Progression of the Lunar Return on the RAAM

August 2, 2002

, " Bert Fannin " <bwfannin@e...> wrote:

> Refr:02073104C:02080101

> Aug 2002

>

> > > ...

>

> He has a good point here. The

> rotation of the angles of any, regardless

> of its origin is basically a solar

> function. Thatthat the angles are

> progressed on the RAAS. While it would

> bepleasing to see the angles rotate a full

> 360 degrees in theof the Lunar's life, the

> use of the RAAM is not justified as a

> progression rate.

>

> > Just as you cannot explain to members of

> the scientific

> > community why astrology works, I cannot

> explain to you why

> > progressing the angles of a lunar return

> or lunar ingress chart

> > by the elapsed movement of the moon (in

> right ascension) against

> > the backdrop of the constellations

> produces such compelling

> > charts time after time.

>

> ...

>

> Bert W. Fannin

I will not debate. The results (charts) speak for themselves, and

over and over and over again they hit the bullseye.

This is every time and not hit and miss. I can't explain it or argue

it but the results are real, whether or not anyone can explain why it

is so. I will stay with what works. You stay with what works for you.

Finis

Bob

Recommended Posts