Guest guest Posted May 8, 2003 Report Share Posted May 8, 2003 , " alfonsoosorio " <alfonsoosorio> wrote: > Who was right? Ed or mI? This confirms one more that he does not > have a minimun formation on astrology. He ignores bluntly tropical, > sidereal and hindu. But what it mesmerizes me is the importance, some > of you give still to him, trying to respond daily to all the > incongruences he dares to write, thanks to the passivity indifference > of the list owner. > > > Alfonso Osorio Wow, you must have a severe ulcer by now, complicated by a permanently furrowed brow, and constipation. Here is a point of fact anyone on this list can look up: >>> At the moment of a person's birth the planets are positioned somewhere between these four points, as visualized from our location on the earth. What Gauquelin discovered is that the points signified by these four compass-like demarcations are actually meaningful; that high-achievers are born when certain planets are in close proximity to one or more of these points. <<< http://www.astrologysoftware.com/astromag/archive/articles/article_tem plate.asp?ID=19 & orig= Not only is it obvious you have misread Gauquelin (and who knows who else), but also that you owe me one big apology. A man with integrity would apologize for being so rude on the back of disinformation. I hope you choose integrity. - Ed K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.