Guest guest Posted February 17, 2003 Report Share Posted February 17, 2003 I had always noticed that one of the reasons why so many sterile debates surge in the astrology lists is that some members, most of the times, do not read carefully the postings and in their urge to say something, they rush to reply and to try to refute things no one has said. I had never discarded planets as instruments for reading a chart, quite silly and even stupid would I be, if I had said or even thought that. What I had said is that BESIDES, IN ADDITION to the planets, a domification of the chart is required, because with it we can try to decipher where,i.e, in what area of a life, does an event can happen. Elementary logic indicates to me that unless we can`t find or abscribe places in the chart for specific events, with the single presence of the planets we would be unable to determine that. This is my opinion, and I think that it is shared by almost 98% of the astrologers.This does not mean, of course, that it has to be followed by all astrologers. If some of you, decide to prescind of houses, I don`t care at all and it is not my intention to change your opinions. Another thing that mesmerized me is when Juan Olivier mentions that in previous posting " I had disapproved forecasting " . ???? Quite contrary to that, I had always insisted in the convenience of anticipating events, instead of waiting to read what happens and then run to give the astrological explanation. There is a new atmosphere in the list in the last days, and I think the better way to keep it in this condition is by avoiding to promote silly debates, specially when they are ignited by attributing to others things we had never said. Alfonso Osorio Send Flowers for Valentine's Day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.