Hindu religion and Traditional Astrology

[Guest guest]

Dear Bhaskar ji,

 

Your intentions are good, you are a knowledgeable person, you know a lot, you

are worthy of my and everybody's respect, but when without knowing me you jump

to the conclusion that I am one of those who have a hidden agenda on this forum,

you are showing disrespect not only to me, but also to your own sense of

righteousness.

 

Sorry, THIS is not the right way to conduct .....

 

You are taking away my self-respect by use of such harsh words. I have done

nothing absolutely to deserve this from you.

 

Best regards,

 

Vinay

 

 

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:22:15 +0530, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

 

>

> Dear Vinay ji,

>

> All your dates and perceptions are wrong and am not interested to change

> your views. If you think that the Earth is square and the sky meets the

> ocean every evening, and that the Sun goes in hiding at Sunset inside a

> Big cave, then its your take, I am not here to remove your confusions.

>

> Its quite obvious what your agenda is, on this Forum.

>

> Bhaskar.

>

>

>

> , " Vinay Gakkhar. "

> <vgakkhar wrote:

>>

>> Dear Bhaskar ji,

>>

>> Rigveda was written in 1500-100 BC, Atharvadeva & yAJURVEDA IN

> 1000-500 BC, Gautam Buddha was born in 563 BC, and Mahavira in 540 BC.

> And there were tirthankars before Mahavira in Jainism.

>>

>> To my raw mind, it appears Jainism & Buddhism did not come from

> Hinduism.

>>

>> I am not an astrologer, not a historian, have an open mind, and ever a

> learner. Will be glad if any confusion in my mind gets cleared.

>>

>> Best regards,

>>

>> Vinay Gakkhar

>>

>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:23:55 +0530, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>>

>> >

>> > Dear friends,

>> >

>> > Jainism and Buddhism have come from the Great religion Hinduism.

>> > Hinduism does not need ertyifictaes from its branches or third party

>> > references to specify or cooroborate it as the best. In fact there

> is no

>> > competetion between a tree and its branches.

>> >

>> > Same way foolish people are talking about proof through Quizzes, and

>> > advocating that our Traditional Astrology is the best. I dont

> understand

>> > in the first case why is Traditional astrology considered as low or

> the

>> > practising astrologers have a inferiority complex and need aids of

>> > Quizzes to feel on the sky, and proclaim that Traditional astrology

> is

>> > the best. Whats the need for all this hullaballoo? Can the son be

> better

>> > than the father at any given time ? Let us remind them, that all

> other

>> > branches of astrology followed today, are just offshoots of the

>> > Traditional, and do not think small of yourself if you have not

> studied

>> > about these offshoots and theres no need to supplement your thought

>> > process about Traditional astrology. It remains the Father of all

>> > astrology seen today.

>> >

>> > Do not live with a inferiority complex please.

>> >

>> > Bhaskar.

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>>

>>

>> --

>>

>

>

>

>

 

 

--

[Guest guest]

Dear Vinay-ji,

 

In reply to your letter, I shared my perception about the dates.

 

Now you have asked for " Correct dates " , knowing fully well that

exact dates for events happened long ago is quite difficult to establish.

 

It seems your search for history and my sense of history are not

compatible and sharing of ideas will not help any of us.

 

So, I withdraw from this discussion.

 

Please do not reply.

 

regards

 

Chakraborty

 

, " Vinay Gakkhar. " <vgakkhar

wrote:

>

> Dear Chakraborty ji,

>

> Thanks for enlightening me.

>

> May you please tell me the correct dates.

>

> Best regards,

>

> Vinay

>

> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:09:17 +0530, Chakraborty, PL <CHAKRABORTYP2 wrote:

>

> > Dear Vinay-ji,

> >

> > The timeline suggested by you needs revision. The timeline was

> > Invented by British to deny antiquity of Hinduism.

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > Chakraborty

>