Guest guest Posted November 21, 2003 Report Share Posted November 21, 2003 At 10:19 PM 11/20/03 -0000, Bob wrote: > , Therese Hamilton ><eastwest@s...> wrote: >> (...) It's nice to know that Fagan was adapatable. Any asrologer who has worked in the field for some years knows that as new evidence shows up, concepts and ideas have >to keep changing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >And maybe progressed lunars deserve a thorough try by todays >astrologers instead of a quick, uninformed (for lack of trying them), >dismisal. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hi Bob, I'm still interested in progressed lunars. My only problem is that not much of great interest happens in my life or the life of my family, so there's not much to show up in lunar returns. Life has a certain sameness to it. No big accidents, no upheavels, no travel, etc. I'd have to first get together a few charts of people where important events happened in their lunar returns. Right off, I don't personally know anyone since I live a fairly isolated life. Also for a long time I haven't worked with lunar returns. I only set up a few solar returns now and then. I believe when you were posting examples, for some reason, I couldn't access the sidereal site. If you have example charts posted, please give us the link as a reminder. P.S. As a woman I don't work nearly as much with precise math as many men do. I have never progressed solar returns, for example. Instead, I just set up an Ennead chart if there was an important event to check in retrospect. Thanks, Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.