Best,

Ed K.