Fwd: Horoscope of Rama - ACCURACY PART

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

This post is about the horoscope of Rama INTERPOLATED into Valmiki Ramayana

after BC 157, posted from a historic perspective. There is no intention to

distort any beliefs, trust in ramayana etc associated with this post.

Just posting one of my old posts from Hinducivilization group for the

consideration/intimation to Sunil Bhattahcarjya ji.

Note: I will stay away from any further discussion on this mail, since it may

cause controversy, and also because I have discussed this subject in the group

earlier in the group itself. Also note that after the accuracy of the data was

confirmed, Kaul was afraid to take up or discuss this subject further.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

hinducivilization , " Sreenadh " <sreesog wrote:

 

, " Sreenadh "

<sreesog@> wrote:

 

Re: FW: VEDIC JYOTISH - ACCURACY PART

Dear Chakraborty ji,

Your comments about the accuracy of JHora 7.32 and Astrodienst

(provided by http://www.astro.com <http://www.astro.com/> ) attracted

my attention.

Yes, I know and agree with Rohini Ranjan ji when he states that

Astrodienst (URL: http://www.astro.com/horoscopes/ahor.asp

<http://www.astro.com/horoscopes/ahor.asp> ) provides very accurate

Tropical Horoscopes based on Swiss ephemeris. It is also true that the

earlier versions of JHora was not accurate in providing planetary

longitudes for ancient dates. Let us compare the accuracy of JHora 7.32

vs Astrodienst for the date March 14, -156 Gregorian; 22.00 Hours;

Ayodhya, India. 82E12, 26N48. Here goes the comparison -

Jhora 7.32 Astrodienst

Lagna : 15 Sc 28 Scorpio

Sun: 23 Pi 57 23 Pi 58

Moon: 01 Cn 24 01 Cn 34

Mars: 28 Cp 04 28 Cp 04

Mercury: 08 Pi 00 08 Pi 00

Jupitor: 03 Cn 04 03 Cn 04

Venus: 01 Ta 52 01 Ta 43

Saturn: 10 Aq 38 10 Aq 37

I think the accuracy is acceptable, even though there could be minor

difference even now.

 

Note: By the way, both JHora 7.32 and Astrodienst (based on Swiss

Ephemeris) agree about the above horoscope for that date.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

, " Sreenadh "

<sreesog@> wrote:

Dear Chakraborty ji,

Hmm... JHora 7.32.... If so I would have to say again that " March 14,

-156 Gregorian; 22.00 Hours; Ayodhya, India " gives Tropical chart of

Rama given in Ramayana accurately. Yes, must be an interpolation - but

as per JHora 7.32 this remains true, and this is the ONLY combination

from BC 5400 to AD 5400 I can find that satisfies this combination. A

unique info, but I am afraid of controversies and without touching the

divinity, can accept that this chart must be an interpolation to the to

the text Ramayana done during BC 156 or so. But does this derivation

hold good as per Swiss ephemeris - I doubt. Chakraborty ji what is your

take?

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

> , " Chakraborty, PL "

> CHAKRABORTYP2@ wrote:

> >

> > Hello Seniors,

> >

> > Probably I was in haste.

> >

> > I am forwarding the mail form Hank Friedman.

> >

> > He mentions that J-Hora 7.32 is accurate. I will go by

> > that.

> >

> >

> > regards

> >

> > P L Chakraborty

 

--- End forwarded message ---

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadhji,From the historical angle I am fully satisfied with the precessional data which places Lord Rama 's brth around 7300 BCEFrom the religious point of view I am satisfied that Lord Rama was born at the noontime on Shukla Navami in the purnimata Chaitra month.Other academic debate on the exact date of Lord rama's birth can go on and I am in no hurry nor overly anxious to know that.Regards,Sunil K. Bhattacharjya--- On Mon, 11/16/09, sreesog <sreesog wrote:sreesog <sreesog Fwd: Horoscope of Rama - ACCURACY PART Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 11:10

PM

 

 

Dear All,

This post is about the horoscope of Rama INTERPOLATED into Valmiki Ramayana after BC 157, posted from a historic perspective. There is no intention to distort any beliefs, trust in ramayana etc associated with this post.

Just posting one of my old posts from Hinducivilization group for the consideration/ intimation to Sunil Bhattahcarjya ji.

Note: I will stay away from any further discussion on this mail, since it may cause controversy, and also because I have discussed this subject in the group earlier in the group itself. Also note that after the accuracy of the data was confirmed, Kaul was afraid to take up or discuss this subject further.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

hinducivilization, "Sreenadh" <sreesog > wrote:

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, "Sreenadh"

<sreesog@> wrote:

 

Re: FW: VEDIC JYOTISH - ACCURACY PART

Dear Chakraborty ji,

Your comments about the accuracy of JHora 7.32 and Astrodienst

(provided by http://www.astro. com <http://www.astro. com/> ) attracted

my attention.

Yes, I know and agree with Rohini Ranjan ji when he states that

Astrodienst (URL: http://www.astro. com/horoscopes/ ahor.asp

<http://www.astro. com/horoscopes/ ahor.asp> ) provides very accurate

Tropical Horoscopes based on Swiss ephemeris. It is also true that the

earlier versions of JHora was not accurate in providing planetary

longitudes for ancient dates. Let us compare the accuracy of JHora 7.32

vs Astrodienst for the date March 14, -156 Gregorian; 22.00 Hours;

Ayodhya, India. 82E12, 26N48. Here goes the comparison -

Jhora 7.32 Astrodienst

Lagna : 15 Sc 28 Scorpio

Sun: 23 Pi 57 23 Pi 58

Moon: 01 Cn 24 01 Cn 34

Mars: 28 Cp 04 28 Cp 04

Mercury: 08 Pi 00 08 Pi 00

Jupitor: 03 Cn 04 03 Cn 04

Venus: 01 Ta 52 01 Ta 43

Saturn: 10 Aq 38 10 Aq 37

I think the accuracy is acceptable, even though there could be minor

difference even now.

 

Note: By the way, both JHora 7.32 and Astrodienst (based on Swiss

Ephemeris) agree about the above horoscope for that date.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, "Sreenadh"

<sreesog@> wrote:

Dear Chakraborty ji,

Hmm... JHora 7.32.... If so I would have to say again that "March 14,

-156 Gregorian; 22.00 Hours; Ayodhya, India" gives Tropical chart of

Rama given in Ramayana accurately. Yes, must be an interpolation - but

as per JHora 7.32 this remains true, and this is the ONLY combination

from BC 5400 to AD 5400 I can find that satisfies this combination. A

unique info, but I am afraid of controversies and without touching the

divinity, can accept that this chart must be an interpolation to the to

the text Ramayana done during BC 156 or so. But does this derivation

hold good as per Swiss ephemeris - I doubt. Chakraborty ji what is your

take?

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

> ancient_indian_ astrology, "Chakraborty, PL"

> CHAKRABORTYP2@ wrote:

> >

> > Hello Seniors,

> >

> > Probably I was in haste.

> >

> > I am forwarding the mail form Hank Friedman.

> >

> > He mentions that J-Hora 7.32 is accurate. I will go by

> > that.

> >

> >

> > regards

> >

> > P L Chakraborty

 

--- End forwarded message ---