Jeeva Sarmeeya Ayu

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

Next, I will try to contemplate on Jeevasarmeeya Ayu system which assigns

equal longevity to all planets and tries to calculate the max. expected

longevity. I will provide an article on the same and also include this method

too into the current longevity worksheet.

Any thoughts on this system from scholars like Goel ji, Kursija ji etc is

welcome. Also I request them to experiment with and provide their feedback after

experimenting with Pindayu worksheet.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

, " sreesog " <sreesog wrote:

>

> Dear All,

> * While using the Pindayu worksheet provided by me DON'T input the lagna

sputa (to indicate this, I have used gray colored cells in that worksheet for

Lagna sputa with 0 as default value).Considering the longevity indicated by

planets ALONE will give a longevity that would be usually higher (at least 7+

years) than the actual longevity experienced.

> * BUT, if you want to experiment with the 'others' opinion as well (other

than Skanda) then input the Laga longitude as well, and the worksheet will

consider Lagnayu also in longevity calculations and will display the result

accordingly.

> The unrealistic (7+ to 10+ years EXTRA) longevity provided by this method,

prompts us to contemplate some corrections for this method and experiment with

the same.

> * Even if all planets are in debilitation, and even if all Harana

(deductions) apply completely, then too a native will get 7+ years longevity as

per this method! That means that under any condition this method DOES NOT apply

to natives died prior to 7 years. There is a 7 years extra longevity inherent in

the max longevity of 127 years proposed by Pindayu (compared to the standard use

of 120 years). This prompts us to ask - Since even skanda states that longevity

years indicated by planets decrease gradually with the advent of Yugas, is it

necessory to change the longevity years of planets and experiment with the same

to arrive at a realistic value?

> * If the values provided by Pindayu is unrealistic, why still then too,

Skanda, Daksha, Sounaka, Parasara, Maya, Mihira etc considered Pindayu as

authentic? Is it just because of its 'oldestness' alone? Possibly it is so. This

prompts us to think that, this oldest and 'once most accurate' (in some ancient

period) method needs to be corrected and made realistic again by adjusting the

longevity years given to the planets (This is the only major way of correcting

this method I could visualize).

> * If we trust Skanda and other ancient sages and scholars upto Mihira, then

certainly we SHOULD NOT consider Lagnayu or Lagnamsakayu in Pindayu

calculations. That makes the unrealistic (7+ years more than actual) results

given by Pindayu method more unrealistic (extending the difference usually to

10+ years).

> Hope some of you - who experiment with Pindayu and the worksheet provided -

will find this information useful.

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>