Morocco Quake

[Guest guest]

Dear Therese,

More than 560 people died according to the latest news. The toll death may

increase. Now according to me Pluto is the key planet for this earthquake.

 

-In the last Caplunar (17 Feb 2004 AD 19:43:27 GMT), we can see that Pluto

conjunct IC (orb 1°57'45 " ). The quake chart shows Pluto rising as you

already pointed out. The same Pluto was conjunct DC in the Capsolar chart.

If we compare the transiting planets(quake chart) to the Capsolar we get

the following:

 

Transiting Sun conjunct Capsolar MC (orb 51'31.48 " )

Transiting Uranus conjunct Capsolar MC (orb 1°03'14 " )

Transiting Pluto conjunct Capsolar DC (orb 2°04'40 " )

Transiting AC conjunct Capsolar Pluto (orb 1°25'56 " )

 

Capsolar planetary positions:

Sun: 00Cap00'00 "

Moon: 05Lib29'10 "

Mercury: 06Sag13'39 "

Venus: 06Aqu18'35 "

Mars: 23Pis22'16 "

Jupiter: 23Leo53'33 "

Saturn: 13Gem46'33 "

Uranus: 05Aqu56'17 "

Neptune: 17Cap24'24 "

Pluto: 26Sco12'39 "

AC: 29Tau17'13 "

MC: 09Aqu09'34 "

DC: 29Sco17'13 "

IC: 09Leo09'34 "

 

Cheers,

Pingo

 

 

 

 

-

" Therese Hamilton " <eastwest

 

25. února 2004 5:38

Morocco Quake

 

 

> 6.5 Quake in Morocco Feb 24, 2004

>

> This moderate quake wasn't so serious. The latest report is that 20 people

> lost their lives. The same kind of planetary pattern happens as with more

> serious quakes, but the orbs aren't so exact.

>

> Morocco 6.5 Quake: 2:27:46 UT (also local time) 35N13 48 003W57 36:

>

> K Ingress Asc: 20 Sg Quake Asc: 26.0 Sc

> Jup trine Asc: 22.5 Le--> Jup square Asc: 21.3 Le

> Pluto sq Jup: 28 Sc--> Pluto conj Asc: 28.0 Sc

> N No trine Asc: 21.5 Ar--> N No qcx Asc: 21.0 Ar

>

> K Ingress MC: 10 Li Quake MC: 13 Vi

> Saturn trine: 13 Ge--> Saturn sq MC: 12.5 Ge

> Uranus trine: 08.5 Aq--> Uranus qcx MC: 09 Aq

> Mars conj IC: 12.5 Ar--> Mars qcx MC: 19 Vi

>

> Moon and Venus are trine the ascendant in the quake chart. This might

> indicate a kind of protection or ease since few lives were lost in the

> quake. The Sun is with Uranus, so it's also quincunx the MC.

>

> The quake MC is square the ingress ascendant, but the orb is 7 degrees

> rather than exact as in quakes that do a lot of damage to human lives.

>

> The two configurations that contact the angles in the ingress chart also

> contact the angles in the quake chart:

>

> Ingress Asc-Jup-NNo (plus Pluto aspects Jupiter)

> Quake Asc-Jup-NNo-Pluto

>

> Ingress MC-Saturn-Uranus-Mars

> Quake MC-Saturn-Uranus-Mars

>

> Perhaps one indication of how severe a coming quake would be is the

> closeness of aspects. Close aspects = very damaging quake;

> Looser aspects = less destructive quake or lower magnitude quake.

>

> Just some thoughts.

>

> Therese

>

>

>

>

> " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " -----

>

> Post message:

> Subscribe: -

> Un: -

> List owner: -owner

>

> Shortcut URL to this page:

> /

>

[Guest guest]

At 11:59 AM 2/24/04 +0100, Pingo wrote:

>More than 560 people died according to the latest news. The toll death may

>increase.

 

Pingo,

 

Thanks for posting the F-B figures. It looks like I'm more than a little

behind on the news! Yes, I have several days of newspapers stacked in a

pile yet to be read.

 

>>Now according to me Pluto is the key planet for this earthquake.

 

I don't believe that one planet by itself can designate an earthquake. So

far I expect to see stresses across the chart linked to the angles,

generally in the form of oppositions or quincunx aspects between planets,

usually with some close squares and maybe trines for support.

 

>-In the last Caplunar (17 Feb 2004 AD 19:43:27 GMT), we can see that Pluto

>conjunct IC (orb 1°57'45 " ). The quake chart shows Pluto rising as you

>already pointed out.

 

I see you've gone back to the standard Cap charts for this quake and not

looked at the solar Aquarius ingress? Pluto is conjunct the Caplunar

IC--O.K. And it receives the square from Jupiter which is one of the stess

patterns in the quake chart. Good enough for the time being.

 

I'm not into looking at the lunar charts right now (too many variations on

the plate), but I set up the K Caplunar for comparison. Uranus and the Sun

straddle the Descendant, so we have possible quake indications in both the

F-B and K chart. IC empahsis is better than Desc emphasis, however.

 

All three of these planets--Pluto, Uranus, Sun-are prominent in the quake

chart. Jupiter at the top of the chart (square the Asc) is actually the

main collection point for discordant energies in the quake chart, and then

Jupiter's collected energies square Pluto on the Ascendant. (I don't know

where Pluto is in relation to the actual horizon in the mundane chart.)

Jupiter receives the qcx from Neptune, the qcx from Venus-Moon (together,

the finger of God) and the trine from Mars-NNo (Rahu).

 

Then the quake MC receives the square from Saturn and the qcx from

Uranus-Sun, forming a closed configuration since Saturn is trine

Sun-Uranus. If I had to point to a main stress collection planet in the

Morocco quake chart, I'd choose Jupiter.

 

>The same Pluto was conjunct DC in the Capsolar chart.

>If we compare the transiting planets(quake chart) to the Capsolar we get

>the following:

>

>Transiting Sun conjunct Capsolar MC (orb 51'31.48 " )

>Transiting Uranus conjunct Capsolar MC (orb 1°03'14 " )

>Transiting Pluto conjunct Capsolar DC (orb 2°04'40 " )

>Transiting AC conjunct Capsolar Pluto (orb 1°25'56 " )

 

Yes...we have individual contacts here. The question is: Do these contacts

activate dormant stress patterns in the ingress chart? I believe (at this

time) that the stress patterns should focus on the Asc and MC (IC). In the

Capsolar, where is a major stress pattern in relation to these angles?

 

I'm not saying that the Capsolar isn't valid. I'm not looking at it in

detail yet until I've formed hypotheses about the monthly ingress charts.

One chart type at a time to avoid confused memories of which chart aspect

configurations belong to.

 

We're talking K pattern-configuations vs. F-B contact points, aren't we?

I'm not sure if the sidereal system puts much focus on patterns or mainly

on points (actual conjunctions to the angles). I know when I learned

astrology long ago (Tropical) there was a lot of emphasis on multi-planet

configurations and gemometry, and that's what I see in the quake charts and

K monthly ingress charts.

 

We're still only basically exploring concepts with nothing put together yet

in the form of hypotheses for actually trying to predict earthquakes from

ingress charts. That's the bottom line: Given a stack of ingress charts,

could we separate the pre-quake charts from other charts?

 

Thanks for your reply!

 

Therese