Re-Send: Sid/Trop Aspects Pluto Demoted

[Guest guest]

I'm re-sending this post since I've learned that now we have to use a

period filler for spaces since puts messages into HTML--unless

there's a way to change this on the site.

 

I wonder what astronomers would say if they knew that Pluto was only a few

degrees from the ascendant squared by an elevated Mars at the time of their

decision to demote it to a dwarf planet?

 

Ascendant for 4:15 p.m. in Prague:

Trop:...20 Sag 59....Pluto:..24 Sag 07

Sid:....27 Sco 08....Pluto:..00 Sag 15 (Krishnamurti)

 

Comparing the discovery and demotion charts:

T = Tropical S = Sidereal

----------

 

.............Discovery......Demotion....Orb of difference

-------------------------

T.Sun.......29AQ47.........1VI17....30.minutes.out-of-sign

S.Sun........7AQ00.........7LE26....26.minutes.in-sign

 

T.Saturn.....8CP58...Moon..9VI58.....1 degree

S.Saturn....16SG11...Moon.16LE06.....5 minutes

 

T.Uranus.....9AR06...Moon..9VI58....52 minutes

S.Uranus....16 PI19..Moon.16LE06....13 minutes

 

T.Mars.......9AQ38...Moon..9VI58....20 minutes

S.Mars......16CP51...Moon.16LE06....45 minutes

 

T.Moon......15SC56...Sat..17LE02.....1 deg 6 min

S.Moon......23LI09...Sat..23CN11.....2 minutes

 

Mercury was also trining Pluto at 4:15 today in Prague with an orb of 32

minutes.

 

The above is strong support for the effects of precession which means that

Rob Hand correctly figured this out a long time ago since he adjusts his

tropical solar returns for precession.

 

Since Saturn is cross involved (today's Saturn aspecting the discovery Moon

and today's Moon aspecting discovery Saturn), this supports Edgar Cayce's

contention that Saturn indicates change.

 

Therese