Guest guest Posted November 21, 2003 Report Share Posted November 21, 2003 At 04:09 PM 11/20/03 -0800, Dark*Star wrote: >It is Taurean to hold on to an idea resisting change. I don't think so, not in the sidereal zodiac. >We are all composites if our planets straddle sign and constellation, >but if low degrees Sidereal and high in the Tropical we are a double. I am a >double Virgo Mercury. My Sun Leo-Virgo. Venus double Libra. To my eyes triple >signs are a walking textbook of astrological proof. Watch for their charts. This is interesting, Dark*Star, but you have a way of writing cryptic comments and not really explaining them in any detail. So we have very little to go on for a reply. Triple signs? What do you mean? Since you haven't given any sign traits, we don't know which characteristics of the signs you're talking about. The Tropical textbooks vary somewhat from one another, and there are only one or two texts on the sidereal signs. As usual, we need to see the entire horoscope in order to pull the delineation together. Maybe you can give an example or two using charts of public people? You highlighted a pet peeve of mine: The sidereal signs aren't constellations. They're sidereal signs, each 30 degrees in length. Yes, I know that sidereal astrologers love to call them constellations, but for anyone who works with computer sky programs, this just doesn't work, and it gives Tropical astrologers fire power to make fun of sidereal astrology. In India the term 'constellation' can't be used for the signs because they call the nakshatras 'constellations.' Seeking understanding, Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.