35 year circulation of Planets. / Varun Trivedi ji

[Guest guest]

Note: forwarded message attached.

Forgot the famous last words? Access your message archive online.

 

Respected varun ji,

Accept my gratitude for sharing your valuable insight..

With Regards,

Pradeep Mishra.

 

varun_trvd wrote:

> Respected Mishra ji,

> [ 1 ] The 35 year ayu chakra [ age cycle ] and the 35 year dasha

> cycle are two different cycles. Both are independent of each other.

> The sequence of planets for both the cycles is also different.

> The starting point of the age cycle is fixed and is uniformly

> applicable . It begins with Saturn ruling over the first 6 years of

> the native, followed by rahu for another 6 years and so on.

> The starting point of the dasha cycle is not fixed. The sequence of

> periods ruled by various planets is fixed though. Since there is no

> unanimity amongst Lal Kitab scholars on how the dasha cycle will

> operate, this cycle is not used by most. There is no evidence of this

> dasha cycle being used even by Pt. Rupchand ji himself.

> A Lal Kitab scholar has suggested that the dasha cycle should begin

> with the planet of the time of birth [ janma waqt ka grah ]. But

> there is a big fallacy in this suggestion. Since the entire night has

> been designated for the Saturn, therefore it would mean that for all

> those born during the night the 35 year dasha will start with

> Saturn , or in other words almost half the population of the world

> will have Saturn as the starting point for 35 year dasha cycle. That

> will be grossly illogical.

> We as a group { Aligarh Group ] do not use this 35 year dasha cycle.

> We use the 35 year age cycle in almost all the cases.

> [ 2 ] You are right that the Sun keeps quiet in the company of Rahu.

> This is true only for the significations of the Sun for the house it

> is posited in with Rahu. It has nothing to do with the years of the

> Sun in the 35 year age cycle. The Sun will neither give benefic nor

> malefic results for the house it is in with Rahu. In order to make

> the Sun give its results the book advises that the Upaya for the

> eclipse of the Sun be done.

> [ 3 ] The help of the major events in life to ascertain the ruling

> planet in either of the cycles should be taken only if it is a case

> of ‘nashta jatak’ [ when the birth details are not known]. If the

> birth details are known and a horoscope is there in that case we

> should follow the laid down sequence.

> If a person gets married before the years of venus or builds a house

> before the cycle of Saturn, then the reasons could be different like

> the conducive Vinshottari dasha, or a conducive transit. Such events

> in life could just be pointers and not the conclusive factors.

> With regards,

> Varun Trivedi

> , pradeep mishra

> <pm_pmishra@ ...> wrote:

>>

>> Respected Varun Ji,

>>

>> 1) The 35 Years circulation of Planets and the circulation of

> natives years of age

>> can be 2 different periods.

>> It can get changed when Planets conjoin another planet

> (friendly or inimical).

>>

>> Q) Sun Cojoined with Rahu, the Sun will be 0(zero).

>> Does it mean we should skip the sun age or it means sun's

> signification will

>> be zero during Sun's age.

>>

>>

>> Q) Can it also get changed through events in one's life.

>> e.g A person getting married at 23 years so can we assume

> that Venus

>>

>> cycle has started from 23 years.

>>

>> Help me come out of the confusion.

>> Under what circumstances it calculation will be different from age.

>>

>>

>>

>> Please share your insight.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Thanks & Regards,

>>

>> Pradeep Mishra.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> With Regards,

>>

>> Pradeep Mishra.

>>

>>

>> ------------ --------- --------- ---

>> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile.

> Try it now.

>>

>

 

 

 

______________________________\

____

Looking for last minute shopping deals?

Find them fast with Search.

http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?category=shopping