Guest guest Posted November 10, 2003 Report Share Posted November 10, 2003 Hi Therese and everyone, I know the post I wrote yesterday was long enough, but it was actually unfinished. Which means there's more. (Sorry.) Here's part two, on something slightly different. Elisabeth: > >Strangely, > >the western sidereal astrologers seem a lot > >better in this respect, which is partly why I > >came to this group. When reading about the > signs > >on the western sidereal site (I forget the > name > >of it but we all know about it in the sidereal > >group) it seems to me that in general all the > >signs come off as equally good -- and equally > as > >bad. Therese: > I think part of the reason for this is that the > sidereal astrologers don't > want people to think in terms of signs, but > mostly in terms of the planets. Elisabeth: I have noticed this. Sidereal astrologers identify less with signs and rarely seem to say things like " I'm an Aries " or " He has Pisces rising " and then make conclusions based on that. I agree that the planets are much more important. Wasn't astrology originally focused on the planets anyway? I think you once wrote in a post to the list that the planets=psychology and the signs=situation or environment, or something like that. And then I read somewhere, maybe on this list, that the signs were once called " houses " . That got me thinking that the " archetypal " meanings in astrology probably belong firstly to the planets. Signs are just " houses " that have affinity to certain planets and have a tendency to resemble the planets that they have affinity with. Planets are like people, and the signs are like the houses that people live in -- or visit. People's homes tend to reflect the personality of their owners, and people tend to feel more comfortable in certain houses than in others. And so I see how a person with a strong Sun could be more like a Leo, even if the Sun is in Capricorn. The main characteristics comes from the Sun, which is like Leo. Only in this case the Sun is visiting, and it's expression is modified by Capricorn, Saturn's home. Correct me if this doesn't sound right. So I think Sun signs are, in a way, all " Leos " . We all have a Leo in us, which seems to tie in with what I said before about all the signs being something real in all of us. ____________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals..ca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.