Logevity - Jeevasarmeeya Ayu

November 25, 2009

Dear All, I have updated the "Easy Calc.xls" excel sheet with the calculations for "Jeevasarmeeya Ayu" method for longevity calculation as well. Some interesting points are as follows - * If all 9 planets are considered the max longevity for Jeevasarmeeya Ayu is 120 years. (which we may consider as logical) * BUT Acharya Jeevasarma DO NOT ask us to consider Rahu and Ketu, and therefore the max. longevity as per this method is 93.33 years only! * Actually since Jeevasarma knew that Pindayu calculations are NOT giving correct results, this is his correction effort to that system by assigning equal longevity to all planets (13.33 years) and reducing the max longevity to 93.33 to be more in tune with the current usual longevty experienced by people. * Please note that Lagna, Rahu and Ketu are NOT considered in this system for longevity calculations. (But I have given the facility to consider these as well, if required, in the excel sheet on an experimental bais) I completely agree with the opinion of Acharya Jeevasarma regarding his correction effort and could see that if I apply the same on some known chart such as that of Rajiv Gandhi (for whom the the actual longevity was 46 years and 6 months), I get the result as - 46 years 8 months! An excellent match! I request you to experiment with this Longevity calculation method as well. Thus now we know that Amsayu and Jeevasarmeeya Ayu longevity calculation methods are more in tune with reality whereas Pindayu is not - yes, the conclusion is worth the effort! Longevity Harana (Deduction) Serial Planet Sign Degree Minute Max. Degree of Exaltation Longevity Years House Count Malefic Enemy house Combust Retrograde Vargottama / Swakshetra / Swamsa / Swa-Drekkana T1 T2 Std. Longevity Satru keshetra Moudhya Drishyartha Divisor Drishyartha Amsadi Lagnayu 1 Asc 0 0 0 0.00 1 N N N N N 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2 Su 4 3 4 570 13.33 1 Y N N N N 7384 3986 9.125 9.125 9.125 1.000 9.125 8.956 0.000 3 Mo 4 16 7 1950 13.33 1 N N Y N N 8167 4583 9.493 9.493 4.747 1.000 4.747 4.659 0.000 4 Ma 5 0 27 17850 13.33 2 Y Y N N N 9027 1977 7.885 5.257 5.257 1.000 5.257 5.159 0.000 5 Me 4 27 49 9870 13.33 1 Y N N N N 8869 9799 12.712 12.712 12.712 1.000 12.712 12.477 0.000 6 Ju 4 11 28 5670 13.33 1 N N Y N N 7888 8582 11.961 11.961 5.981 1.000 5.981 5.870 0.000 7 Ve 4 17 54 21390 13.33 1 N Y N N N 8274 2316 8.094 5.396 5.396 1.000 5.396 5.296 0.000 8 Sa 2 13 29 11970 13.33 11 Y N N N N 4409 3239 8.664 8.664 8.664 2.000 4.332 4.252 0.000 9 Ra 0 0 0 11970 0.00 0 Y N N N N 0 1170 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10 Ke 0 0 0 11970 0.00 0 Y N N N N 0 1170 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 93.3 67.934 62.608 51.881 0.000 47.549 46.668 0.000 Major Malefic in Lagna Y 46 8 0 Navamsa Count of Lagna 2 Maximum Expected Longevity = 46 Years 8 Months 0 Days Love and regards,Sreenadh-Vinay Gakkhar11/19/09 03:30 pm Subject: Logevity Dear Sreenadh ji, I am using Excel 2000. Best regards, Vinay On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:20:05 +0530, sreesog <sreesog wrote: > Dear Vinay ji, > //> Why the previous file was working well at your end and giving difficulty on Karan ji's & my end// > That might be a problem with excel version both of us are using. I am using excel 2002; and I believe in excel 2000 to 2007 versions that sheet should work fine. Please share the version number of excel you are using; that info could be useful to me in my testing profession as well. > Love and regards, > Sreenadh > > , "Vinay Gakkhar." <vgakkhar wrote: >> >> Dear Sreenadh ji, >> >> Why the previous file was working well at your end and giving difficulty on Karan ji's & my end may not be so necessary to analyse now that the flaw is not there in this newly updated file, it is working well at my end, it should hopefully work well at Karan ji's end too. I will be careful not to edit values in cells other than the orange ones. >> >> Thanks for all that you are doing. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Vinay >> >> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:23:12 +0530, sreesog <sreesog wrote: >> >> > Dear Karan ji, >> > Since it is working fine at my end, I don't understand what is wrong >> > with the file. Anyway, I have unprotected the sheets and uploaded it >> > again. So please be careful, and don't edit the values in other cells; >> > otherwise the sheet will start giving erroneous results. >> > Love and regards, >> > Sreenadh >> > >> > , "Karan" <karan@> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear Sreenadh Ji >> >> >> >> I believe by mistake the orange cells also have been protected because >> > in the Cells wherein we are supposed to put Signs, Degrees every time a >> > pop up window appears stating that the sheet is protected, >> >> >> >> May you please check once and upload again >> >> >> >> Thank you >> >> >> >> >> >> best regards >> >> >> >> Karan >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> > > > -- ---

November 25, 2009

Dear All, See the attachment.Regards,Sreenadh-sreesogSent: 11/25/09 01:11 pm Subject: Re: Logevity - Jeevasarmeeya Ayu Dear All, I have updated the "Easy Calc.xls" excel sheet with the calculations for "Jeevasarmeeya Ayu" method for longevity calculation as well. Some interesting points are as follows - * If all 9 planets are considered the max longevity for Jeevasarmeeya Ayu is 120 years. (which we may consider as logical) * BUT Acharya Jeevasarma DO NOT ask us to consider Rahu and Ketu, and therefore the max. longevity as per this method is 93.33 years only! * Actually since Jeevasarma knew that Pindayu calculations are NOT giving correct results, this is his correction effort to that system by assigning equal longevity to all planets (13.33 years) and reducing the max longevity to 93.33 to be more in tune with the current usual longevty experienced by people. * Please note that Lagna, Rahu and Ketu are NOT considered in this system for longevity calculations. (But I have given the facility to consider these as well, if required, in the excel sheet on an experimental bais) I completely agree with the opinion of Acharya Jeevasarma regarding his correction effort and could see that if I apply the same on some known chart such as that of Rajiv Gandhi (for whom the the actual longevity was 46 years and 6 months), I get the result as - 46 years 8 months! An excellent match! I request you to experiment with this Longevity calculation method as well. Thus now we know that Amsayu and Jeevasarmeeya Ayu longevity calculation methods are more in tune with reality whereas Pindayu is not - yes, the conclusion is worth the effort! Longevity Harana (Deduction) Serial Planet Sign Degree Minute Max. Degree of Exaltation Longevity Years House Count Malefic Enemy house Combust Retrograde Vargottama / Swakshetra / Swamsa / Swa-Drekkana T1 T2 Std. Longevity Satru keshetra Moudhya Drishyartha Divisor Drishyartha Amsadi Lagnayu 1 Asc 0 0 0 0.00 1 N N N N N 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2 Su 4 3 4 570 13.33 1 Y N N N N 7384 3986 9.125 9.125 9.125 1.000 9.125 8.956 0.000 3 Mo 4 16 7 1950 13.33 1 N N Y N N 8167 4583 9.493 9.493 4.747 1.000 4.747 4.659 0.000 4 Ma 5 0 27 17850 13.33 2 Y Y N N N 9027 1977 7.885 5.257 5.257 1.000 5.257 5.159 0.000 5 Me 4 27 49 9870 13.33 1 Y N N N N 8869 9799 12.712 12.712 12.712 1.000 12.712 12.477 0.000 6 Ju 4 11 28 5670 13.33 1 N N Y N N 7888 8582 11.961 11.961 5.981 1.000 5.981 5.870 0.000 7 Ve 4 17 54 21390 13.33 1 N Y N N N 8274 2316 8.094 5.396 5.396 1.000 5.396 5.296 0.000 8 Sa 2 13 29 11970 13.33 11 Y N N N N 4409 3239 8.664 8.664 8.664 2.000 4.332 4.252 0.000 9 Ra 0 0 0 11970 0.00 0 Y N N N N 0 1170 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10 Ke 0 0 0 11970 0.00 0 Y N N N N 0 1170 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 93.3 67.934 62.608 51.881 0.000 47.549 46.668 0.000 Major Malefic in Lagna Y 46 8 0 Navamsa Count of Lagna 2 Maximum Expected Longevity = 46 Years 8 Months 0 Days Love and regards,Sreenadh - Vinay Gakkhar 11/19/09 03:30 pm Logevity Dear Sreenadh ji, I am using Excel 2000. Best regards, Vinay On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:20:05 +0530, sreesog <sreesog wrote: > Dear Vinay ji, > //> Why the previous file was working well at your end and giving difficulty on Karan ji's & my end// > That might be a problem with excel version both of us are using. I am using excel 2002; and I believe in excel 2000 to 2007 versions that sheet should work fine. Please share the version number of excel you are using; that info could be useful to me in my testing profession as well. > Love and regards, > Sreenadh > > , "Vinay Gakkhar." <vgakkhar wrote: >> >> Dear Sreenadh ji, >> >> Why the previous file was working well at your end and giving difficulty on Karan ji's & my end may not be so necessary to analyse now that the flaw is not there in this newly updated file, it is working well at my end, it should hopefully work well at Karan ji's end too. I will be careful not to edit values in cells other than the orange ones. >> >> Thanks for all that you are doing. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Vinay >> >> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:23:12 +0530, sreesog <sreesog wrote: >> >> > Dear Karan ji, >> > Since it is working fine at my end, I don't understand what is wrong >> > with the file. Anyway, I have unprotected the sheets and uploaded it >> > again. So please be careful, and don't edit the values in other cells; >> > otherwise the sheet will start giving erroneous results. >> > Love and regards, >> > Sreenadh >> > >> > , "Karan" <karan@> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear Sreenadh Ji >> >> >> >> I believe by mistake the orange cells also have been protected because >> > in the Cells wherein we are supposed to put Signs, Degrees every time a >> > pop up window appears stating that the sheet is protected, >> >> >> >> May you please check once and upload again >> >> >> >> Thank you >> >> >> >> >> >> best regards >> >> >> >> Karan >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> > > > -- ---