Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd:Planets-Own signs-moolatrikonas- Exaltation--Which classic is correct?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

kerala_vedic_astrology , " Vishnu " <vishnumohanalj

wrote:

 

Dear list

 

 

 

 

There is some difference between classical authors when dividing the rasis into

own signs,moolatrikona and exaltation points

 

 

 

 

To cite an example,Whenever we see Sun in simha we always say sun is in his own

house.same way when we see moon in taurus ,we always say it is exalted

 

 

 

DO we ever bother to see whether it is in moolatrikona? Here " we " refers to

most of the astrologers in internet,print media.There are very few who know the

correct usage of this and they are exceptions.

 

 

 

Of course,software writers take into consideration the moolatrikona,own house

etc as they need it to calcualte the " balas "

 

 

I would like to know which classic they follow and also which classic i should

follow for correct results?

 

 

Just to cite an example,

 

 

 

For venus

 

 

phaladeepika says

 

 

Libra 0-5 is moolatrikona

 

libra 6-30 is Own house

 

 

 

BPHS says

 

 

 

Libra 0-15 is moolatrikona

 

libra 16-30 is own house

 

 

 

 

Subramanya shastri in his notes for translation of sarvarth chintamani.I dont

think this view is from Sarvarth chintamani though.He should have taken this

from some other source i believe.

 

 

 

libra 0-10 is moolatrikona

 

Libra 11-30 is own sign

 

 

 

 

Similiarly for Jupiter,

 

 

 

Bphs and phaladeepika says

 

 

 

 

Dhanus 0-10 is moolatrikona

 

 

dhanus 11-30 is own house.

 

 

 

 

Subramanya Shastri says

 

 

 

dhanus 0-24 is moolatrikona

 

 

Dhanus 25-30 is own house

 

 

 

 

Even if we can ignore the subramanya shastri's data for Jupiter which still

makes a big difference,we cannot leave venus and thula for granted.

 

 

 

As for example,dasa of venus being in moolatrikona and being in own sign gives

different results according to Sarvarth chintamani.

 

 

 

Unfortunately,since i dont have the other classics with me now,i am unable to

refer them.

 

 

 

Clarification and suggestions are welcome.

 

 

 

I hope Sureshji will be able to help me in finding the correct value for the

planets.

 

 

 

 

Thanks and best wishes

 

vishnu

 

--- End forwarded message ---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...