Guest guest Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Hi everyone, Just now I had an interesting phone conversation with my granddaughter who's a student at U.C. Santa Cruz on the California coast. She said there has been a lot of talk among students of the predicted geographic pole shift with a target date of 2012 or before. There are a number of books on this topic, the shift being predicted by Edgar Cayce and many others. One noted author who has much to say about the shift is Ruth Montgomery ('Strangers Among Us' and 'The World to Come'). Just supposing something like this would happen, would this change the dates of the equinoxes and solstices (that is, the start of the tropical zodiac) or only change the climate around the globe? The equator is supposed to shift its position during the predicted pole shift. Is there anyone on this forum well versed in astronomy who can answer this question? Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Dear Therese, This is a subject that fascinates me, and I am not replying from an astronomical view either, but feel I must share a dream from last January 08. In the dream I was in a plane or perhaps a flying ship of some type and a man was pointing to the land below. It was the Arctic coastline. He told me this is where my new home would be. I said to him, ‘that is the Arctic, no way, I don’t like the cold’. He said to me, but you will love it there; it is to be the new Paradise on earth. End of the dream but I thought about it a lot over the year wondering what in heck it meant. Many of my dreams are prophetic. Still I can’t imagine this happening unless there is a pole shift of some type and so I have actually been thinking that it must be coming and since I am already almost sixty, it must be coming soon; otherwise I will be too old to be starting that kind of life even if it was paradise in temperature. It is also possible that it will be a future lifetime and even so in order for it to be a paradise, a pole shift still has to take place. I will be interested to hear about what an astronomer may have to say if one does come forth here. Morgana On Behalf Of Therese Hamilton January-11-09 2:25 PM The Zodiac and a Pole Shift Hi everyone, Just now I had an interesting phone conversation with my granddaughter who's a student at U.C. Santa Cruz on the California coast. She said there has been a lot of talk among students of the predicted geographic pole shift with a target date of 2012 or before. There are a number of books on this topic, the shift being predicted by Edgar Cayce and many others. One noted author who has much to say about the shift is Ruth Montgomery ('Strangers Among Us' and 'The World to Come'). Just supposing something like this would happen, would this change the dates of the equinoxes and solstices (that is, the start of the tropical zodiac) or only change the climate around the globe? The equator is supposed to shift its position during the predicted pole shift. Is there anyone on this forum well versed in astronomy who can answer this question? Therese .._,___ Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.6/1887 - Release 11/01/2009 5:57 PM Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.6/1887 - Release 11/01/2009 5:57 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 >the predicted geographic pole shift with a target date of 2012 or before. >The equator is supposed to shift its position during the predicted pole shift. Is there anyone on this forum well versed in astronomy who can answer this question? >Therese Astronomically all this speculation is a lot of foolish nonsense and a waste of time (to use very soft words). IF the equator (or the poles) were to move, it would be a planetary catastrophe. More probably, the reference is for a magnetic polar shift (not geographic!), but this is normal and happens all the time (in very small amounts). In the geological past there have been many magnetic " inversions " , but the reasons for it and the phenomenon itself (related to movements iside the earth's mantle) are not well understood (as far as I know). The so-called perfect alignment of the earth's pole with the pole of the galaxy in 2012 is also a lot of " nonsense " . Of course because of continental drift the equator is migrating in a scale of many millions of years. To make it happen overnight, if you want something so catastrophic at a planetary level, wait for a near-earth-asteroid to hit the earth. This threat is REAL and potentially apocalyptic, but it can happen any time, it has nothing to do will all the foolish " nonsense " being diseminated about 2012. Juan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 At 03:10 PM 1/11/09 -0800, Morgana wrote: >Dear Therese, > >This is a subject that fascinates me, and I am not replying from an astronomical view >either, but feel I must share a dream from last January 08. > >In the dream I was in a plane or perhaps a flying ship of some type and a man was pointing to the land below. It was the Arctic coastline. He told me this is where my new home would be. I said to him, ‘that is the Arctic, no way, I don’t like the cold’. He said to me, but you will love it there; it is to be the new Paradise on earth. --------------------- Hi Morgana, Thanks for relating your dream! I've read (I believe in one of Mary Summer Rain's books) that the arctic region will be much warmer, but that northern Europe will be frigid. I suppose we might re-construct the new axis from that information. Though nothing is certain, I guess. My granddaugher also said that some of her friends have been having dreams of powerful winds and flooding. I've also read predictions that human lives will be much longer, so maybe you were seeing a later time in your present life... Ruth Montgomery has been told by her guides that many with skills the earth will need will be lifted off in ships for a time until it's safe to return to earth. Kind of sounds like your dream, doesn't it?! I was quite amazed that these topics are being freely discussed on university campuses. The new 'builders' of earth, maybe! I hope someone replies with information about the equinoxes because it may be important for the sidereal zodiac if the tropical zodiac hits the skids because of reorientation. I have three Cancer biographies that I'm trying to find time to post. I dunno'--time evaporates. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 At 05:31 PM 1/11/09 -0600, Juan wrote: >IF the equator (or the poles) were to move, it would be a planetary catastrophe. Yes, and that's exactly what is predicted, the majority of people now living would be leaving us. Maybe 75-80 percent. I'm not sure of the number. >More probably, the reference is for a magnetic polar shift (not geographic!), No, it's an axis shift that's predicted. We know that magnetic shifts are common scientific knowledge. Anyhow, if there *was*, say a 30 degree axis shift, would this change the dates of the equinoxes? Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Thanks Therese, It is strange to think that this huge shift may just happen after all and soon; but using the Tropical Zodiac so many planets will be lining up on the 0 to 3* cardinal points next year. Unfortunately my Uranus is 1 Cancer so I will be feeling whatever is coming for sure; well I already am with the Pluto opposition right now. Long ago I read Mary Summer Rain's books. I wonder if she still lives in the mountains. I left behind all that new age philosophy quite a long time ago too now. I am not surprised that the kids are aware and talking of these things. Look at this generation and their planetary line ups in their charts. Using the Sidereal zodiac takes the emphasis away from 0-3 cardinal activation though. Wondering about the elliptic and the zodiac changing boggles one's mind. Morgana On Behalf Of Therese Hamilton January-11-09 5:20 PM RE: The Zodiac and a Pole Shift At 03:10 PM 1/11/09 -0800, Morgana wrote: >Dear Therese, > >This is a subject that fascinates me, and I am not replying from an astronomical view >either, but feel I must share a dream from last January 08. > >In the dream I was in a plane or perhaps a flying ship of some type and a man was pointing to the land below. It was the Arctic coastline. He told me this is where my new home would be. I said to him, that is the Arctic, no way, I dont like the cold. He said to me, but you will love it there; it is to be the new Paradise on earth. --------------------- Hi Morgana, Thanks for relating your dream! I've read (I believe in one of Mary Summer Rain's books) that the arctic region will be much warmer, but that northern Europe will be frigid. I suppose we might re-construct the new axis from that information. Though nothing is certain, I guess. My granddaugher also said that some of her friends have been having dreams of powerful winds and flooding. I've also read predictions that human lives will be much longer, so maybe you were seeing a later time in your present life... Ruth Montgomery has been told by her guides that many with skills the earth will need will be lifted off in ships for a time until it's safe to return to earth. Kind of sounds like your dream, doesn't it?! I was quite amazed that these topics are being freely discussed on university campuses. The new 'builders' of earth, maybe! I hope someone replies with information about the equinoxes because it may be important for the sidereal zodiac if the tropical zodiac hits the skids because of reorientation. I have three Cancer biographies that I'm trying to find time to post. I dunno'--time evaporates. Therese Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.6/1887 - Release 11/01/2009 5:57 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 At 06:06 PM 1/11/09 -0800, Morgana wrote: > >It is strange to think that this huge shift may just happen after all and soon; but using >the Tropical Zodiac so many planets will be lining up on the 0 to 3* cardinal points next >year. I believe what would be important would be fixed stars in the area rather than degrees of the zodiac. If you give the dates of the lineup, I can check the stars. But we've had mega line-ups before and nothing special has happened. >Long ago I read Mary Summer Rain's books. I wonder if she still lives in the mountains. I think so, but she's not New Age. Actually she's very critical of some New Age philosophy. >Using the Sidereal zodiac takes the emphasis away from 0-3 cardinal activation though. >Wondering about the ecliptic and the zodiac changing boggles one's mind. Right. And Juan Revilla has the relevant information (equinox date change or not with an axis shift) if he wants to share it. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Thank you Juan. I could puke the next time I hear the stupidities that are being propagated around the idea of 2012 and a fictitious galactic alinement. this idea is completely false. it is also being used to promote fear and unrest in a shameful and manipulative fashion Ignacio ________________________________ Juan Revilla <jarevilla Sunday, January 11, 2009 3:31:05 PM Re: The Zodiac and a Pole Shift >the predicted geographic pole shift with a target date of 2012 or before. >The equator is supposed to shift its position during the predicted pole shift. Is there anyone on this forum well versed in astronomy who can answer this question? >Therese Astronomically all this speculation is a lot of foolish nonsense and a waste of time (to use very soft words). IF the equator (or the poles) were to move, it would be a planetary catastrophe. More probably, the reference is for a magnetic polar shift (not geographic!) , but this is normal and happens all the time (in very small amounts). In the geological past there have been many magnetic " inversions " , but the reasons for it and the phenomenon itself (related to movements iside the earth's mantle) are not well understood (as far as I know). The so-called perfect alignment of the earth's pole with the pole of the galaxy in 2012 is also a lot of " nonsense " . Of course because of continental drift the equator is migrating in a scale of many millions of years. To make it happen overnight, if you want something so catastrophic at a planetary level, wait for a near-earth-asteroid to hit the earth. This threat is REAL and potentially apocalyptic, but it can happen any time, it has nothing to do will all the foolish " nonsense " being diseminated about 2012. Juan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Look at the tropical placement of Jupiter Saturn Uranus Pluto Hades from June through Sept 2010. Even Hypothetical Hades is hovering around 0 Cancer. Interesting using the sidereal zodiac then and they all become mutable in their line up. Neptune is still in Aquarius with Chiron, both getting close to 0 Pisces Tropical at that point. That is a heck of a lot of energy grand-squaring in the skies. Morgana On Behalf Of Therese Hamilton January-11-09 7:17 PM RE: The Zodiac and a Pole Shift At 06:06 PM 1/11/09 -0800, Morgana wrote: > >It is strange to think that this huge shift may just happen after all and soon; but using >the Tropical Zodiac so many planets will be lining up on the 0 to 3* cardinal points next >year. I believe what would be important would be fixed stars in the area rather than degrees of the zodiac. If you give the dates of the lineup, I can check the stars. But we've had mega line-ups before and nothing special has happened. >Long ago I read Mary Summer Rain's books. I wonder if she still lives in the mountains. I think so, but she's not New Age. Actually she's very critical of some New Age philosophy. >Using the Sidereal zodiac takes the emphasis away from 0-3 cardinal activation though. >Wondering about the ecliptic and the zodiac changing boggles one's mind. Right. And Juan Revilla has the relevant information (equinox date change or not with an axis shift) if he wants to share it. Therese Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.6/1887 - Release 11/01/2009 5:57 PM Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.6/1888 - Release 12/01/2009 7:04 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.