Binary Theory (Note to Dave)

[Guest guest]

Hi Dave and all,

 

If anyone is still around on this list, you might find this note to Dave

interesting. Dave, remember a while ago there was a conversation on this

list where we were discussing Walter Cruttenden's LOST STAR OF MYTH AND

TIME? This book and the accompanying web site of the Binary Research

Institute sets forth the theory that our Sun is actually part of a binary

system. The web site now has some very interesting supporting math to

support that theory. I tend to believe that our dual star would be a large

brown dwarf. Apparently these can be impossible to see.

http://www.binaryresearchinstitute.org/

 

But the reason I'm writing this note, Dave, is that it suddenly hit me: If

we are indeed part of a binary system, then this means our entire solar

system is curving through space (as noted on the Binary Research web

site), that means that the precessing equinoxes are not due to an earth

wobble, but to the shifting stellar sky as our system moves in an

elliptical path around its dual star. So any true sidereal zodiac **must**

be marked by stars because the stars keep shifting in relation to the

solar system.

 

In turn, the tropical zodiac is only an insignificant little system

attached to the revolution of the earth around the Sun. it remains

eternally fixed within the solar system. Measuring the in-solar-system

movement of the eqinoxes shows there is no " precession. " In binary theory

with supporting math, the shifting is due to the entire solar system moving

through space. The question then is, " Is there really a tropical zodiac for

astrology, or is it simply a convenient measuring device for astronomers? "

Are tropical astrologers only seeing the sidereal signs as Cyril Fagan

believed??

 

And how can a (sidereal) zodiac somehow operate and be related to a sky

that keeps shifting in relation to our solar system?

`

Thoughts to dwell upon. And no, I can't perform the math of all this

myself. I have to depend on the research of others. If Juan Revilla is

reading this, we'd all appreciate his comments.

 

Thanks,

 

Therese