Guest guest Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 Thanks for your post, John. If those who have the money and power in the Democratic party won't do anything, then the only recourse I see is a mass revolt of the people, putting a stop to everything--like millions camping out in the streets of cities, closing everything down. The sad fact is that millions of people believe we've been bamboozled, but there may be a general feeling of hopelessness: " But there's nothing I can do about it. " Therese At 04:09 PM 11/8/04 +0000, you wrote: > >Commentator Allen L Roland wrote: > >Friday, November 05, 2004 > >HOW THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN (...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2004 Report Share Posted November 9, 2004 At 04:57 PM 11/8/04 -0500, Chris wrote: > >John, >There is no discrepancy in the exit polls. The early exit polls were not >representative of the whole electorate. Chris, this is not true. There was **plenty** of discrepancy between exit polls and vote tallies. Massive differences are there for anyone to see who wants to check out the links already posted on this list. But this list isn't the place to argue such points unless you, I or anyone else wants to point out the astrology of the issue. (I've partly done this by pointing out the Uranus quincunx to John Edwards' MC/Venus/Jupiter configuration in his lunar return.) Please don't make blanket statements without evidence. The evidence is there for large unexplained differences in the posted links. As I've said before: Ketu (the hidden and underhanded), Neptune (what is secret and/or dishonest) and Uranus (electronics) are very prominent in all the return charts for the election period. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2004 Report Share Posted November 9, 2004 Therese, - " Therese Hamilton " <eastwest Monday, November 08, 2004 7:38 PM Re: HOW TO STEAL AN ELECTION IN OHIO > > At 04:57 PM 11/8/04 -0500, Chris wrote: > > > >John, > > >There is no discrepancy in the exit polls. The early exit polls were not > >representative of the whole electorate. > > Chris, this is not true. There was **plenty** of discrepancy between exit > polls and vote tallies. Massive differences are there for anyone to see who > wants to check out the links already posted on this list. Could be -- I admit that I haven't checked all the sites out there on the subject. I did check www.cnn.com and their election coverage. They have it all there -- the vote by state and county, the exit polls, you name it. Unless the figures are falsified, the final exit polls are very close to the final vote tally -- within statistical error. The early polls were skewed by a variety of factors, the most important of which may have been a gender bias towards females who voted 55-45 for Kerry. Other factors have also been cited. Those midday exit polls had Kerry up 10 pts in Pennsylvania and Bush ahead by only 1 pt in Bush-friendly Virginia. You might say there reflected the real vote, but I think most polling experts of the subject now acknowledge that these weren't clean samples. They were wrong. Chris > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.714 / Virus Database: 470 - Release 7/2/04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.