[PoliticalAstrology] Arafat: an interesting date

[Guest guest]

Jim wrote:

 

>PoliticalAstrology , ChryssAlex@a... wrote:

>

>

>>NO in UK some our astrologers have never studied astrology - most

>>are journalists who ended up doing astrology sun sign pages:( its

>>changing slowly tho:)

>>

>>

>

>

> I take astrologers like I do any other profession - on an

>individual basis. Whether they've gone to " astrology school " ,

>university, written a book, advised a president, etc. means little

>to me. Our society tends to glamourize and idolize what are often

>all-to-ordinary people.

>

> When it comes to daily sun-sign writers for the papers who want

>to believe they are promoting astrology, they are just promoting

>themselves, not the art. If you can't generalize about an astrology

>chart (without talking to the individual), how could you possibly

>generalize, in a paragraph, about all signs?

>

> The guy that really bugs me the most is Rob Brezny - the widely

>syndicated columnist. He calls his column " Real Astrology " , but

>obviously does not tie in transits or astrology to his " insights " ,

>instead relying on flow-of-consciousness nonsense (ie. as a bug

>walks horizonataly across the wall of your room you think about the

>vast spaces in the universe). And the public loves it and eats it

>up. I've seen people, at the mention of astrology, say " I always

>read Brezny, I love it! " !

>

>

>_____________________________\

____

>Jim:

>

> And we astrologers wonder why we are held in such low repute. Go figure!

>

>

 

Bert Fannin

 

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>