Guest guest Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 Is it same r dakshinamurthy whom we saw 3 yrs back, struggling with a guy, this pt himself was claiming to be good in black magic, he even threatend the guy for very bad outcomes, a nasty exchange, then a day it was exposed that this pt r dakshhina was a fake, fraud tantra scholar, he had a knack for mixing cultural terminology and presenting ideas as authentic write up of a seer, he used to operate 3 mail ids, in one id he was a tantra scholar, in the other, he was an admirer to his first id, and in 3rd id, he was somebody indifferent, this was a funny incident, i m surprised to see his ideas in group. Utkal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 Dear Utkal ji, In the fake id incident possibly Dakshinamoorti ji erred I think; but let us not forget that there are numerous astros who operate through many ids. In astro-netics (astro-politics!) it cannot be treated as a major offense. I remember that episode in which on the ather side a lunatic (whom people like Bhaskar ji., Sunil ji, Srinvas ji etc adore ) who later formed another astro group was the opponent. Since you know the Dakshinamoorti episode please search for the remaining story as well and also was it all beneficial to astrology or not. (Pls, all such searches outside this group! Don't continue this thread to discuss these persons) Anyway the point is - He was a very knowledgeable individual. I had good interactions with him in my 2005, 2006 vedic astrology group days. I respect him for his knowledge. He was a member in this group from the very beginning and is still a member, even though he hasn't posted a single message here till date. Let us respect people for what they are; for what knowledge they have; and let us not dig out the old mud. He never committed anything wrong in this group, and not much even in vedic astrology group, very knowledgeable and his personal business (whether it be pujas, astrology or what ever) does not interest us. There fore in this group he would be respected for what he know, and what he contributed to the general awareness and understanding of the people he did through vedic astrology group (only because some of his vedic astrology group messages got forwarded here) . My regards to Dakshinamoorti ji for his knowledge, and let us forget everything else. He is an knowledgeable astrologer located near Chennai, which charges reasonably high for his teachings and predictions I believe. Our regard is to the knowledge he shared for free through his numerous conversations in various astro groups. Let us respect him for that. Note: No personal insults to Dakshinamoorti ji please! Love and regards,Sreenadh , "utkal.panigrahi" <utkal.panigrahi wrote:>> Is it same r dakshinamurthy whom we saw 3 yrs back, struggling with a guy, this pt himself was claiming to be good in black magic, he even threatend the guy for very bad outcomes, a nasty exchange, then a day it was exposed that this pt r dakshhina was a fake, fraud tantra scholar, he had a knack for mixing cultural terminology and presenting ideas as authentic write up of a seer, he used to operate 3 mail ids, in one id he was a tantra scholar, in the other, he was an admirer to his first id, and in 3rd id, he was somebody indifferent, this was a funny incident, i m surprised to see his ideas in group.> > Utkal.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 Dear Sreenadh ji, One laugh a day keeps the Doctor away. Your presence for humour is certanly encouraging. That lunatic is adored by many. But I adore him the most. I would certainly like to get my hands on him to show my great love, and if you can provide him as a gift to me on Diwali, it would be the best gift ever. I will send you the prasad after distributing it to others who also adore him. Love n regards, Bhaskar. , " sreesog " <sreesog wrote: > > Dear Utkal ji, > In the fake id incident possibly Dakshinamoorti ji erred I think; but > let us not forget that there are numerous astros who operate through > many ids. In astro-netics (astro-politics!) it cannot be treated as a > major offense. I remember that episode in which on the ather side a > lunatic (whom people like Bhaskar ji., Sunil ji, Srinvas ji etc adore > [] [] [>] ) who later formed another astro group was the > opponent. Since you know the Dakshinamoorti episode please search for > the remaining story as well and also was it all beneficial to astrology > or not. (Pls, all such searches outside this group! Don't continue this > thread to discuss these persons) > Anyway the point is - He was a very knowledgeable individual. I had > good interactions with him in my 2005, 2006 vedic astrology group days. > I respect him for his knowledge. He was a member in this group from the > very beginning and is still a member, even though he hasn't posted a > single message here till date. Let us respect people for what they are; > for what knowledge they have; and let us not dig out the old mud. > He never committed anything wrong in this group, and not much even in > vedic astrology group, very knowledgeable and his personal business > (whether it be pujas, astrology or what ever) does not interest us. > There fore in this group he would be respected for what he know, and > what he contributed to the general awareness and understanding of the > people he did through vedic astrology group (only because some of his > vedic astrology group messages got forwarded here) . > My regards to Dakshinamoorti ji for his knowledge, and let us forget > everything else. He is an knowledgeable astrologer located near > Chennai, which charges reasonably high for his teachings and predictions > I believe. Our regard is to the knowledge he shared for free through > his numerous conversations in various astro groups. Let us respect him > for that. > Note: No personal insults to Dakshinamoorti ji please! > Love and regards, > Sreenadh > > , " utkal.panigrahi " > utkal.panigrahi@ wrote: > > > > Is it same r dakshinamurthy whom we saw 3 yrs back, struggling with a > guy, this pt himself was claiming to be good in black magic, he even > threatend the guy for very bad outcomes, a nasty exchange, then a day it > was exposed that this pt r dakshhina was a fake, fraud tantra scholar, > he had a knack for mixing cultural terminology and presenting ideas as > authentic write up of a seer, he used to operate 3 mail ids, in one id > he was a tantra scholar, in the other, he was an admirer to his first > id, and in 3rd id, he was somebody indifferent, this was a funny > incident, i m surprised to see his ideas in group. > > > > Utkal. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 Dear Srinadh Ji, Wish a shubh diwali to all,Thanx for writing back, In fact, I feel, there is no use discussing case of R Dakshinamurthy, However, an eternal question remained why their knowledge doesn't make them fair, doesn't create ethical values in their own life, how we can trust such people like this author, R Dakshina ? Doesn't it say, there is hardly true knowledge, looks, all effort was to look knowledgeable. In tantra, sadhana and true achievements are important becoz it's a practical subject, there is a diff in knowing about an electric bulb and becoming that bulb. Knowlege about a bulb can make us a critic or a writer, that's it, wd not give us realization bt becoming a bulb wd give us light that we can share with others. This is an eternal diff between lecturer and doer. If R Dakshina could apply his knowledge(?) of tantra or knowledge of black magic on that arrogent guy, and could a little harm to him, he wd have avail everybody's respect, and his words wd have validity bt he lost his battle, even after he openly challanged the other guy to use his black magic and tantra on the guy, bt, we saw result was opposit to R Dakshina's claim of knowledge. Don't you have these questions within you. Regards, Utkal. , " sreesog " <sreesog wrote: > > Dear Utkal ji, > In the fake id incident possibly Dakshinamoorti ji erred I think; but > let us not forget that there are numerous astros who operate through > many ids. In astro-netics (astro-politics!) it cannot be treated as a > major offense. I remember that episode in which on the ather side a > lunatic (whom people like Bhaskar ji., Sunil ji, Srinvas ji etc adore > [] [] [>] ) who later formed another astro group was the > opponent. Since you know the Dakshinamoorti episode please search for > the remaining story as well and also was it all beneficial to astrology > or not. (Pls, all such searches outside this group! Don't continue this > thread to discuss these persons) > Anyway the point is - He was a very knowledgeable individual. I had > good interactions with him in my 2005, 2006 vedic astrology group days. > I respect him for his knowledge. He was a member in this group from the > very beginning and is still a member, even though he hasn't posted a > single message here till date. Let us respect people for what they are; > for what knowledge they have; and let us not dig out the old mud. > He never committed anything wrong in this group, and not much even in > vedic astrology group, very knowledgeable and his personal business > (whether it be pujas, astrology or what ever) does not interest us. > There fore in this group he would be respected for what he know, and > what he contributed to the general awareness and understanding of the > people he did through vedic astrology group (only because some of his > vedic astrology group messages got forwarded here) . > My regards to Dakshinamoorti ji for his knowledge, and let us forget > everything else. He is an knowledgeable astrologer located near > Chennai, which charges reasonably high for his teachings and predictions > I believe. Our regard is to the knowledge he shared for free through > his numerous conversations in various astro groups. Let us respect him > for that. > Note: No personal insults to Dakshinamoorti ji please! > Love and regards, > Sreenadh > > , " utkal.panigrahi " > <utkal.panigrahi@> wrote: > > > > Is it same r dakshinamurthy whom we saw 3 yrs back, struggling with a > guy, this pt himself was claiming to be good in black magic, he even > threatend the guy for very bad outcomes, a nasty exchange, then a day it > was exposed that this pt r dakshhina was a fake, fraud tantra scholar, > he had a knack for mixing cultural terminology and presenting ideas as > authentic write up of a seer, he used to operate 3 mail ids, in one id > he was a tantra scholar, in the other, he was an admirer to his first > id, and in 3rd id, he was somebody indifferent, this was a funny > incident, i m surprised to see his ideas in group. > > > > Utkal. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 Ha..Ha... I enjoyed it. , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> > Dear Sreenadh ji,> > One laugh a day keeps the Doctor away. Your presence for humour is> certanly encouraging. That lunatic is adored by many. But I adore him> the most. I would certainly like to get my hands on him to show my great> love, and if you can provide him as a gift to me on Diwali, it would be> the best gift ever. I will send you the prasad after distributing it to> others who also adore him.> > Love n regards,> > Bhaskar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 Dear Utkal ji,//Knowlege about a bulb can make us a critic or a writer, that's it, wd not give us realization bt becoming a bulb wd give us light that we can share with others. This is an eternal diff between lecturer and doer.//nice point which i also share with you.I think this is the most important thing in so called spirituality.Preaching wont help unless we become that preaching ourselves.Yes that is Realization.Love and regards,gopi.Dear moderator,i dont know anything about Dakshina murty except i also have an uncle by the same name whom i respect for his practicing(sadhana).Love and regards,gopi. , "utkal.panigrahi" <utkal.panigrahi wrote:>> Dear Srinadh Ji,> > Wish a shubh diwali to all,Thanx for writing back, In fact, I feel, there is no use discussing case of R Dakshinamurthy, However, an eternal question remained why their knowledge doesn't make them fair, doesn't create ethical values in their own life, how we can trust such people like this author, R Dakshina ?> > Doesn't it say, there is hardly true knowledge, looks, all effort was to look knowledgeable.> > In tantra, sadhana and true achievements are important becoz it's a practical subject, there is a diff in knowing about an electric bulb and becoming that bulb.> > Knowlege about a bulb can make us a critic or a writer, that's it, wd not give us realization bt becoming a bulb wd give us light that we can share with others. This is an eternal diff between lecturer and doer.> > If R Dakshina could apply his knowledge(?) of tantra or knowledge of black magic on that arrogent guy, and could a little harm to him, he wd have avail everybody's respect, and his words wd have validity bt he lost his battle, even after he openly challanged the other guy to use his black magic and tantra on the guy, bt, we saw result was opposit to R Dakshina's claim of knowledge. > > Don't you have these questions within you.> > Regards,> Utkal.> , "sreesog" sreesog@ wrote:> >> > Dear Utkal ji,> > In the fake id incident possibly Dakshinamoorti ji erred I think; but> > let us not forget that there are numerous astros who operate through> > many ids. In astro-netics (astro-politics!) it cannot be treated as a> > major offense. I remember that episode in which on the ather side a> > lunatic (whom people like Bhaskar ji., Sunil ji, Srinvas ji etc adore > > [] [] [>] ) who later formed another astro group was the> > opponent. Since you know the Dakshinamoorti episode please search for> > the remaining story as well and also was it all beneficial to astrology> > or not. (Pls, all such searches outside this group! Don't continue this> > thread to discuss these persons)> > Anyway the point is - He was a very knowledgeable individual. I had> > good interactions with him in my 2005, 2006 vedic astrology group days.> > I respect him for his knowledge. He was a member in this group from the> > very beginning and is still a member, even though he hasn't posted a> > single message here till date. Let us respect people for what they are;> > for what knowledge they have; and let us not dig out the old mud.> > He never committed anything wrong in this group, and not much even in> > vedic astrology group, very knowledgeable and his personal business> > (whether it be pujas, astrology or what ever) does not interest us.> > There fore in this group he would be respected for what he know, and> > what he contributed to the general awareness and understanding of the> > people he did through vedic astrology group (only because some of his> > vedic astrology group messages got forwarded here) .> > My regards to Dakshinamoorti ji for his knowledge, and let us forget> > everything else. He is an knowledgeable astrologer located near> > Chennai, which charges reasonably high for his teachings and predictions> > I believe. Our regard is to the knowledge he shared for free through> > his numerous conversations in various astro groups. Let us respect him> > for that.> > Note: No personal insults to Dakshinamoorti ji please!> > Love and regards,> > Sreenadh> > > > , "utkal.panigrahi"> > <utkal.panigrahi@> wrote:> > >> > > Is it same r dakshinamurthy whom we saw 3 yrs back, struggling with a> > guy, this pt himself was claiming to be good in black magic, he even> > threatend the guy for very bad outcomes, a nasty exchange, then a day it> > was exposed that this pt r dakshhina was a fake, fraud tantra scholar,> > he had a knack for mixing cultural terminology and presenting ideas as> > authentic write up of a seer, he used to operate 3 mail ids, in one id> > he was a tantra scholar, in the other, he was an admirer to his first> > id, and in 3rd id, he was somebody indifferent, this was a funny> > incident, i m surprised to see his ideas in group.> > >> > > Utkal.> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.