Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 I have a question for Therese and anyone else who wants to chime in. I've been reading the snowcrest site, and was wondering whether triplicities are still considered valid in sidereal astrology? On reading the trigon page, it seems the attachment of fire, air, earth, and water is still valid, it's just switched, re: the tropical earth triplicity is now attributed to Aries, Leo and Sagittarius. Is this correct? Andi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 , " Andi Tobin " <stardancer wrote: >I have a question for Therese and anyone else who wants to chime in. I've been reading the snowcrest site, and was wondering whether triplicities are still considered valid in sidereal astrology? On reading the trigon page, it seems the attachment of fire, air, earth, and water is still valid, it's just switched, re: the tropical earth triplicity is now attributed to Aries, Leo and Sagittarius. Is this correct? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hi Andi, Many western sidereal astrologers believe that Ptolemy invented the triplicities, but they go back much futher to Mesopotamia. They were considered to be important patterns in the zodiac and were associated with the four winds. We don't know how they were used. (Mesopotamia *didn't* have the square divisions of the signs--cardinal, fixed and mutable.) Either Ptolemy or Valens aligned the triplicites with the four elements, and from then on they were called fire, earth, air and water by Tropical astrologers. As I remember, Fagan and other early sideralists dispensed with sign patterns altogether, blaming Ptolemy for their false invention. As has been pointed out by some writers, the Tropical characteristics of the four triplicities don't match the ancient understanding of the elements. (I have this in a file somewhere, and will have to look up the astrologers who wrote about this. I know Rob Hand has discussed the triplicities.) As far as I'm concerned, the observations of the four triplicities by Tropical astrologers do indeed move back one triplicity in the sidereal zodiac. But they are no longer named for the four elements. How this works is explained on the Lost Zodiac site in the first three articles: The Lost Zodiac, Part 1: Symbolism of the Sun and Moon The Lost Zodiac, Part 2: Polarity of the Signs: Male and Female The Lost Zodiac, Part 3: The Trigons (Triplicities: fire, earth, air, water) Reactions to those articles run all the way from, " Now I understand the sidereal zodiac--thanks! " to " You're crazy! " I believe Jyotish has blundered in assigning the tropical meanings of the triplicities to the sidereal triplicities of the same name. You can decide for yourself after considering the above articles in relation to people with stelliums in zodiac signs. Feel free to print the articles if you like. Best wishes in your search for truth! Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.