Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: Rahu aspect - What is your opinion?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

The following is a mail on Rahu aspect from Anil Kumar. What is your opinion?

Rahu and Ketu has aspect or not? Similarly Rahu and Ketu has

exaltation/debilitation or not?

Apart from current compilation of BPHS which are the other ancient astro

classics that speak about Rahu-Ketu Drishti? Do they have consensus among them

regarding drishti, exaltation, debilitation etc of Rahu-Ketu? Is so why? If not

why?

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

vedic astrology , " aokedia " <anilkedia wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Chandrashekharji

 

RAM KRISHN HARE

 

You wrote:

" If I remember right Laghu parashari says that Rahu/Ketu (by

extension) also give the results of planets occupying 7th house from

them. It does not talk about Rahu and Ketu having aspect on 7th

house. Since he only says tomograhH, it could also mean only Rahu. "

---

First, Tamo grah include both raho and ketu.Both block light during

eclipse.

Second, If you prescribe the results to aspects,there is no need to

consider any special rule.What happens if 7th is empty?Ofcourse you

have

to see it in some vargas as ketu is always in 7th from rahu in D1. So

do

you think that it will not give any results of 7th house from it in

say

D24? Do you use it for both natal and transit placement?

 

As far as classical reference is concerned,See Jatak-Parijat ch.2

verse 32.

It clearly says rahu's aspect is downward,confirming Rahu has aspect!

 

BPHS(Khemraj-Shrikrishndas-edition) in chapter 47,verse 26,says:

SUT-MADAN-NAV-ANTE POORN DRISHTIM TAMASYA

YUGAL-DASHAM GEHE CH ARDH DRISHTIM VADANTI

SAHAJ-RIPU VIPASHYAN PAD DRISHTI

 

Meaning rahu and ketu have full aspect on 5-7-9-12.

half aspect on 2-10.

quarter aspect on 3-6.

 

Do you have this BPHS?

Late Jagannath Bhasin has strongly endorsed these aspects in his

books.

 

Now can you provide any reference which explicitly says that Rahu/Ketu

do not have any aspect?

 

Prashant wrote: " i dont believe in 7th 'aspect' of rahu-ketu. any

planet with ra or ke is caught in the axis, & shows affliction. what

is the need of describing it as 7th aspect. "

 

I think there is still need of describing it as 7th aspect.Otherwise,

it

should not give any results in Rahu dasha.Its results will be

restricted

to Ketu dasha only.If you get results in both rahu and ketu dasha,you

have

to accept both.

 

Thanks

 

Anilkumar

 

OM TAT SAT

 

PS: Visti can you check your BPHS if it is in chapter 51 or 47?

 

--- End forwarded message ---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...