Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Dark Star, Good example. I think tropical ingresses are the best part of the tropical zodiac. They seem to have something to say in astrometeorology for example. I am a bit surprised how British astrologers at the time couldn't have seen problems ahead using this chart. It's clearly a disaster. It just goes to show how astrology is, was, and always will be riddled with wishfulfillment. Witness the overwhelming number of astrologers who picked Kerry over Bush. Some would say this makes it a joke and non-scientific. I like to think of it as a " reclusive truth. " You say there's no science in astrology. While most can now agree that it's not scientific in the classic Newtonian sense, I like to adhere to a broader notion of what science is. I don't willingly surrender the term to all those dressed in white lab coats carrying clip boards. If getting the correct birth time still matters, then to me that's a science. Chris Dark Star <pansophia wrote: The tropical zodiac is quite viable. It is just another framework. Have a look at the Tropical Ingress of 0* Aries over London of March 21 1939 1:28 pm BST. This is the famous 'No War!' chart that all the English astrologers got wrong by predicting peace. _________________________________ Patrice wrote: > > I have realised a new site for to put an end to the tissue of lies > tropicalists. > > http://www.astrologie-indosiderale.com/constellations.htm > > This site is french, but the zodiac and the natives are > internationals! > > Kind regards. > > Patrice. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.