Geoffrey Dean/Taurus

[Guest guest]

Dear Therese,

 

This 'gentleman of parts' has a very strong sexual presence, a veritable magnet

for babes. You will recall the early Egyptian symbol for Taurus? Such an one.

Uranus in Gemini is quick and clever but he is 3 Xs quick and clever. The

meaning of (say) Uranus in Gemini is indexed by the situation of Mercury in

that chart. There is no pret a port or one size fits all. Each chart different.

He calls himself a renaissance man. I am happy to believe him.

 

Dark*Star

 

-

Therese Hamilton wrote:

 

> At 03:57 PM 11/30/03 -0800, Dark*Star wrote:

> >

> >Hi,

> >

> >Geoffrey Dean 12/30/35 4:30 pm UT. London is quite close enough.

> >What change would the minutes of arc by neighborhood add to the natus

> >of someone that shows a strong bent for astrology over steered by the

> >even stronger hold of science and measure...irrational + rational?

>

> The source of Geoffrey Dean's birth information is " BC/BR in hand " from

> Charles Harvey (ADB). He has a Ph.D. in analytic chemistry and is a sci-fi

> writer according to his ADB bio. Apparently he's just completed some awful

> research 'disproving' astrology. Something to do with time twins not having

> the same kind of lives--his definition of time-twins being people born on

> the same day!

>

> I don't have the research at hand, only second-hand reports from India's

> Astrological Magazine.

>

> Dark*Star, we're still waiting for the Taurean traits you mentioned when

> you posted your 'triple' data. And also how does 'renaissance' relate to

> Uranus in Gemini? I don't have a clue. You wrote:

>

> For triple signs put up: Male 5/20/49 8:30 am PST Modesto, CA. in

> sidereal/tropical/draconic and you will find ~

>

> 3 Suns in Taurus: All his girl friends testify to his taurean propensities

> 3 Saturns in Leo: Never can get enough recognition in any 24 hr day

> 3 Uranus in Gemini: Calls himself a renaissance man.

>

> Waiting...

> Therese

>

>

>

>

> " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " -----

>

> Post message:

> Subscribe: -

> Un: -

> List owner: -owner

>

> Shortcut URL to this page:

> /

>

>

[Guest guest]

Therese

 

-

" Therese Hamilton " <eastwest

 

Sunday, November 30, 2003 7:35 PM

Geoffrey Dean/Taurus

 

 

> At 03:57 PM 11/30/03 -0800, Dark*Star wrote:

> >

> >Hi,

> >

> >Geoffrey Dean 12/30/35 4:30 pm UT. London is quite close enough.

> >What change would the minutes of arc by neighborhood add to the natus

> >of someone that shows a strong bent for astrology over steered by the

> >even stronger hold of science and measure...irrational + rational?

>

> The source of Geoffrey Dean's birth information is " BC/BR in hand " from

> Charles Harvey (ADB). He has a Ph.D. in analytic chemistry and is a sci-fi

> writer according to his ADB bio. Apparently he's just completed some awful

> research 'disproving' astrology. Something to do with time twins not

having

> the same kind of lives--his definition of time-twins being people born on

> the same day!

 

While I don't trust Dean or his motives, I wouldn't be so dismissive of this

time twin study. Many of the times are within minutes of each other.

Unfortunately for Dean, it appears he doesn't take much care in presenting

the data systematically ie grouping together natives according to how close

they were born to each other.

 

Still, time twins ARE an achilles heel of astrology and he is right to

stress " our " weakness on this score. There's nothing worse than an arrogant

know-it-all astrologer who can't predict their way out of paper bag,

especially when confronted with very similiar nativities. Well, maybe an

arrogant professional debunker, but that's another story...

 

Just my two cents.

 

Chris