Guest guest Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 Dear Friends, In light of events of past week, I believe the destruction and horror of this tsumani disaster has fulfilled the promise of the New Year's Day 2004 chart (January 1 2004 00.00). As I wrote in the 2004 Annual Issue (January 2004) of Express Star Teller magazine, there was a very ominous configuration in that New Year's Day chart for the world: Saturn opposed Sun and squared Mars all within one degree. To make matters worse, this t-square was within a few degrees of being anuglar. In the Sri Lanka New Year's Day chart for example it was less than one degree from angularity. Just for the record, here's what I wrote in my brief " Mundane Predictions for 2004 " article at that time: " This year as a whole looks more violent and frustrating than usual around the world, owing to a difficult configuration at midnight on New Year's Day. While there will be minor national variations in this chart, every country's New Year's chart will feature Saturn exactly aspecting both Sun and Mars, by 7th house and 10th house aspect respectively, within one degree in both cases. This suggests that simmering global hotspots will once again flare up or wars may erupt. Hardship for the significations governed by the Sun and Mars is also indicated including: governments and government officials, government buildings, royalty, natural destruction from fires and volcanoes, military personnel, athletes, and factories, etc. " Admittedly, this was a very general sort of forecast long on vague possibilities and short on specifics. But certainly the outline for a very destructive event such as we have witnessed last week is there, especially given the uniqueness of the configuration. Hopefully, these sorts of clear correlations will make this New Year's Day chart more popular among astrologers. This year's New Year's chart contains a similarly malefic pattern -- another t-square -- this time involving Mars, Uranus and Moon. Mars closely squaring the Uranus within one degree and the Moon is more than 2 degrees from exact aspect. Happily, this is not an angular configuration. While this bodes well for less violence and destruction this year, it still strongly points to sudden accidents, exploisons, and wars which will cause significant suffering. regards, Chris Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail./mail_250 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 At 07:02 AM 1/2/05 -0800, Chris wrote: > >Dear Friends, > >In light of events of past week, I believe the destruction and horror of >this tsumani disaster has fulfilled the promise of the New Year's Day 2004 >chart (January 1 2004 00.00). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Chris, what locale did you use? GMT/UT 00.00? Or do you set up charts for midnight for various locales? Have you tried to work with the traditional Pisces new moon chart that's used in India? Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 , Therese Hamilton <eastwest@s...> wrote: > At 07:02 AM 1/2/05 -0800, Chris wrote: > > > >Dear Friends, > > > >In light of events of past week, I believe the destruction and horror of > >this tsumani disaster has fulfilled the promise of the New Year's Day 2004 > >chart (January 1 2004 00.00). > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Chris, what locale did you use? GMT/UT 00.00? Or do you set up charts for > midnight for various locales? > > Have you tried to work with the traditional Pisces new moon chart that's > used in India? Hello, Butting in, Theresa and Chris, here is data for the Pisces new moon chart for Bangkok Thailand: 03/21/2004 05:41 Bangkok Thailand. Using the earthquake data 12/26/04 7:58 for Bangkok, the earthquake is there. Nelle > > Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 Chris, Your 2004 prediction mentioned here was made for what locality? Dark*Star ________________________________ > Christopher Kevill > .> wrote: > > >In light of events of past week, I believe the destruction and > > horror of this tsumani disaster has fulfilled the promise of the > > New Year's Day 2004 chart (January 1 2004 00.00). > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 DS, The New Years Chart applies to the world as a whole, however strange that might sound. There is little variation in planetary positions and the ascendant varies by less than 10 degrees for all points on earth. One might take note therefore, of the proximity to different aspects to the angles at different localities eg, Sri Lanka had the t-square brought right up to the angles within one degree (although the ascendant in Thailand was a good 4 degrees off the t-square degree, so one has to proceed with caution) Chris --- Dark Star <pansophia wrote: > > Chris, > > Your 2004 prediction mentioned here was made for what locality? > > Dark*Star > ________________________________ > > > Christopher Kevill > > .> wrote: > > > > >In light of events of past week, I believe the destruction and > > > horror of this tsumani disaster has fulfilled the promise of the > > > New Year's Day 2004 chart (January 1 2004 00.00). > > > > > Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail./mail_250 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 Hi Ron, Glad to see you back in fray. I was happy to see you put your " Krakatoa-like event " prediction up on the lists and generate some discussion. Hopefully, it will spark some imaginations. Your prediction had an event specificity that mine lacked, so, well done. We're at a point where we need to try to understand astrology from the ground up and predictions that are in the ballpark are good ways of doing this. There is so little predictive astrology out there that is worth a second look. But there is more to astrology than predictions as we all know. I'm travelling at the moment so I can't keep tabs on all my email. I only have time to open a fraction of them. Apologies in advance for sporadic response/discussion of all previous and future emails. happy new year Chris --- listlurker6969 <listlurker6969 wrote: > > > , Christopher Kevill > <ckevill> wrote: > > Dear Friends, > > > > In light of events of past week, I believe the destruction and > > horror of this tsumani disaster has fulfilled the promise of the > > New Year's Day 2004 chart (January 1 2004 00.00). > > Yes, I do remember you and I discussing, at the beginning of 2004, > that an event of this magnitude could be seen - albeit we used > different charts to make similar assessments. Somehow, in light of > the tragedy of all this, a congratulations doesn't seem in order for > either of us, but well...good prediction, Chris. > > Rony > > > > > > Read only the mail you want - Mail SpamGuard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 Therese, The New Year's chart is a world chart that can be cast for different capitals/countries if desired. There is little difference in the charts however as only a few degrees difference in the ascendant can be observed. I have yet to refine it to adequately address this problem. Take a look at the 2005 New Years chart for example. Both Washington DC and London England have the same rising degree, 13 Virgo. Chris ps One interesting possibility is that the New Years' Day chart may be activated by transits. I note that at the time of the tsunami transit Saturn at 1 Cancer was squaring the New Years Day 2004 chart Moon (1 Aries) for nations in the Indian ocean region. By comparison the Moon in the New Years 2004 chart in the UK was 3 Aries. Not a robust test I admit given that Saturn has crossed both these points due to retrograde motion, but worth further study. > At 07:02 AM 1/2/05 -0800, Chris wrote: > > > >Dear Friends, > > > >In light of events of past week, I believe the destruction and horror > of > >this tsumani disaster has fulfilled the promise of the New Year's Day > 2004 > >chart (January 1 2004 00.00). > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Chris, what locale did you use? GMT/UT 00.00? Or do you set up charts > for > midnight for various locales? > > Have you tried to work with the traditional Pisces new moon chart that's > used in India? > > Therese > > > The all-new My - Get yours free! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 , Christopher Kevill <ckevill> wrote: > Hi Ron, > Your prediction had an event specificity that mine lacked, > so, well done. We're at a point where we need to try to > understand astrology from the ground up and predictions that > are in the ballpark are good ways of doing this. There is so > little predictive astrology out there that is worth a second > look. But there is more to astrology than predictions as we all > know. Thanks, Chris. You've always been very supportive of me sticking my neck out there to make predictions. While I agree that there is more to astrology than just predictions, recent events with this terrible tragedy make me wonder about a lot of things and have reinforced some of my own ideas, which I'm sure must seem dogmatic to others. You see, I've always had this vision of what astrology could be. Had astrology followed a different course all these decades and centuries, perhaps astrology would have warranted some credibility. Perhaps, in another world, governments would have pressed you and I to be more specific as to " when " this Krakatoa type event would occur. Perhaps, astrology would be in a position to save lives. I don't know. I only know we are not where we should be. I can't help but believe it's because astrologers are more impressed by people who write books than by people who prove over and over they know how to predict. I can't help but believe that it's because astrologers base who they listen to on who they like most. And, I can't help but believe it's because astrologers are impressed by knowing lots of techniques instead of gaining extreme intimacy with a chart's basic energies - the basis upon which all my predictions have been made. I have a lot of regrets these days. I see the field of astrologers is beyond convincing because everyone already knows best and no amount of predictive accuracy will convince them otherwise so they too can predict world events consistently and accurately. Can you imagine if, year and year, a hundred astrologers predicted accurately world events? Maybe then those in power would take notice and lives could be saved. For me, it's never been about making a name for myself, but a vain hope that astrology be used for the benefit of mankind in a way that is far more useful than providing readings for the curious individual. Sorry, Chris. I know I've been overly verbose on your list, but I've just felt a need to write and get out some frustration that exists because of the disparity between what is and what I know could be... I'll try to be more quiet now. Sorry for barging in with my lips flapping. Thanks everyone for being so gracious and tolerant of my overly frequent posting these past couple of days. Rony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 At 01:50 AM 1/3/05 -0000, Ron Grimes wrote: >... >I don't know. I only know we are not where we should be. I can't >help but believe it's because astrologers are more impressed by >people who write books than by people who prove over and over they >know how to predict. I can't help but believe that it's because >astrologers base who they listen to on who they like most. Both of these statements are true. The cult of personality holds much sway in the astrological world. Maybe it does everywhere. >I have a lot of regrets these days. I see the field of astrologers >is beyond convincing because everyone already knows best and no >amount of predictive accuracy will convince them otherwise so they >too can predict world events consistently and accurately. You can help by posting your detailed predictions as you see them (for the future) and how you came to your conclusions. But if you use the varga charts (on this list), you'd have to explain how they are calculated and what they mean. This isn't a Jyotish list, although it seems to be trying to turn into one. >For me, it's never been about making a >name for myself, but a vain hope that astrology be used for the >benefit of mankind in a way that is far more useful than providing >readings for the curious individual. I'd have to say I share that hope. Astrology is in a state of flux in this new century. So many astrologers are older and generally 'fixed' in their views. Are there younger astrologers who care about helping humanity in general and who are willing for forsake favorite theories in favor of techniques that have been show to work? We have the internet, so it's easy to get the word out there. Will there even be an astrology after the over 50s leave us? Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 At 11:42 PM 1/2/05 -0000, Nelle wrote: > >Butting in, Theresa and Chris, here is data for the Pisces new moon >chart for Bangkok Thailand: 03/21/2004 05:41 Bangkok Thailand. >Using the earthquake data 12/26/04 7:58 for Bangkok, the earthquake >is there. Nelle ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nelle, you're not butting in, just joining the conversation! Thanks for the data. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 Thanks Nelle for that reminder. I haven't looked at it yet but I'm sure something is there. Hopefully there are significant hits in the pisces new moon charts of Indonesia, Sri Lanka and India as well and NOT in say, Cambodia which was not affected by the earthquake. Hopefully, I can get to that analysis at some point. Chris --- jeolearn <jeolearn wrote: > > > , Therese Hamilton > <eastwest@s...> wrote: > > At 07:02 AM 1/2/05 -0800, Chris wrote: > > > > > >Dear Friends, > > > > > >In light of events of past week, I believe the destruction and > horror of > > >this tsumani disaster has fulfilled the promise of the New Year's > Day 2004 > > >chart (January 1 2004 00.00). > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Chris, what locale did you use? GMT/UT 00.00? Or do you set up > charts for > > midnight for various locales? > > > > Have you tried to work with the traditional Pisces new moon chart > that's > > used in India? > > > > Hello, > > Butting in, Theresa and Chris, here is data for the Pisces new moon > chart for Bangkok Thailand: 03/21/2004 05:41 Bangkok Thailand. > Using the earthquake data 12/26/04 7:58 for Bangkok, the earthquake > is there. Nelle > > > > > > Therese > > > > > > > Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more. http://celebrity.mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.