Guest guest Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Respected Lalkitabee ji, I feel when any member give his comment or go for discussion on your write up and arise the doubts you take that personally and always you try to give a new turn to subject and try to prove to others that the person who arises the doubts has personal enmity with you. It shows very crystal clear in your mail. " At last-- U r not confused, u r determined to ur goals" this sentence in your mail prove my words. I think it is not a way of healthy discussion. Are you clarifying what are my goals? You wrote so many objections in your mail but you do not write a single word that how I am wrong and you are right about "Dhokey Ka Grah". I accept that my method, which I follow, is wrong but what is correct and how? Can you clear it? If you say that Pt. ji mention or by other mistake "Venus" as Dhokey Ka Grah is wrong I agreed but if you raise this doubt than it is your duty to clarify what is correct and how? I request you do not take any thing personally, come and give us the right direction to understand the lalkitab's method. We all are seeing you very hopefully. I am especially. Thanks & Regards Umesh Sharma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Respected Umesh ji, Before any thing else, I apologize if you are hurt by what Vipin Shukla ji has said. It is a problem of the English language. When Vipin ji wrote: “U r not confused, u r determined to ur goals & I can proud such a fellow like u in some manners.†I think he meant : ‘ aap confused nahin hai, aap jin uddeshyon ko lekar chal rahe hain unke prati samarpit hain, main kuchha maayanon mein aap jaise vyakti par garva karta hun’ I believe Vipin ji will clarify his situation better. I once again apologize if you are hurt. With respect and regards, Varun Trivedi , "Umesh Sharma" <mudit982001 wrote:>> > Respected Lalkitabee ji,> > I feel when any member give his comment or go for discussion on your> write up and arise the doubts you take that personally and always you> try to give a new turn to subject and try to prove to others that the> person who arises the doubts has personal enmity with you. It shows very> crystal clear in your mail. " At last-- U r not confused, u r determined> to ur goals" this sentence in your mail prove my words. I think it is> not a way of healthy discussion. Are you clarifying what are my goals?> > You wrote so many objections in your mail but you do not write a single> word that how I am wrong and you are right about "Dhokey Ka Grah". I> accept that my method, which I follow, is wrong but what is correct and> how? Can you clear it?> > If you say that Pt. ji mention or by other mistake "Venus" as Dhokey Ka> Grah is wrong I agreed but if you raise this doubt than it is your duty> to clarify what is correct and how?> > > > I request you do not take any thing personally, come and give us the> right direction to understand the lalkitab's method. We all are seeing> you very hopefully. I am especially.> > > Thanks & Regards> > > Umesh Sharma> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.