[Fwd: [PoliticalAstrology] Fwd: Onprediction ~ from John Frawley]

[Guest guest]

I was just about to congratulate John Frawley for not using Sedna when I

realized that he couldn't know if he hadn't looked at the charts. That a leading

English astrologer wouldn't have looked at the Bush & Kerry charts is not to be

believed. Truth is he didn't want to risk his high position in being wrong.

 

Dark*Star

_________________________________

 

Therese Hamilton wrote:

 

> A NOTE ON PREDICTION- John Frawley's

>

> am referring here to predictions from the natal charts; I am not

> referring to predictions made by anyone in particular; I have not

> looked at the nativities of Bush & Kerry myself, and so do not know

> what is or isn't there.

>

[Guest guest]

Hi DS,

 

Agreed.

 

I don't understand this dance of denial that some astrologers are wont to

engage in after they miss a prediction. Why are they so afraid of being

wrong I wonder? Is it all about ego that refuses any limits?

 

Astrologers like to think of themselves as knowing more than most people

since they have access to this special, hidden knowledge. That knowledge is

the source of much of their self esteem. When it fails them, they feel

crushed. Ego springs into action to defend the vulnerable subject,

regardless of the consequences to logic.

 

Maybe if they stop thinking they know more than other people about how the

world works, they would be less likely to avoid taking their lumps.

 

We astrologers don't know better, we know different.

 

Chris

 

-

" Dark Star " <pansophia

 

Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:00 AM

Re: [Fwd: [PoliticalAstrology] Fwd:

Onprediction ~ from John Frawley]

 

 

>

>

> I was just about to congratulate John Frawley for not using Sedna when I

> realized that he couldn't know if he hadn't looked at the charts. That a

leading

> English astrologer wouldn't have looked at the Bush & Kerry charts is not

to be

> believed. Truth is he didn't want to risk his high position in being

wrong.

>

> Dark*Star

> _________________________________

>

> Therese Hamilton wrote:

>

> > A NOTE ON PREDICTION- John Frawley's

> >

> > am referring here to predictions from the natal charts; I am not

> > referring to predictions made by anyone in particular; I have not

> > looked at the nativities of Bush & Kerry myself, and so do not know

> > what is or isn't there.

> " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " -----

>

> Post message:

> Subscribe: -

> Un: -

> List owner: -owner

>

> Shortcut URL to this page:

> /

>

[Guest guest]

Christopher Kevill wrote:

 

>Hi DS,

>

>Agreed.

>

>I don't understand this dance of denial that some astrologers are wont to

>engage in after they miss a prediction. Why are they so afraid of being

>wrong I wonder? Is it all about ego that refuses any limits?

>

>Astrologers like to think of themselves as knowing more than most people

>since they have access to this special, hidden knowledge. That knowledge is

>the source of much of their self esteem. When it fails them, they feel

>crushed. Ego springs into action to defend the vulnerable subject,

>regardless of the consequences to logic.

>

>Maybe if they stop thinking they know more than other people about how the

>world works, they would be less likely to avoid taking their lumps.

>

>We astrologers don't know better, we know different.

>_____________________________\

____

>Chris:

>

>

Point taken. :-)

 

Bert

[Guest guest]

Hi Chris,

 

On the Noel Tyl forum all the Kerry predictions that had sprung up a week before

the election like mushrooms after a summer rain disappeared within two days.

 

Dark*Star

_________________________________

 

Christopher Kevill wrote:

 

> Hi DS,

>

> Agreed.

>

> I don't understand this dance of denial that some astrologers are wont to

> engage in after they miss a prediction. Why are they so afraid of being

> wrong I wonder? Is it all about ego that refuses any limits?

>

> Astrologers like to think of themselves as knowing more than most people

> since they have access to this special, hidden knowledge. That knowledge is

> the source of much of their self esteem. When it fails them, they feel

> crushed. Ego springs into action to defend the vulnerable subject,

> regardless of the consequences to logic.

>

> Maybe if they stop thinking they know more than other people about how the

> world works, they would be less likely to avoid taking their lumps.

>

> We astrologers don't know better, we know different.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

DS

 

How prescient was Mr Tyl ?

 

Chris

 

-

" Dark Star " <pansophia

 

Thursday, November 11, 2004 5:20 PM

Re: [Fwd: [PoliticalAstrology] Fwd:

Onprediction ~ from John Frawley]

 

 

>

>

> Hi Chris,

>

> On the Noel Tyl forum all the Kerry predictions that had sprung up a week

before

> the election like mushrooms after a summer rain disappeared within two

days.

>

> Dark*Star

> _________________________________

>

> Christopher Kevill wrote:

>

> > Hi DS,

> >

> > Agreed.

> >

> > I don't understand this dance of denial that some astrologers are wont

to

> > engage in after they miss a prediction. Why are they so afraid of being

> > wrong I wonder? Is it all about ego that refuses any limits?

> >

> > Astrologers like to think of themselves as knowing more than most people

> > since they have access to this special, hidden knowledge. That

knowledge is

> > the source of much of their self esteem. When it fails them, they feel

> > crushed. Ego springs into action to defend the vulnerable subject,

> > regardless of the consequences to logic.

> >

> > Maybe if they stop thinking they know more than other people about how

the

> > world works, they would be less likely to avoid taking their lumps.

> >

> > We astrologers don't know better, we know different.

> >

> >

> " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " -----

>

> Post message:

> Subscribe: -

> Un: -

> List owner: -owner

>

> Shortcut URL to this page:

> /

>

[Guest guest]

Chris,

 

I don't know that he did. As you mentioned, too musch to lose -so little to

gain.

A cosmologist with attitude got it right in three pages but they got rid of him.

Contrary post are soon disappeared.

D*S

 

Christopher Kevill wrote:

 

> DS

>

> How prescient was Mr Tyl ?

>

> Chris

>

> -

> " Dark Star " <pansophia

>

> Thursday, November 11, 2004 5:20 PM

> Re: [Fwd: [PoliticalAstrology] Fwd:

> Onprediction ~ from John Frawley]

>

> >

> >

> > Hi Chris,

> >

> > On the Noel Tyl forum all the Kerry predictions that had sprung up a week

> before

> > the election like mushrooms after a summer rain disappeared within two

> days.

> >

> > Dark*Star

> > _________________________________

> >

> > Christopher Kevill wrote:

> >

> > > Hi DS,

> > >

> > > Agreed.

> > >

> > > I don't understand this dance of denial that some astrologers are wont

> to

> > > engage in after they miss a prediction. Why are they so afraid of being

> > > wrong I wonder? Is it all about ego that refuses any limits?

> > >

> > > Astrologers like to think of themselves as knowing more than most people

> > > since they have access to this special, hidden knowledge. That

> knowledge is

> > > the source of much of their self esteem. When it fails them, they feel

> > > crushed. Ego springs into action to defend the vulnerable subject,

> > > regardless of the consequences to logic.

> > >

> > > Maybe if they stop thinking they know more than other people about how

> the

> > > world works, they would be less likely to avoid taking their lumps.

> > >

> > > We astrologers don't know better, we know different.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " -----

> >

> > Post message:

> > Subscribe: -

> > Un: -

> > List owner: -owner

> >

> > Shortcut URL to this page:

> > /

> >