A Parampara Dasa in the name of Lord Vishnu

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

Today I was going through the Sutramritam Blog of our dear Shanmukha ji

at:http://sutramritam.blogspot.com/2009/09/chara-dasa-update.html

The following comment attracted my attention. I had a hearty lagh. And so

sharing the same with you all here.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

======================================

A Parampara Dasa in the name of Lord Vishnu:

-----------

Next, the points are differing from a popular dasa in the name of Lord Vishnu as

advocated by a Parampara. Let us call it ND. I discuss this only for academic

purpose and I intend neither controversy intended nor defaming them.

The Paramapara unfortunately never discusses any standard Jaimini commentary in

their possession, nor quote them in their articles. One self claimed scholar of

that Parampara even writes that the students of the parampara not necessarily

read the ancient commentaries since their Gurudev has already done that and

tested them. He opines that reading other texts is Rajasic and perhaps reading

the books of their Gurudev works is Sattvic and sufficient for them.

 

One day, I was informed by one scholar of the Parampara that their Parampara

recognizes another Navamsa in the name of Somanatha Navamsa. I requested the

scholar to produce the relevant verse that gives the variation and he admitted

he didn't bother to learn about the source. So nice of him to admit. When I

offered him that the available, IMHO corrupted, verse of Somanatha, he never

turned up to discuss and they run a scholar program in the name of Sage Jaimini.

 

Sometime later, I requested another scholar of the same parampara about the

source of Somanatha Navamsa that their Parampara recently introduced in their

secret teachings. That scholar informed me that the name derived as Somanatha

since the ancestors of the Parampara were migrated from Gujarat and the linkage

with Somanatha temple. I can't help myself but knocking my head to the wall.

Then, I asked about Somanatha Drekkana, you know, the answer was obvious. The

scholar explained that for the very reason it was given by Somanatha.

 

And, the first scholar mentioned above, writes that their Parampara is a living

lineage of Jaimini and they fail to understand the source of Somanatha Navamsa

and its reckoning. Another scholar of the same parampara warns the students

about the Guru Chandala Yoga in the sky (which is not in reality since Jupiter

is retro in Capricorn and far away from Rahu) and its effect on Sage Jaimini

teachings.

======================================

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

The following is a beautiful comment that appeared in Sutramritam blog (by

'vivek'), for the below write-up. Enjoy!

Note: I don't have the email id of 'vivek', otherwise I would have invited him

to this group.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

==========================

Dear shanmukha

 

Guruchandala yoga matter-it was really funny .i am also an active reader of that

list.

 

In fact i sent many mails supporting you and refuting the comments of the Guru

couples of the organisation but none of them got published understandably.

 

It was nice when i read the basics from their basics as so far they have been

kind enough not to corrupt basic astrology.THeir advanced astrology in the name

of parampara which employes all the parameters in astrology under the sky to

explain a single event makes me forget whatever astrology i have learnt so far

from classical texts

 

If you havent read " Crux of Vedic astrology " .please get it from scribd.com for

free.In the first few pages you will see how the author has taken an example

chart and explained the number of coborns mixing principles of parasara and

jaimini emplying argalas and divisional chart.If you read it i bet you will

forget Jaimini astrology forever.

 

wish they have a crash course for parasara also by name MPUS so that whole

paramparic astrology can be learnt in 2+2 months by all of us.

 

Narasimha ji has now only realised that whatever he was taught is corrupted

astrology.

 

when you are free please try to convey the literal translation of shlokas i sent

to you with your expert opinion.Thanks

 

vivek

==========================

 

, " sreesog " <sreesog wrote:

>

> Dear All,

> Today I was going through the Sutramritam Blog of our dear Shanmukha ji

at:http://sutramritam.blogspot.com/2009/09/chara-dasa-update.html

> The following comment attracted my attention. I had a hearty lagh. And so

sharing the same with you all here.

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>

> ======================================

> A Parampara Dasa in the name of Lord Vishnu:

> -----------

> Next, the points are differing from a popular dasa in the name of Lord Vishnu

as advocated by a Parampara. Let us call it ND. I discuss this only for academic

purpose and I intend neither controversy intended nor defaming them.

> The Paramapara unfortunately never discusses any standard Jaimini commentary

in their possession, nor quote them in their articles. One self claimed scholar

of that Parampara even writes that the students of the parampara not necessarily

read the ancient commentaries since their Gurudev has already done that and

tested them. He opines that reading other texts is Rajasic and perhaps reading

the books of their Gurudev works is Sattvic and sufficient for them.

>

> One day, I was informed by one scholar of the Parampara that their Parampara

recognizes another Navamsa in the name of Somanatha Navamsa. I requested the

scholar to produce the relevant verse that gives the variation and he admitted

he didn't bother to learn about the source. So nice of him to admit. When I

offered him that the available, IMHO corrupted, verse of Somanatha, he never

turned up to discuss and they run a scholar program in the name of Sage Jaimini.

>

> Sometime later, I requested another scholar of the same parampara about the

source of Somanatha Navamsa that their Parampara recently introduced in their

secret teachings. That scholar informed me that the name derived as Somanatha

since the ancestors of the Parampara were migrated from Gujarat and the linkage

with Somanatha temple. I can't help myself but knocking my head to the wall.

Then, I asked about Somanatha Drekkana, you know, the answer was obvious. The

scholar explained that for the very reason it was given by Somanatha.

>

> And, the first scholar mentioned above, writes that their Parampara is a

living lineage of Jaimini and they fail to understand the source of Somanatha

Navamsa and its reckoning. Another scholar of the same parampara warns the

students about the Guru Chandala Yoga in the sky (which is not in reality since

Jupiter is retro in Capricorn and far away from Rahu) and its effect on Sage

Jaimini teachings.

> ======================================

>

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

The response given to Vivek by Shanmukha ji (given below) contained a

beautiful statement, which echos our sentiments as well. The statement reads -

//Remember, we are reconstructing a Science, which is drastically different from

the knowledge available in the media (Paper and electronic).//

I loved that statement and so sharing it with you all. I would say, Shanmukha

ji was 100% correct in that statement! Absolutely! That statement comes from

experience, hard-work and sincere research. One who do not have 'sincere direct

experience' on such 'reconstruction efforts' CANNOT make such a statement for

sure - I bet. I was echoing my mind! With the only difference he is into Jaimini

school and I am after Arsha school of astrology.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

=============================

Dear Vivek,

 

Thanks for your support for the cause of Astrology.

 

I read COVA and that's where I learnt how to apply and how not to apply as well.

 

The case with Sri Narasimha is totally different and time will prove his

findings whatever worth.

 

Your sloka has been always in my mind and I will get back to you in a couple of

days.

 

Coming to Chara Dasa variations, I have given the original verses and

explanation on this blog as well. My strong suggestion to you is not to loose

heart. Remember, we are reconstructing a Science, which is drastically different

from the knowledge available in the media (Paper and electronic).

 

Can you send me the charts to my mail a I am also experimenting?

=============================

 

, " sreesog " <sreesog wrote:

>

> Dear All,

> The following is a beautiful comment that appeared in Sutramritam blog (by

'vivek'), for the below write-up. Enjoy!

> Note: I don't have the email id of 'vivek', otherwise I would have invited him

to this group.

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>

> ==========================

> Dear shanmukha

>

> Guruchandala yoga matter-it was really funny .i am also an active reader of

that list.

>

> In fact i sent many mails supporting you and refuting the comments of the Guru

couples of the organisation but none of them got published understandably.

>

> It was nice when i read the basics from their basics as so far they have been

kind enough not to corrupt basic astrology.THeir advanced astrology in the name

of parampara which employes all the parameters in astrology under the sky to

explain a single event makes me forget whatever astrology i have learnt so far

from classical texts

>

> If you havent read " Crux of Vedic astrology " .please get it from scribd.com for

free.In the first few pages you will see how the author has taken an example

chart and explained the number of coborns mixing principles of parasara and

jaimini emplying argalas and divisional chart.If you read it i bet you will

forget Jaimini astrology forever.

>

> wish they have a crash course for parasara also by name MPUS so that whole

paramparic astrology can be learnt in 2+2 months by all of us.

>

> Narasimha ji has now only realised that whatever he was taught is corrupted

astrology.

>

> when you are free please try to convey the literal translation of shlokas i

sent to you with your expert opinion.Thanks

>

> vivek

> ==========================

>

> , " sreesog " <sreesog@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear All,

> > Today I was going through the Sutramritam Blog of our dear Shanmukha ji

at:http://sutramritam.blogspot.com/2009/09/chara-dasa-update.html

> > The following comment attracted my attention. I had a hearty lagh. And

so sharing the same with you all here.

> > Love and regards,

> > Sreenadh

> >

> > ======================================

> > A Parampara Dasa in the name of Lord Vishnu:

> > -----------

> > Next, the points are differing from a popular dasa in the name of Lord

Vishnu as advocated by a Parampara. Let us call it ND. I discuss this only for

academic purpose and I intend neither controversy intended nor defaming them.

> > The Paramapara unfortunately never discusses any standard Jaimini commentary

in their possession, nor quote them in their articles. One self claimed scholar

of that Parampara even writes that the students of the parampara not necessarily

read the ancient commentaries since their Gurudev has already done that and

tested them. He opines that reading other texts is Rajasic and perhaps reading

the books of their Gurudev works is Sattvic and sufficient for them.

> >

> > One day, I was informed by one scholar of the Parampara that their Parampara

recognizes another Navamsa in the name of Somanatha Navamsa. I requested the

scholar to produce the relevant verse that gives the variation and he admitted

he didn't bother to learn about the source. So nice of him to admit. When I

offered him that the available, IMHO corrupted, verse of Somanatha, he never

turned up to discuss and they run a scholar program in the name of Sage Jaimini.

> >

> > Sometime later, I requested another scholar of the same parampara about the

source of Somanatha Navamsa that their Parampara recently introduced in their

secret teachings. That scholar informed me that the name derived as Somanatha

since the ancestors of the Parampara were migrated from Gujarat and the linkage

with Somanatha temple. I can't help myself but knocking my head to the wall.

Then, I asked about Somanatha Drekkana, you know, the answer was obvious. The

scholar explained that for the very reason it was given by Somanatha.

> >

> > And, the first scholar mentioned above, writes that their Parampara is a

living lineage of Jaimini and they fail to understand the source of Somanatha

Navamsa and its reckoning. Another scholar of the same parampara warns the

students about the Guru Chandala Yoga in the sky (which is not in reality since

Jupiter is retro in Capricorn and far away from Rahu) and its effect on Sage

Jaimini teachings.

> > ======================================

> >

>

[Guest guest]

|| Jaya Jaya Jagannatha ||

 

 

Guru Chandala Yoga is funny ????

 

Please type in the search engine " Guru Chandala Yoga "

 

Then you will read a lot of stuff written by hundreds of astrologers.

 

Many of them are not from the school of Sanjay Rath.

 

ABOUT RAHU :

 

Please Refer Dr. B.V. Ramnn Book " Three Hundred Important Combinations Page

288 " Pisacha Yoga " you might understand the role of RAHU. ( Pisacha means

sprits due to the previous birth Karma )

 

 

 

Remember Dr.BVR didn't study nothing from Sanjaji.

 

 

sarasalai_siva

 

 

 

 

, " sreesog " <sreesog wrote:

>

> Dear All,

> The response given to Vivek by Shanmukha ji (given below) contained a

beautiful statement, which echos our sentiments as well. The statement reads -

//Remember, we are reconstructing a Science, which is drastically different from

the knowledge available in the media (Paper and electronic).//

> I loved that statement and so sharing it with you all. I would say,

Shanmukha ji was 100% correct in that statement! Absolutely! That statement

comes from experience, hard-work and sincere research. One who do not have

'sincere direct experience' on such 'reconstruction efforts' CANNOT make such a

statement for sure - I bet. I was echoing my mind! With the only difference he

is into Jaimini school and I am after Arsha school of astrology.

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>

> =============================

> Dear Vivek,

>

> Thanks for your support for the cause of Astrology.

>

> I read COVA and that's where I learnt how to apply and how not to apply as

well.

>

> The case with Sri Narasimha is totally different and time will prove his

findings whatever worth.

>

> Your sloka has been always in my mind and I will get back to you in a couple

of days.

>

> Coming to Chara Dasa variations, I have given the original verses and

explanation on this blog as well. My strong suggestion to you is not to loose

heart. Remember, we are reconstructing a Science, which is drastically different

from the knowledge available in the media (Paper and electronic).

>

> Can you send me the charts to my mail a I am also experimenting?

> =============================

>

> , " sreesog " <sreesog@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear All,

> > The following is a beautiful comment that appeared in Sutramritam blog (by

'vivek'), for the below write-up. Enjoy!

> > Note: I don't have the email id of 'vivek', otherwise I would have invited

him to this group.

> > Love and regards,

> > Sreenadh

> >

> > ==========================

> > Dear shanmukha

> >

> > Guruchandala yoga matter-it was really funny .i am also an active reader of

that list.

> >

> > In fact i sent many mails supporting you and refuting the comments of the

Guru couples of the organisation but none of them got published understandably.

> >

> > It was nice when i read the basics from their basics as so far they have

been kind enough not to corrupt basic astrology.THeir advanced astrology in the

name of parampara which employes all the parameters in astrology under the sky

to explain a single event makes me forget whatever astrology i have learnt so

far from classical texts

> >

> > If you havent read " Crux of Vedic astrology " .please get it from scribd.com

for free.In the first few pages you will see how the author has taken an example

chart and explained the number of coborns mixing principles of parasara and

jaimini emplying argalas and divisional chart.If you read it i bet you will

forget Jaimini astrology forever.

> >

> > wish they have a crash course for parasara also by name MPUS so that whole

paramparic astrology can be learnt in 2+2 months by all of us.

> >

> > Narasimha ji has now only realised that whatever he was taught is corrupted

astrology.

> >

> > when you are free please try to convey the literal translation of shlokas i

sent to you with your expert opinion.Thanks

> >

> > vivek

> > ==========================

> >

> > , " sreesog " <sreesog@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear All,

> > > Today I was going through the Sutramritam Blog of our dear Shanmukha ji

at:http://sutramritam.blogspot.com/2009/09/chara-dasa-update.html

> > > The following comment attracted my attention. I had a hearty lagh.

And so sharing the same with you all here.

> > > Love and regards,

> > > Sreenadh

> > >

> > > ======================================

> > > A Parampara Dasa in the name of Lord Vishnu:

> > > -----------

> > > Next, the points are differing from a popular dasa in the name of Lord

Vishnu as advocated by a Parampara. Let us call it ND. I discuss this only for

academic purpose and I intend neither controversy intended nor defaming them.

> > > The Paramapara unfortunately never discusses any standard Jaimini

commentary in their possession, nor quote them in their articles. One self

claimed scholar of that Parampara even writes that the students of the parampara

not necessarily read the ancient commentaries since their Gurudev has already

done that and tested them. He opines that reading other texts is Rajasic and

perhaps reading the books of their Gurudev works is Sattvic and sufficient for

them.

> > >

> > > One day, I was informed by one scholar of the Parampara that their

Parampara recognizes another Navamsa in the name of Somanatha Navamsa. I

requested the scholar to produce the relevant verse that gives the variation and

he admitted he didn't bother to learn about the source. So nice of him to admit.

When I offered him that the available, IMHO corrupted, verse of Somanatha, he

never turned up to discuss and they run a scholar program in the name of Sage

Jaimini.

> > >

> > > Sometime later, I requested another scholar of the same parampara about

the source of Somanatha Navamsa that their Parampara recently introduced in

their secret teachings. That scholar informed me that the name derived as

Somanatha since the ancestors of the Parampara were migrated from Gujarat and

the linkage with Somanatha temple. I can't help myself but knocking my head to

the wall. Then, I asked about Somanatha Drekkana, you know, the answer was

obvious. The scholar explained that for the very reason it was given by

Somanatha.

> > >

> > > And, the first scholar mentioned above, writes that their Parampara is a

living lineage of Jaimini and they fail to understand the source of Somanatha

Navamsa and its reckoning. Another scholar of the same parampara warns the

students about the Guru Chandala Yoga in the sky (which is not in reality since

Jupiter is retro in Capricorn and far away from Rahu) and its effect on Sage

Jaimini teachings.

> > > ======================================

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Om Namash Sivaya

 

Namaste Sri Sarasalai_Siva,

 

Probably, you didn't understand it. Sri Vivek didn't mean Guru Chandala Yoga is

funny. He meant the discussion held on Sohamsa group regarding Guru Chandala

yoga happening at that time was funny. He meant the Guru Chandaya Yoga never

occured at that time and that it.

 

BTW, it doesn't matter who wrote about it, but the content and its theoritical

base and practical utility.

 

Regards,

Shanmukha

 

, " sivagnanalingam "

<sarasalai_siva wrote:

>

>

> || Jaya Jaya Jagannatha ||

>

>

> Guru Chandala Yoga is funny ????

>

> Please type in the search engine " Guru Chandala Yoga "

>

> Then you will read a lot of stuff written by hundreds of astrologers.

>

> Many of them are not from the school of Sanjay Rath.

>

> ABOUT RAHU :

>

> Please Refer Dr. B.V. Ramnn Book " Three Hundred Important Combinations Page

288 " Pisacha Yoga " you might understand the role of RAHU. ( Pisacha means

sprits due to the previous birth Karma )

>

>

>

> Remember Dr.BVR didn't study nothing from Sanjaji.

>

>

> sarasalai_siva

>

>

>

>

> , " sreesog " <sreesog@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear All,

> > The response given to Vivek by Shanmukha ji (given below) contained a

beautiful statement, which echos our sentiments as well. The statement reads -

//Remember, we are reconstructing a Science, which is drastically different from

the knowledge available in the media (Paper and electronic).//

> > I loved that statement and so sharing it with you all. I would say,

Shanmukha ji was 100% correct in that statement! Absolutely! That statement

comes from experience, hard-work and sincere research. One who do not have

'sincere direct experience' on such 'reconstruction efforts' CANNOT make such a

statement for sure - I bet. I was echoing my mind! With the only difference he

is into Jaimini school and I am after Arsha school of astrology.

> > Love and regards,

> > Sreenadh

> >

> > =============================

> > Dear Vivek,

> >

> > Thanks for your support for the cause of Astrology.

> >

> > I read COVA and that's where I learnt how to apply and how not to apply as

well.

> >

> > The case with Sri Narasimha is totally different and time will prove his

findings whatever worth.

> >

> > Your sloka has been always in my mind and I will get back to you in a couple

of days.

> >

> > Coming to Chara Dasa variations, I have given the original verses and

explanation on this blog as well. My strong suggestion to you is not to loose

heart. Remember, we are reconstructing a Science, which is drastically different

from the knowledge available in the media (Paper and electronic).

> >

> > Can you send me the charts to my mail a I am also experimenting?

> > =============================

> >

> > , " sreesog " <sreesog@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear All,

> > > The following is a beautiful comment that appeared in Sutramritam blog

(by 'vivek'), for the below write-up. Enjoy!

> > > Note: I don't have the email id of 'vivek', otherwise I would have invited

him to this group.

> > > Love and regards,

> > > Sreenadh

> > >

> > > ==========================

> > > Dear shanmukha

> > >

> > > Guruchandala yoga matter-it was really funny .i am also an active reader

of that list.

> > >

> > > In fact i sent many mails supporting you and refuting the comments of the

Guru couples of the organisation but none of them got published understandably.

> > >

> > > It was nice when i read the basics from their basics as so far they have

been kind enough not to corrupt basic astrology.THeir advanced astrology in the

name of parampara which employes all the parameters in astrology under the sky

to explain a single event makes me forget whatever astrology i have learnt so

far from classical texts

> > >

> > > If you havent read " Crux of Vedic astrology " .please get it from scribd.com

for free.In the first few pages you will see how the author has taken an example

chart and explained the number of coborns mixing principles of parasara and

jaimini emplying argalas and divisional chart.If you read it i bet you will

forget Jaimini astrology forever.

> > >

> > > wish they have a crash course for parasara also by name MPUS so that whole

paramparic astrology can be learnt in 2+2 months by all of us.

> > >

> > > Narasimha ji has now only realised that whatever he was taught is

corrupted astrology.

> > >

> > > when you are free please try to convey the literal translation of shlokas

i sent to you with your expert opinion.Thanks

> > >

> > > vivek

> > > ==========================

> > >

> > > , " sreesog " <sreesog@>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear All,

> > > > Today I was going through the Sutramritam Blog of our dear Shanmukha

ji at:http://sutramritam.blogspot.com/2009/09/chara-dasa-update.html

> > > > The following comment attracted my attention. I had a hearty lagh.

And so sharing the same with you all here.

> > > > Love and regards,

> > > > Sreenadh

> > > >

> > > > ======================================

> > > > A Parampara Dasa in the name of Lord Vishnu:

> > > > -----------

> > > > Next, the points are differing from a popular dasa in the name of Lord

Vishnu as advocated by a Parampara. Let us call it ND. I discuss this only for

academic purpose and I intend neither controversy intended nor defaming them.

> > > > The Paramapara unfortunately never discusses any standard Jaimini

commentary in their possession, nor quote them in their articles. One self

claimed scholar of that Parampara even writes that the students of the parampara

not necessarily read the ancient commentaries since their Gurudev has already

done that and tested them. He opines that reading other texts is Rajasic and

perhaps reading the books of their Gurudev works is Sattvic and sufficient for

them.

> > > >

> > > > One day, I was informed by one scholar of the Parampara that their

Parampara recognizes another Navamsa in the name of Somanatha Navamsa. I

requested the scholar to produce the relevant verse that gives the variation and

he admitted he didn't bother to learn about the source. So nice of him to admit.

When I offered him that the available, IMHO corrupted, verse of Somanatha, he

never turned up to discuss and they run a scholar program in the name of Sage

Jaimini.

> > > >

> > > > Sometime later, I requested another scholar of the same parampara about

the source of Somanatha Navamsa that their Parampara recently introduced in

their secret teachings. That scholar informed me that the name derived as

Somanatha since the ancestors of the Parampara were migrated from Gujarat and

the linkage with Somanatha temple. I can't help myself but knocking my head to

the wall. Then, I asked about Somanatha Drekkana, you know, the answer was

obvious. The scholar explained that for the very reason it was given by

Somanatha.

> > > >

> > > > And, the first scholar mentioned above, writes that their Parampara is a

living lineage of Jaimini and they fail to understand the source of Somanatha

Navamsa and its reckoning. Another scholar of the same parampara warns the

students about the Guru Chandala Yoga in the sky (which is not in reality since

Jupiter is retro in Capricorn and far away from Rahu) and its effect on Sage

Jaimini teachings.

> > > > ======================================

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Siva ji,

//> Guru Chandala Yoga is funny ????

> Please type in the search engine " Guru Chandala Yoga "

> Then you will read a lot of stuff written by hundreds of astrologers.//

Unlike some other groups, it is not some net only foreign

astrologers/individuals who are sitting here. Many members present here are well

learned in classics and don't need a search engine to check the relevant

references. They got huge libraries and almost all available astrological

classics at their disposal. Me, Shanmukha ji, Satya Prakash ji, Bhaskar ji,

Neelam ji etc won't be an exception to this. We don't learn astrology from

searches, but instead we learn astrology from gurus and books and share it in

the net for and google searches to find. We are in this end (providing

end) and you are in that end (searching end).

For example please try to answer this question. Which is the text that uses

the term 'Guru-Chandala Yoga'? A term which has become your favorite now. Try

all your and Google searches, if you find the answer it is well and good.

But if you don't find an answer to us, then come back to us, we will provide you

with an answer with reference quote. Then you can go back and share it in the

net for others to search and find. Wish you good luck.

OK. Once you find some answer to the above question, then quote the relevant

sloka from that text and tell us something about that text - such as who wrote

it, what is its period of origin, what is the subject dealt within that text,

what are the other interesting quotes that you found in that text etc etc. If

you are able to do so, certainly it would be much informative. Hope you see -

what I mean. The point is here in this group, you are dealing with a different

class of individuals (The SJC teachings will not help much here); you will have

to speak our language of quoting authentic references (from asto classics) and

speaking based on the same only.

Don't quote Sanjay Rath, BV Raman Santanum, KN Rao etc etc. But instead first

quote Rishi Horas, Brihat Jataka, BPHS, Jaimini Sutra, Phala deepika etc etc -

the original astro classics, and speak based on the same; just the way the

scholars and interpreters of the first list will do. We don't need, don't depend

on, or don't appreciate 'secondary' references if not supported by a primary

reference from astro classics. If primary reference available and quoted then

the secondary reference has an added value - otherwise not. Hope this helps.

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

, " sivagnanalingam "

<sarasalai_siva wrote:

>

>

> || Jaya Jaya Jagannatha ||

>

>

> Guru Chandala Yoga is funny ????

>

> Please type in the search engine " Guru Chandala Yoga "

>

> Then you will read a lot of stuff written by hundreds of astrologers.

>

> Many of them are not from the school of Sanjay Rath.

>

> ABOUT RAHU :

>

> Please Refer Dr. B.V. Ramnn Book " Three Hundred Important Combinations Page

288 " Pisacha Yoga " you might understand the role of RAHU. ( Pisacha means

sprits due to the previous birth Karma )

>

>

>

> Remember Dr.BVR didn't study nothing from Sanjaji.

>

>

> sarasalai_siva