New site about planets on the Ascendant

March 9, 2008

Hi all,

I've launched a new site where I've collected pictures about famous people

using

ADB and Google with a planet alone straight on the Ascendants. The aim was

to find out is there really any correspondence - do planets give a certain

" look " ? It seems that they really do. The differences between groups are

discernible, and they follow (mostly - but the exceptions are interesting)

the common interpretations of planets. I've added comments of my own where I

couldn't help but promote the sidereal zodiac. You can also show these

pictures to non-astrologers and listen to what they see in them.

The site contains sidereal signs and degrees for all the pictures. I've

arranged the pictures according to triplicities, so you can see how

triplicities look like on a sidereal zodiac. Do traditional triplicities

work sidereally? Does sidereal Water really look " watery " , or does it

actually look more " fiery " ? Does it look " cool and moist " ? Does is look more

masculine or feminine? How should we define " masculine " and " feminine " -

which one is more introverted, which is more extroverted (this is something

you may think when you're looking at the pictures of the Sun and the Moon)?

Here's the link http://koti.welho.com/jmetsovu/

Best, Sari

March 9, 2008

Sari! This is a very cool site. You've clearly put a lot of of work

into it. Nicely done.

I think the science side of things can be pretty tricky though. I know

for psychological studies of the effects of attractiveness, respondents

are asked to evaluate attractiveness of people in photos and their

scores are averaged. This produces a representative sample of public

opinion. It works fairly well because attractiveness is the independent

variable and career status, income or interview performance are the

dependent variables which are fairly easy to measure. Your site is

suggesting a much trickier question -- but just as interesting -- where

the physical appearance is the dependent variable. Very hard to measure

that.

Anyway, thanks again for your efforts.

Chris

Sari M wrote:

>

> Hi all,

>

> I've launched a new site where I've collected pictures about famous

> people

> using

> ADB and Google with a planet alone straight on the Ascendants. The aim was

> to find out is there really any correspondence - do planets give a certain

> " look " ? It seems that they really do. The differences between groups are

> discernible, and they follow (mostly - but the exceptions are interesting)

> the common interpretations of planets. I've added comments of my own

> where I

> couldn't help but promote the sidereal zodiac. You can also show these

> pictures to non-astrologers and listen to what they see in them.

>

> The site contains sidereal signs and degrees for all the pictures. I've

> arranged the pictures according to triplicities, so you can see how

> triplicities look like on a sidereal zodiac. Do traditional triplicities

> work sidereally? Does sidereal Water really look " watery " , or does it

> actually look more " fiery " ? Does it look " cool and moist " ? Does is

> look more

> masculine or feminine? How should we define " masculine " and " feminine " -

> which one is more introverted, which is more extroverted (this is

> something

> you may think when you're looking at the pictures of the Sun and the

> Moon)?

>

> Here's the link http://koti.welho.com/jmetsovu/

> <http://koti.welho.com/jmetsovu/>

>

> Best, Sari

>

> ------

>

> Checked by AVG.

> Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1319 - Release 3/8/08 10:14

AM

>

March 9, 2008

Sari,

What a fantastic job! Great! Bravo!

Thank you trines,

Don Ridgway

-

Sari M

Sunday, March 09, 2008 4:31 AM