Guest guest Posted December 18, 2002 Report Share Posted December 18, 2002 I think I can eventually help to prove that the Tropical zodiac (for astrological purposes) is a myth. But this does mean transferrng the observed Tropical traits to the preceding sidereal sign. I'll put some of this on my web site. Just give me a little time. The number one question is, " How do you prove one zodiac or the other? " Suppose you can only 'prove' that one zodiac exists? If proof isn't forthcoming for a zodiac, than that zodiac is only an opinion. That goes for tropical and/or sidereal. I believe (for the present) that the Tropical astrologers really 'found' the signs. Only they give the wrong names to the signs because they're really seeing the underlying sidereal signs. So no one is totally right or totally wrong. Some of the sidereal sign interpretations are outlandish, such as sidereal Libra being 'peaceful,' especially the last part of the sign where the stars of the scales are located. Goddess Venus was not a peaceful lady! Terese At 10:19 AM 12/17/02 -0800, you wrote: > >If Andrew didn't say it enough then I will be the one to say it. TROPICAL ASTROLOGY IS INVALID, FRAUDULENT AND BOGUS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.