Guest guest Posted May 14, 2006 Report Share Posted May 14, 2006 dear sir, Bhava concept is subsequent to rasi concept. Bhava divison is not always necessary. At higher latitudes you can try with Rasi boundries as bhava boundries. special systems of bhava division is not necessary at higher latitudes. you can try this. this must be suitable. rao chitturu. tw853 <tw853 wrote: Guruji KSK say no monopoly in astrology. Same thing no monopoly, no remedy in the house system. , " Padmanabh " <light_of_erindir wrote: > > > Everyone knows KP uses Placidus system. But it is not realistic beyond > 66 deg of latitude. How then to predict the future of a person who is > born beyond this latitude? > > The other house systems also are no better, namely, Campanus, > Regiomontanus, Koch, Porphyry, Alcabitus, Equal, Topocentric etc. They > all fail beyond 66 deg. of latitude. > > We in India live near the equator and hence the difference in houses > as per different systems makes little difference to us.But when > predictingabout people in UK or northern Europe, the differences are > very large. Hence a proper house division method needs to be adopted > which can be universally applied. > > Here in India, for now, Placidus is enough. > > Please suggest a remedy. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.