A request to LK scholars

[Guest guest]

Pt. Umesh ji, Vipin ji, Kulbir ji, Mahajan ji, Leekha ji, Pradeep Sharma ji, Dr Kapatjal ji

 

Dear LK scholars,

 

Could you please help me in decyphering an LK edict.

 

In the context of Sun in the 11th house on page 351 of 1952 edition it is said:

 

"Paanch chander de umra jo 12, aulad paida na hoti ho"

 

It is further explained on page 353 as:

 

" umra 12 sal jab nar grah saath saathi ya madad par na hon, aulad-nareena ki paidayash nadaarad ya murda laash hi paida hogi" [ chander no 5 ]

 

For the same context in the 1942 ed on page 124, it says:

 

"Chander ho jab panchve baitha, saal 12 mein marta ho"

 

There is no mention of progeny `nadarad' or progeny as `murda laash' except that " sanichar ki khurak ya mandi cheezon ke istemal se aulad ki tabahi ka hukma sadir kar dega".

 

[The mention of `nadarad' or `murda laash' progeny is added in the 1952 ed.]

 

A result similar to 1942 ed has been mentioned in the 1941 ed on page 70.

 

" chander ho jab panchve baitha, saal 12 mein martaa ho" [ 1941; page 70]

 

Similar result is also said in 1940 ed page 142 " umra 12 saal hove"

 

Now the riddle about the Moon in the 5th when the sun is in the 11th :

 

[ 1 ] concerning death at the age of 12 :

 

Moon is `aayu karak' so much so that even if it is placed in the 8th house `mrityu sthan' it promises a long life " Chandra 8ve khwah sab haare, par na haare umra ko".

 

[a] How come the same Moon when placed in the 5th house, the house associated with its friends sun and jupiter can give horrific result of causing early death at the age of 12?

Neither the 5th house nor the 11th house are associated with death, then how does death get predicted ?

[c] The figure of 12 is the nisfa [ half] of moon's year of 24, but the half of moon's year will not get justified till it is proved that the moon placed in the 5th will cause death.

[d] Moon in the 5th and the sun in the 11th are not associated through aspect, they are not associated with each other in any other way, then how death is predicted as a result of two unrelated planets. [ 5th doesn't aspect the 11th; the 11th doesn't aspect the 5th]

[ 2 ] concerning progeny 'nadarad' or as 'murda laash'

There is no mention of `aulaad nadarad' or `murda laash' in the context of progeny in the earlier editions. It gets a mention only in the 1952 edition.

[a] The 5th house is associated with progeny. But could a planet like moon [mother of planets], placed in the house of its friends, give such a horrific result of no progeny or at best a dead fetus?

When there is no relationship between the sun and the moon in this context, then how can any affliction to sun, of what ever nature, influence the moon?

[c] What makes moon [ the mother ] eat progeny when in the 5th?

Can some one please help us understand this riddle?

With respect,

Bhooshan Priya