Members_Upgraded - updated list of UN-MODERATED members

[Guest guest]

Dear All, The updated list of UN-MODERATED members are given below. I request them to be more careful in their conversations, since there is none to moderate them except themselves. We consider them as responsible mature members. 1) GOPI 2) Shankar Bhardwaj 3) Anita 4) K Gopu 5) Shanmukha

6) (id: gaurav.ghosh)7) Axeplex (Dev!) 8) Pandit Arjun9) Sheevani 10) Deepak

Sharma 11) Girish Menon 12) Vishnu Mohan 13) Santosh14) Sarajit Poddar (id: sarajitp)15) Phyillis Chubb (id: pchubb03)16) Finn Wandahl (id: finn_wandahl)17) Ernst Wilhelm (id: ERNSTW )

18) Sanjay Rath (id: srath)19) PVR Narasimha Raho (id: pvr108)20) Vijayadas Pradeep21) Kiran Rama22) Kishore Patnaik23) Chakraborty24) Satya Prakash25) Sunil Bhattacharjya26) Vinita Kumar

27) Vijay Goel28) Dhanapal T 29) Panditji (id: doctorketkar)30) Renu (id: renunw)31) Chiranjiv Mehta32) Sairam Nat (id: sairaman53)33) Ramesh Mishra (id: aarceemastro2002)33) Col. Chandran (id: colchandran)

34) M S Bohar (id: msbohra62)35) Satpal Khurana (id: khurana_satpal)36) Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj (id: nirbhar)37) SC Kursija 38) Liana Sandru (id: blulisan)39) prafulla Vaman Mendki (id: prafulla_mendki)

40)

Dhananjayan Brahma (id: abhanaya)41) Dhanapal Logic42) Bhaskar 43) Ash (KAS)44) Chandrahari45) Manoj Kumar (id: mouji99) Love and regards,Sreenadh , "Sre_eram" <sreeram64 wrote:>> Namaste,> > It is time that we upgrade some of the members who have been in the> group for considerable time and shared their knowledgebase with all> others - hence forth these member's messages would be UNMODERATED.> > 1) Bhaskar> 2) Sheevani,> 3) Shanmukha> 4) Shankar Bharadwaj> 5) Arjun Pandit> 6) Gopi> 7) Anita> 8) > > Any negative or adverse remarks made by them should be read and> attributed to those individuals posting the message than to the group> itself. We presume that the individuals are matured and take> responsibilities for their postings. Any deviation or violation to> good group etiquette would ensure that the messages or membership would> be back to original status of being moderated. Depending upon the> nature of transgression of good behavior, the member may even be banned.> > A word of suggestion to Members who are in the list - take time to post> your messages and ensure the sensitivities of the group or individuals> are adequately taken care. Personal differences if any be limited to> the subject itself. In NO case, they should extend the boundaries> beyond the subject thread. Personal attacks are strictly NOT ALLOWED.> If members are interested in Personal attacks they are advised to do the> same OFFLINE.> > The groups motto has always been> > 1. Let the best logic win the discussion and debate> 2. Show your age in being polite in your messages> 3. Show your prowess in your astro_content> 4. Show your maturity in your judgment of planets, nakshatras,> signs...etc. (than judging individual member's conduct or behavior !!)> 5. All school of astro_thoughts are encouraged> 6. All are free to disagree> 7. There are NO gurus in the group....other than the original RISHIS> themselves who gave us the greatest or superior wisdom in the subject of> astrology> 8. Every new member should give his own astro_introduction so that> others can appreciate it - School of thought, Jyotish Teacher/Guru (to> all of us, there is NONE in the current recent history who can be given> the title of GURU ....for they all utmost qualify - Jyotish Teacher)> 9. Every known astrologer has his own contribution to the subject and> are respected in the group irrespective of their background and other> vices> 10. Let us GROW old than getting OLD !!> > Help us to become a matured group.> > A word of thanks to Neelam ji for giving us the idea and she deserves> immense credit for the time she spent in the group sharing her energetic> inputs.> > With regards,> Sreeram_Srinivas>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadh ji,wow,so many...great.Love and regards,gopi. , "sreesog" <sreesog wrote:>> Dear All,> The updated list of UN-MODERATED members are given below. I request> them to be more careful in their conversations, since there is none to > moderate them except themselves. We consider them as responsible mature> members.> > 1) GOPI> 2) Shankar Bhardwaj> 3) Anita> 4) K Gopu> 5) Shanmukha> 6) (id: gaurav.ghosh)> 7) Axeplex (Dev!)> 8) Pandit Arjun> 9) Sheevani> 10) Deepak Sharma> 11) Girish Menon> 12) Vishnu Mohan> 13) Santosh> 14) Sarajit Poddar (id: sarajitp)> 15) Phyillis Chubb (id: pchubb03)> 16) Finn Wandahl (id: finn_wandahl)> 17) Ernst Wilhelm (id: ERNSTW )> 18) Sanjay Rath (id: srath)> 19) PVR Narasimha Raho (id: pvr108)> 20) Vijayadas Pradeep> 21) Kiran Rama> 22) Kishore Patnaik> 23) Chakraborty> 24) Satya Prakash> 25) Sunil Bhattacharjya> 26) Vinita Kumar> 27) Vijay Goel> 28) Dhanapal T> 29) Panditji (id: doctorketkar)> 30) Renu (id: renunw)> 31) Chiranjiv Mehta> 32) Sairam Nat (id: sairaman53)> 33) Ramesh Mishra (id: aarceemastro2002)> 33) Col. Chandran (id: colchandran)> 34) M S Bohar (id: msbohra62)> 35) Satpal Khurana (id: khurana_satpal)> 36) Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj (id: nirbhar)> 37) SC Kursija> 38) Liana Sandru (id: blulisan)> 39) prafulla Vaman Mendki (id: prafulla_mendki)> 40) Dhananjayan Brahma (id: abhanaya)> 41) Dhanapal Logic> 42) Bhaskar> 43) Ash (KAS)> 44) Chandrahari> 45) Manoj Kumar (id: mouji99)> > Love and regards,> Sreenadh> > , "Sre_eram"> sreeram64@ wrote:> >> > Namaste,> >> > It is time that we upgrade some of the members who have been in the> > group for considerable time and shared their knowledgebase with all> > others - hence forth these member's messages would be UNMODERATED.> >> > 1) Bhaskar> > 2) Sheevani,> > 3) Shanmukha> > 4) Shankar Bharadwaj> > 5) Arjun Pandit> > 6) Gopi> > 7) Anita> > 8) > >> > Any negative or adverse remarks made by them should be read and> > attributed to those individuals posting the message than to the group> > itself. We presume that the individuals are matured and take> > responsibilities for their postings. Any deviation or violation to> > good group etiquette would ensure that the messages or membership> would> > be back to original status of being moderated. Depending upon the> > nature of transgression of good behavior, the member may even be> banned.> >> > A word of suggestion to Members who are in the list - take time to> post> > your messages and ensure the sensitivities of the group or individuals> > are adequately taken care. Personal differences if any be limited to> > the subject itself. In NO case, they should extend the boundaries> > beyond the subject thread. Personal attacks are strictly NOT> ALLOWED.> > If members are interested in Personal attacks they are advised to do> the> > same OFFLINE.> >> > The groups motto has always been> >> > 1. Let the best logic win the discussion and debate> > 2. Show your age in being polite in your messages> > 3. Show your prowess in your astro_content> > 4. Show your maturity in your judgment of planets, nakshatras,> > signs...etc. (than judging individual member's conduct or behavior> !!)> > 5. All school of astro_thoughts are encouraged> > 6. All are free to disagree> > 7. There are NO gurus in the group....other than the original> RISHIS> > themselves who gave us the greatest or superior wisdom in the subject> of> > astrology> > 8. Every new member should give his own astro_introduction so that> > others can appreciate it - School of thought, Jyotish Teacher/Guru > (to> > all of us, there is NONE in the current recent history who can be> given> > the title of GURU ....for they all utmost qualify - Jyotish Teacher)> > 9. Every known astrologer has his own contribution to the subject> and> > are respected in the group irrespective of their background and other> > vices> > 10. Let us GROW old than getting OLD !!> >> > Help us to become a matured group.> >> > A word of thanks to Neelam ji for giving us the idea and she deserves> > immense credit for the time she spent in the group sharing her> energetic> > inputs.> >> > With regards,> > Sreeram_Srinivas> >>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadh ji,

 

Great. Now this will become like a Court and a garden where many can

communicate as and when they want and responses can come immediately.

this is also good for those like me who sleep late at night and I have

nobody to talk to (Since my wife is asleep when I am awake). Those

members who are awake at night can converse freely.

 

Another point. In a Kings court one person always has better advantages

and can reach even the inner corridors and can talk whenever he wants

and whatever he wants like Birbal, or like a court jester. This man is

normally allowed to get away with many atrocities he commits in name of

" Wiseness " or " Humour " . I hope I am treated in this manner so that I can

maintain my natural flow without apprehensions.

 

Your take now.

 

love and regards,

 

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

ogroups.com, " sreesog " <sreesog wrote:

>

> Dear All,

> The updated list of UN-MODERATED members are given below. I request

> them to be more careful in their conversations, since there is none to

> moderate them except themselves. We consider them as responsible

mature

> members.

>

> 1) GOPI

> 2) Shankar Bhardwaj

> 3) Anita

> 4) K Gopu

> 5) Shanmukha

> 6) (id: gaurav.ghosh)

> 7) Axeplex (Dev!)

> 8) Pandit Arjun

> 9) Sheevani

> 10) Deepak Sharma

> 11) Girish Menon

> 12) Vishnu Mohan

> 13) Santosh

> 14) Sarajit Poddar (id: sarajitp)

> 15) Phyillis Chubb (id: pchubb03)

> 16) Finn Wandahl (id: finn_wandahl)

> 17) Ernst Wilhelm (id: ERNSTW )

> 18) Sanjay Rath (id: srath)

> 19) PVR Narasimha Raho (id: pvr108)

> 20) Vijayadas Pradeep

> 21) Kiran Rama

> 22) Kishore Patnaik

> 23) Chakraborty

> 24) Satya Prakash

> 25) Sunil Bhattacharjya

> 26) Vinita Kumar

> 27) Vijay Goel

> 28) Dhanapal T

> 29) Panditji (id: doctorketkar)

> 30) Renu (id: renunw)

> 31) Chiranjiv Mehta

> 32) Sairam Nat (id: sairaman53)

> 33) Ramesh Mishra (id: aarceemastro2002)

> 33) Col. Chandran (id: colchandran)

> 34) M S Bohar (id: msbohra62)

> 35) Satpal Khurana (id: khurana_satpal)

> 36) Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj (id: nirbhar)

> 37) SC Kursija

> 38) Liana Sandru (id: blulisan)

> 39) prafulla Vaman Mendki (id: prafulla_mendki)

> 40) Dhananjayan Brahma (id: abhanaya)

> 41) Dhanapal Logic

> 42) Bhaskar

> 43) Ash (KAS)

> 44) Chandrahari

> 45) Manoj Kumar (id: mouji99)

>

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>

> , " Sre_eram "

> sreeram64@ wrote:

> >

> > Namaste,

> >

> > It is time that we upgrade some of the members who have been in the

> > group for considerable time and shared their knowledgebase with all

> > others - hence forth these member's messages would be UNMODERATED.

> >

> > 1) Bhaskar

> > 2) Sheevani,

> > 3) Shanmukha

> > 4) Shankar Bharadwaj

> > 5) Arjun Pandit

> > 6) Gopi

> > 7) Anita

> > 8)

> >

> > Any negative or adverse remarks made by them should be read and

> > attributed to those individuals posting the message than to the

group

> > itself. We presume that the individuals are matured and take

> > responsibilities for their postings. Any deviation or violation to

> > good group etiquette would ensure that the messages or membership

> would

> > be back to original status of being moderated. Depending upon the

> > nature of transgression of good behavior, the member may even be

> banned.

> >

> > A word of suggestion to Members who are in the list - take time to

> post

> > your messages and ensure the sensitivities of the group or

individuals

> > are adequately taken care. Personal differences if any be limited to

> > the subject itself. In NO case, they should extend the boundaries

> > beyond the subject thread. Personal attacks are strictly NOT

> ALLOWED.

> > If members are interested in Personal attacks they are advised to do

> the

> > same OFFLINE.

> >

> > The groups motto has always been

> >

> > 1. Let the best logic win the discussion and debate

> > 2. Show your age in being polite in your messages

> > 3. Show your prowess in your astro_content

> > 4. Show your maturity in your judgment of planets, nakshatras,

> > signs...etc. (than judging individual member's conduct or behavior

> !!)

> > 5. All school of astro_thoughts are encouraged

> > 6. All are free to disagree

> > 7. There are NO gurus in the group....other than the original

> RISHIS

> > themselves who gave us the greatest or superior wisdom in the

subject

> of

> > astrology

> > 8. Every new member should give his own astro_introduction so that

> > others can appreciate it - School of thought, Jyotish Teacher/Guru

> (to

> > all of us, there is NONE in the current recent history who can be

> given

> > the title of GURU ....for they all utmost qualify - Jyotish Teacher)

> > 9. Every known astrologer has his own contribution to the subject

> and

> > are respected in the group irrespective of their background and

other

> > vices

> > 10. Let us GROW old than getting OLD !!

> >

> > Help us to become a matured group.

> >

> > A word of thanks to Neelam ji for giving us the idea and she

deserves

> > immense credit for the time she spent in the group sharing her

> energetic

> > inputs.

> >

> > With regards,

> > Sreeram_Srinivas

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear sirs,

 

I am not sure but it would also be helpful if the unmoderated members

are able to put their contact details in the Files section, so that we

know that we are conversing with real people. They need not mention

their Phone numbers if they wish not to, but could at same time give as

much info as could seem authentic and dependable.

 

regards/Bhaskar.

 

 

, " sreesog " <sreesog

wrote:

>

> Dear All,

> The updated list of UN-MODERATED members are given below. I request

> them to be more careful in their conversations, since there is none to

> moderate them except themselves. We consider them as responsible

mature

> members.

>

> 1) GOPI

> 2) Shankar Bhardwaj

> 3) Anita

> 4) K Gopu

> 5) Shanmukha

> 6) (id: gaurav.ghosh)

> 7) Axeplex (Dev!)

> 8) Pandit Arjun

> 9) Sheevani

> 10) Deepak Sharma

> 11) Girish Menon

> 12) Vishnu Mohan

> 13) Santosh

> 14) Sarajit Poddar (id: sarajitp)

> 15) Phyillis Chubb (id: pchubb03)

> 16) Finn Wandahl (id: finn_wandahl)

> 17) Ernst Wilhelm (id: ERNSTW )

> 18) Sanjay Rath (id: srath)

> 19) PVR Narasimha Raho (id: pvr108)

> 20) Vijayadas Pradeep

> 21) Kiran Rama

> 22) Kishore Patnaik

> 23) Chakraborty

> 24) Satya Prakash

> 25) Sunil Bhattacharjya

> 26) Vinita Kumar

> 27) Vijay Goel

> 28) Dhanapal T

> 29) Panditji (id: doctorketkar)

> 30) Renu (id: renunw)

> 31) Chiranjiv Mehta

> 32) Sairam Nat (id: sairaman53)

> 33) Ramesh Mishra (id: aarceemastro2002)

> 33) Col. Chandran (id: colchandran)

> 34) M S Bohar (id: msbohra62)

> 35) Satpal Khurana (id: khurana_satpal)

> 36) Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj (id: nirbhar)

> 37) SC Kursija

> 38) Liana Sandru (id: blulisan)

> 39) prafulla Vaman Mendki (id: prafulla_mendki)

> 40) Dhananjayan Brahma (id: abhanaya)

> 41) Dhanapal Logic

> 42) Bhaskar

> 43) Ash (KAS)

> 44) Chandrahari

> 45) Manoj Kumar (id: mouji99)

>

> Love and regards,

> Sreenadh

>

> , " Sre_eram "

> sreeram64@ wrote:

> >

> > Namaste,

> >

> > It is time that we upgrade some of the members who have been in the

> > group for considerable time and shared their knowledgebase with all

> > others - hence forth these member's messages would be UNMODERATED.

> >

> > 1) Bhaskar

> > 2) Sheevani,

> > 3) Shanmukha

> > 4) Shankar Bharadwaj

> > 5) Arjun Pandit

> > 6) Gopi

> > 7) Anita

> > 8)

> >

> > Any negative or adverse remarks made by them should be read and

> > attributed to those individuals posting the message than to the

group

> > itself. We presume that the individuals are matured and take

> > responsibilities for their postings. Any deviation or violation to

> > good group etiquette would ensure that the messages or membership

> would

> > be back to original status of being moderated. Depending upon the

> > nature of transgression of good behavior, the member may even be

> banned.

> >

> > A word of suggestion to Members who are in the list - take time to

> post

> > your messages and ensure the sensitivities of the group or

individuals

> > are adequately taken care. Personal differences if any be limited to

> > the subject itself. In NO case, they should extend the boundaries

> > beyond the subject thread. Personal attacks are strictly NOT

> ALLOWED.

> > If members are interested in Personal attacks they are advised to do

> the

> > same OFFLINE.

> >

> > The groups motto has always been

> >

> > 1. Let the best logic win the discussion and debate

> > 2. Show your age in being polite in your messages

> > 3. Show your prowess in your astro_content

> > 4. Show your maturity in your judgment of planets, nakshatras,

> > signs...etc. (than judging individual member's conduct or behavior

> !!)

> > 5. All school of astro_thoughts are encouraged

> > 6. All are free to disagree

> > 7. There are NO gurus in the group....other than the original

> RISHIS

> > themselves who gave us the greatest or superior wisdom in the

subject

> of

> > astrology

> > 8. Every new member should give his own astro_introduction so that

> > others can appreciate it - School of thought, Jyotish Teacher/Guru

> (to

> > all of us, there is NONE in the current recent history who can be

> given

> > the title of GURU ....for they all utmost qualify - Jyotish Teacher)

> > 9. Every known astrologer has his own contribution to the subject

> and

> > are respected in the group irrespective of their background and

other

> > vices

> > 10. Let us GROW old than getting OLD !!

> >

> > Help us to become a matured group.

> >

> > A word of thanks to Neelam ji for giving us the idea and she

deserves

> > immense credit for the time she spent in the group sharing her

> energetic

> > inputs.

> >

> > With regards,

> > Sreeram_Srinivas

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Bhaskar ji and all, In the Database section of the group there is a table with the name Our Group Members where every group member can present their introduction. The details of about 48 members are already available there. I request every one to visit this section of the group and input their information - if they wish to do so. Certainly as Bhaskar ji puts it, that would be helpful to everyone.//if the unmoderated members are able to put their contact details// The answer is ye, it is possible. And every member can do it at: Our Group Members of the group. Love and regards,Sreenadh , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> > Dear sirs,> > I am not sure but it would also be helpful if the unmoderated members> are able to put their contact details in the Files section, so that we> know that we are conversing with real people. They need not mention> their Phone numbers if they wish not to, but could at same time give as> much info as could seem authentic and dependable.> > regards/Bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

Dear Bhaskar ji, //In a Kings court one person always has better advantages> and can reach even the inner corridors and can talk whenever he wants> and whatever he wants like Birbal, or like a court jester. This man is> normally allowed to get away with many atrocities he commits in name of> "Wiseness" or "Humour".// This was very true in many cases in this group and very very true in your case many times as you already know. //I hope I am treated in this manner so that I can maintain my natural flow without apprehensions.// It was so till now, but it won't be now onwards. Ha...Ha... Now you are grown-up, mature and did GREW Old (and NOT getting OLD) as Srinivas ji puts it, you have a better responsibility of handling things and not committing atrocity. It is better to use thief to watch the thief. So we are depending on you to keep the group calm, under control and centered on astro discussions devoid of all atrocity. Ha..Ha... In our home we are responsible, in our group we should be. But ofcourse you should follow your natural flow - but have a rethought always before posting - because you are more responsible now. Love and Hugs,Sreenadh , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> > Dear Sreenadh ji,> > Great. Now this will become like a Court and a garden where many can> communicate as and when they want and responses can come immediately.> this is also good for those like me who sleep late at night and I have> nobody to talk to (Since my wife is asleep when I am awake). Those> members who are awake at night can converse freely.> > Another point. In a Kings court one person always has better advantages> and can reach even the inner corridors and can talk whenever he wants> and whatever he wants like Birbal, or like a court jester. This man is> normally allowed to get away with many atrocities he commits in name of> "Wiseness" or "Humour". I hope I am treated in this manner so that I can> maintain my natural flow without apprehensions.> > Your take now.> > love and regards,> > Bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadh ji,

Okay Got it. So I am still going to be like a devil, but in garb of a saint.

HaHaHa.

Bhaskar.

, "sreesog" <sreesog wrote:>> Dear Bhaskar ji,> //In a Kings court one person always has better advantages> > and can reach even the inner corridors and can talk whenever he wants> > and whatever he wants like Birbal, or like a court jester. This man is> > normally allowed to get away with many atrocities he commits in name> of> > "Wiseness" or "Humour".//> This was very true in many cases in this group and very very true in> your case many times as you already know. []> //I hope I am treated in this manner so that I can maintain my natural> flow without apprehensions.//> It was so till now, but it won't be now onwards. Ha...Ha... [>] > [)] Now you are grown-up, mature and did GREW Old (and NOT getting> OLD) as Srinivas ji puts it, you have a better responsibility of> handling things and not committing atrocity. [] It is better to> use thief to watch the thief. So we are depending on you to keep the> group calm, under control and centered on astro discussions devoid of> all atrocity. [] Ha..Ha... In our home we are responsible, in our> group we should be. [] But ofcourse you should follow your natural> flow - but have a rethought always before posting - because you are more> responsible now. []> Love and Hugs,> Sreenadh> > , "Bhaskar"> bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:> >> >> > Dear Sreenadh ji,> >> > Great. Now this will become like a Court and a garden where many can> > communicate as and when they want and responses can come immediately.> > this is also good for those like me who sleep late at night and I have> > nobody to talk to (Since my wife is asleep when I am awake). Those> > members who are awake at night can converse freely.> >> > Another point. In a Kings court one person always has better> advantages> > and can reach even the inner corridors and can talk whenever he wants> > and whatever he wants like Birbal, or like a court jester. This man is> > normally allowed to get away with many atrocities he commits in name> of> > "Wiseness" or "Humour". I hope I am treated in this manner so that I> can> > maintain my natural flow without apprehensions.> >> > Your take now.> >> > love and regards,> >> > Bhaskar.>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenath ji,

 

I am happy to read this list.

 

Regards,

A.V.Pathi,

 

 

 

gopalakrishna <gopi_b927 Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 7:04:33 AM Re: Members_Upgraded - updated list of UN-MODERATED members

Dear Sreenadh ji,wow,so many...great.Love and regards,gopi.ancient_indian_ astrology, "sreesog" <sreesog wrote:>> Dear All,> The updated list of UN-MODERATED members are given below. I request> them to be more careful in their conversations, since there is none to > moderate them except themselves. We consider them as responsible mature> members.> > 1) GOPI> 2) Shankar Bhardwaj> 3) Anita> 4) K Gopu> 5) Shanmukha> 6) (id: gaurav.ghosh)> 7) Axeplex (Dev!)> 8) Pandit Arjun> 9) Sheevani> 10) Deepak Sharma> 11) Girish Menon> 12) Vishnu Mohan> 13) Santosh> 14) Sarajit Poddar (id: sarajitp)> 15) Phyillis Chubb (id: pchubb03)> 16) Finn Wandahl (id: finn_wandahl)> 17) Ernst Wilhelm (id: ERNSTW )> 18) Sanjay Rath (id:

srath)> 19) PVR Narasimha Raho (id: pvr108)> 20) Vijayadas Pradeep> 21) Kiran Rama> 22) Kishore Patnaik> 23) Chakraborty> 24) Satya Prakash> 25) Sunil Bhattacharjya> 26) Vinita Kumar> 27) Vijay Goel> 28) Dhanapal T> 29) Panditji (id: doctorketkar)> 30) Renu (id: renunw)> 31) Chiranjiv Mehta> 32) Sairam Nat (id: sairaman53)> 33) Ramesh Mishra (id: aarceemastro2002)> 33) Col. Chandran (id: colchandran)> 34) M S Bohar (id: msbohra62)> 35) Satpal Khurana (id: khurana_satpal)> 36) Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj (id: nirbhar)> 37) SC Kursija> 38) Liana Sandru (id: blulisan)> 39) prafulla Vaman Mendki (id: prafulla_mendki)> 40) Dhananjayan Brahma (id: abhanaya)> 41) Dhanapal Logic> 42) Bhaskar> 43) Ash (KAS)> 44) Chandrahari> 45) Manoj Kumar (id: mouji99)> > Love

and regards,> Sreenadh> > ancient_indian_ astrology, "Sre_eram"> sreeram64@ wrote:> >> > Namaste,> >> > It is time that we upgrade some of the members who have been in the> > group for considerable time and shared their knowledgebase with all> > others - hence forth these member's messages would be UNMODERATED.> >> > 1) Bhaskar> > 2) Sheevani,> > 3) Shanmukha> > 4) Shankar Bharadwaj> > 5) Arjun Pandit> > 6) Gopi> > 7) Anita> > 8) > >> > Any negative or adverse remarks made by them should be read and> > attributed to those individuals posting the message than to the group> > itself. We presume that the individuals are matured and take> > responsibilities for their postings. Any deviation or

violation to> > good group etiquette would ensure that the messages or membership> would> > be back to original status of being moderated. Depending upon the> > nature of transgression of good behavior, the member may even be> banned.> >> > A word of suggestion to Members who are in the list - take time to> post> > your messages and ensure the sensitivities of the group or individuals> > are adequately taken care. Personal differences if any be limited to> > the subject itself. In NO case, they should extend the boundaries> > beyond the subject thread. Personal attacks are strictly NOT> ALLOWED.> > If members are interested in Personal attacks they are advised to do> the> > same OFFLINE.> >> > The groups motto has always been> >> > 1. Let the best logic win the discussion

and debate> > 2. Show your age in being polite in your messages> > 3. Show your prowess in your astro_content> > 4. Show your maturity in your judgment of planets, nakshatras,> > signs...etc. (than judging individual member's conduct or behavior> !!)> > 5. All school of astro_thoughts are encouraged> > 6. All are free to disagree> > 7. There are NO gurus in the group....other than the original> RISHIS> > themselves who gave us the greatest or superior wisdom in the subject> of> > astrology> > 8. Every new member should give his own astro_introduction so that> > others can appreciate it - School of thought, Jyotish Teacher/Guru > (to> > all of us, there is NONE in the current recent history who can be> given> > the title of GURU ....for they all utmost qualify - Jyotish Teacher)> >

9. Every known astrologer has his own contribution to the subject> and> > are respected in the group irrespective of their background and other> > vices> > 10. Let us GROW old than getting OLD !!> >> > Help us to become a matured group.> >> > A word of thanks to Neelam ji for giving us the idea and she deserves> > immense credit for the time she spent in the group sharing her> energetic> > inputs.> >> > With regards,> > Sreeram_Srinivas> >>

[Guest guest]

Dear Pathi ji, This list will always remain incomplete and more and more names would gets added to it, and may be some names gets removed from this list (i.e. put under moderation) if some unpleasant conversation violating group etiquette spring-up. This list can also be noted for some of the very knowledgeable members NOT included in the list, due to various reasons. I am listing some sample names below -1) Vinay Jha, Hari Malla : Due to their voilent explosions, stand points.2) Venkatachala Pathi, GK Goel : So that the moderators can edit-out the contact address from their mails.3) Madhav (id: vrajleela), Shobhana MS (id: sobhana_ms), Durga Parameswari (id: durga050) : We don't know much about them.4) Madhu Nair, HP Vijaya Narasimha Pakka, Bhagavati Hariharan, RK Dash (They are no more much active in this group and un-d due to mysterious reasons. We would love to have them back in this group) Ofcourse it won't be right to close this mail without expressing thanks to the hundreds of active AIA group members who either participate in discussions or regularly read the mails. I am certain that our family will grow - 1) With the entry of numerous new members 2) By minor individual differences between knowledgeable members and non-members evaporating. Please pardon me for not including numerous deserving names into this list - that will happen gradually I hope.Love and regards,Sreenadh , venkatachala pathi <pathiav wrote:>> Dear Sreenath ji,> > I am happy to read this list.> > Regards,> > A.V.Pathi

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenath ji,

 

I, certainly, did not respond to remind you to include my name in the list, as I am aware and I self-assess my 'standings' among those listed by you. Now, you had also given the reason as to why I am 'omitted' in that list of your august eminent Astrologers, who can 'involve' without moderation in your group, is fully justified and I graciously understand. Sorry, I took your time on this.

 

Please continue to 'moderate' my mail, if ever, I send to this group.

 

Regards to you and all your members, listed and unlisted, as ever from me,

A.V.Pathi,

 

 

 

sreesog <sreesog Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 10:53:53 AM Re: Members_Upgraded - updated list of UN-MODERATED members

Dear Pathi ji, This list will always remain incomplete and more and more names would gets added to it, and may be some names gets removed from this list (i.e. put under moderation) if some unpleasant conversation violating group etiquette spring-up. This list can also be noted for some of the very knowledgeable members NOT included in the list, due to various reasons. I am listing some sample names below -1) Vinay Jha, Hari Malla : Due to their voilent explosions, stand points.2) Venkatachala Pathi, GK Goel : So that the moderators can edit-out the contact address from their mails.3) Madhav (id: vrajleela), Shobhana MS (id: sobhana_ms), Durga Parameswari (id: durga050) : We don't know much about them.4) Madhu Nair, HP Vijaya Narasimha Pakka, Bhagavati Hariharan, RK Dash (They are no more much active in this group and un-d due to mysterious reasons. We would love to have them back in this group) Ofcourse it won't be right to close this mail without expressing thanks to the hundreds of active AIA group members who either participate in discussions or regularly read the mails. I am certain that our family will grow - 1) With the entry of numerous new members 2) By minor individual differences between knowledgeable members and non-members evaporating. Please pardon me for not including numerous

deserving names into this list - that will happen gradually I hope.Love and regards,Sreenadh ancient_indian_ astrology, venkatachala pathi <pathiav wrote:>> Dear Sreenath ji,> > I am happy to read this list.> > Regards,> > A.V.Pathi

[Guest guest]

Thanks Sreenadhji,

 

I have updated my information in the

database as per your suggestion.

 

Regards

 

Santhosh

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of sreesog

Sunday, December 06, 2009

12:24 PM

 

Subject:

Re: Members_Upgraded - updated list of UN-MODERATED

members

 

 

 

 

 

Dear All,

The updated list of UN-MODERATED

members are given below. I request them to be more careful in their

conversations, since there is none to moderate them except

themselves. We consider them as responsible mature members.

 

1) GOPI

2) Shankar Bhardwaj

3) Anita

4) K Gopu

5) Shanmukha

6) (id: gaurav.ghosh)

7) Axeplex (Dev!)

8) Pandit Arjun

9) Sheevani

10) Deepak Sharma

11) Girish Menon

12) Vishnu Mohan

13) Santosh

14) Sarajit Poddar (id: sarajitp)

15) Phyillis Chubb (id: pchubb03)

16) Finn Wandahl (id: finn_wandahl)

17) Ernst Wilhelm (id: ERNSTW )

18) Sanjay Rath (id: srath)

19) PVR Narasimha Raho (id: pvr108)

20) Vijayadas Pradeep

21) Kiran Rama

22) Kishore Patnaik

23) Chakraborty

24) Satya Prakash

25) Sunil Bhattacharjya

26) Vinita Kumar

27) Vijay Goel

28) Dhanapal T

29) Panditji (id: doctorketkar)

30) Renu (id: renunw)

31) Chiranjiv Mehta

32) Sairam Nat (id: sairaman53)

33) Ramesh Mishra (id: aarceemastro2002)

33) Col. Chandran (id: colchandran)

34) M S Bohar (id: msbohra62)

35) Satpal Khurana (id: khurana_satpal)

36) Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj (id: nirbhar)

37) SC Kursija

38) Liana Sandru (id: blulisan)

39) prafulla Vaman Mendki (id: prafulla_mendki)

40) Dhananjayan Brahma (id: abhanaya)

41) Dhanapal Logic

42) Bhaskar

43) Ash (KAS)

44) Chandrahari

45) Manoj Kumar (id: mouji99)

 

Love and regards,

Sreenadh

 

,

" Sre_eram " <sreeram64 wrote:

>

> Namaste,

>

> It is time that we upgrade some of the members who have been in the

> group for considerable time and shared their knowledgebase with all

> others - hence forth these member's messages would be UNMODERATED.

>

> 1) Bhaskar

> 2) Sheevani,

> 3) Shanmukha

> 4) Shankar Bharadwaj

> 5) Arjun Pandit

> 6) Gopi

> 7) Anita

> 8)

>

> Any negative or adverse remarks made by them should be read and

> attributed to those individuals posting the message than to the group

> itself. We presume that the individuals are matured and take

> responsibilities for their postings. Any deviation or violation to

> good group etiquette would ensure that the messages or membership would

> be back to original status of being moderated. Depending upon the

> nature of transgression of good behavior, the member may even be banned.

>

> A word of suggestion to Members who are in the list - take time to post

> your messages and ensure the sensitivities of the group or individuals

> are adequately taken care. Personal differences if any be limited to

> the subject itself. In NO case, they should extend the boundaries

> beyond the subject thread. Personal attacks are strictly NOT ALLOWED.

> If members are interested in Personal attacks they are advised to do the

> same OFFLINE.

>

> The groups motto has always been

>

> 1. Let the best logic win the discussion and debate

> 2. Show your age in being polite in your messages

> 3. Show your prowess in your astro_content

> 4. Show your maturity in your judgment of planets, nakshatras,

> signs...etc. (than judging individual member's conduct or behavior !!)

> 5. All school of astro_thoughts are encouraged

> 6. All are free to disagree

> 7. There are NO gurus in the group....other than the original RISHIS

> themselves who gave us the greatest or superior wisdom in the subject of

> astrology

> 8. Every new member should give his own astro_introduction so that

> others can appreciate it - School of thought, Jyotish Teacher/Guru (to

> all of us, there is NONE in the current recent history who can be given

> the title of GURU ....for they all utmost qualify - Jyotish Teacher)

> 9. Every known astrologer has his own contribution to the subject and

> are respected in the group irrespective of their background and other

> vices

> 10. Let us GROW old than getting OLD !!

>

> Help us to become a matured group.

>

> A word of thanks to Neelam ji for giving us the idea and she deserves

> immense credit for the time she spent in the group sharing her energetic

> inputs.

>

> With regards,

> Sreeram_Srinivas

>

 

 

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 9.0.709 / Virus Database: 270.14.96/2549 - Release 12/07/09 01:07:00

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadh ji,

I assure you that i will try my best to prove myself according to your expectations.

Love and Regards--- On Sun, 12/6/09, venkatachala pathi <pathiav wrote:

venkatachala pathi <pathiav Re: Members_Upgraded - updated list of UN-MODERATED members Date: Sunday, December 6, 2009, 3:31 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Sreenath ji,

 

I am happy to read this list.

 

Regards,

A.V.Pathi,

 

 

 

gopalakrishna <gopi_b927 Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 7:04:33 AM Re: Members_Upgraded - updated list of UN-MODERATED members

Dear Sreenadh ji,wow,so many...great.Love and regards,gopi.ancient_indian_ astrology, "sreesog" <sreesog wrote:>> Dear All,> The updated list of UN-MODERATED members are given below. I request> them to be more careful in their conversations, since there is none to > moderate them except themselves. We consider them as responsible mature> members.> > 1) GOPI> 2) Shankar Bhardwaj> 3) Anita> 4) K Gopu> 5) Shanmukha> 6) (id: gaurav.ghosh)> 7) Axeplex (Dev!)> 8) Pandit Arjun> 9) Sheevani> 10) Deepak Sharma> 11) Girish Menon> 12) Vishnu Mohan> 13) Santosh> 14) Sarajit Poddar (id: sarajitp)> 15) Phyillis Chubb (id: pchubb03)> 16) Finn Wandahl (id: finn_wandahl)> 17) Ernst Wilhelm (id: ERNSTW )> 18) Sanjay Rath

(id: srath)> 19) PVR Narasimha Raho (id: pvr108)> 20) Vijayadas Pradeep> 21) Kiran Rama> 22) Kishore Patnaik> 23) Chakraborty> 24) Satya Prakash> 25) Sunil Bhattacharjya> 26) Vinita Kumar> 27) Vijay Goel> 28) Dhanapal T> 29) Panditji (id: doctorketkar)> 30) Renu (id: renunw)> 31) Chiranjiv Mehta> 32) Sairam Nat (id: sairaman53)> 33) Ramesh Mishra (id: aarceemastro2002)> 33) Col. Chandran (id: colchandran)> 34) M S Bohar (id: msbohra62)> 35) Satpal Khurana (id: khurana_satpal)> 36) Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj (id: nirbhar)> 37) SC Kursija> 38) Liana Sandru (id: blulisan)> 39) prafulla Vaman Mendki (id: prafulla_mendki)> 40) Dhananjayan Brahma (id: abhanaya)> 41) Dhanapal Logic> 42) Bhaskar> 43) Ash (KAS)> 44) Chandrahari> 45) Manoj Kumar (id: mouji99)> >

Love and regards,> Sreenadh> > ancient_indian_ astrology, "Sre_eram"> sreeram64@ wrote:> >> > Namaste,> >> > It is time that we upgrade some of the members who have been in the> > group for considerable time and shared their knowledgebase with all> > others - hence forth these member's messages would be UNMODERATED.> >> > 1) Bhaskar> > 2) Sheevani,> > 3) Shanmukha> > 4) Shankar Bharadwaj> > 5) Arjun Pandit> > 6) Gopi> > 7) Anita> > 8) > >> > Any negative or adverse remarks made by them should be read and> > attributed to those individuals posting the message than to the group> > itself. We presume that the individuals are matured and take> > responsibilities for their postings. Any deviation

or violation to> > good group etiquette would ensure that the messages or membership> would> > be back to original status of being moderated. Depending upon the> > nature of transgression of good behavior, the member may even be> banned.> >> > A word of suggestion to Members who are in the list - take time to> post> > your messages and ensure the sensitivities of the group or individuals> > are adequately taken care. Personal differences if any be limited to> > the subject itself. In NO case, they should extend the boundaries> > beyond the subject thread. Personal attacks are strictly NOT> ALLOWED.> > If members are interested in Personal attacks they are advised to do> the> > same OFFLINE.> >> > The groups motto has always been> >> > 1. Let the best logic win the

discussion and debate> > 2. Show your age in being polite in your messages> > 3. Show your prowess in your astro_content> > 4. Show your maturity in your judgment of planets, nakshatras,> > signs...etc. (than judging individual member's conduct or behavior> !!)> > 5. All school of astro_thoughts are encouraged> > 6. All are free to disagree> > 7. There are NO gurus in the group....other than the original> RISHIS> > themselves who gave us the greatest or superior wisdom in the subject> of> > astrology> > 8. Every new member should give his own astro_introduction so that> > others can appreciate it - School of thought, Jyotish Teacher/Guru > (to> > all of us, there is NONE in the current recent history who can be> given> > the title of GURU ....for they all utmost qualify - Jyotish

Teacher)> > 9. Every known astrologer has his own contribution to the subject> and> > are respected in the group irrespective of their background and other> > vices> > 10. Let us GROW old than getting OLD !!> >> > Help us to become a matured group.> >> > A word of thanks to Neelam ji for giving us the idea and she deserves> > immense credit for the time she spent in the group sharing her> energetic> > inputs.> >> > With regards,> > Sreeram_Srinivas> >>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreenadh jiThank youRegardsGirish--- On Mon, 12/7/09, S.C. Kursija <sckursija wrote:S.C. Kursija <sckursijaRe: Re: Members_Upgraded - updated list of UN-MODERATED members Date: Monday, December 7, 2009, 10:46 PM

 

 

Dear Sreenadh ji,

I assure you that i will try my best to prove myself according to your expectations.

Love and Regards--- On Sun, 12/6/09, venkatachala pathi <pathiav > wrote:

venkatachala pathi <pathiav >[ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Members_Upgraded - updated list of UN-MODERATED membersancient_indian_ astrologySunday, December 6, 2009, 3:31 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Sreenath ji,

 

I am happy to read this list.

 

Regards,

A.V.Pathi,

 

 

 

gopalakrishna <gopi_b927 >ancient_indian_ astrologySun, December 6, 2009 7:04:33 AM[ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Members_Upgraded - updated list of UN-MODERATED members

Dear Sreenadh ji,wow,so many...great.Love and regards,gopi.ancient_indian_ astrology, "sreesog" <sreesog wrote:>> Dear All,> The updated list of UN-MODERATED members are given below. I request> them to be more careful in their conversations, since there is none to > moderate them except themselves. We consider them as responsible mature> members.> > 1) GOPI> 2) Shankar Bhardwaj> 3) Anita> 4) K Gopu> 5) Shanmukha> 6) (id: gaurav.ghosh)> 7) Axeplex (Dev!)> 8) Pandit Arjun> 9) Sheevani> 10) Deepak Sharma> 11) Girish Menon> 12) Vishnu Mohan> 13) Santosh> 14) Sarajit Poddar (id: sarajitp)> 15) Phyillis Chubb (id: pchubb03)> 16) Finn Wandahl (id: finn_wandahl)> 17) Ernst Wilhelm (id: ERNSTW )> 18) Sanjay Rath

(id: srath)> 19) PVR Narasimha Raho (id: pvr108)> 20) Vijayadas Pradeep> 21) Kiran Rama> 22) Kishore Patnaik> 23) Chakraborty> 24) Satya Prakash> 25) Sunil Bhattacharjya> 26) Vinita Kumar> 27) Vijay Goel> 28) Dhanapal T> 29) Panditji (id: doctorketkar)> 30) Renu (id: renunw)> 31) Chiranjiv Mehta> 32) Sairam Nat (id: sairaman53)> 33) Ramesh Mishra (id: aarceemastro2002)> 33) Col. Chandran (id: colchandran)> 34) M S Bohar (id: msbohra62)> 35) Satpal Khurana (id: khurana_satpal)> 36) Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj (id: nirbhar)> 37) SC Kursija> 38) Liana Sandru (id: blulisan)> 39) prafulla Vaman Mendki (id: prafulla_mendki)> 40) Dhananjayan Brahma (id: abhanaya)> 41) Dhanapal Logic> 42) Bhaskar> 43) Ash (KAS)> 44) Chandrahari> 45) Manoj Kumar (id: mouji99)> >

Love and regards,> Sreenadh> > ancient_indian_ astrology, "Sre_eram"> sreeram64@ wrote:> >> > Namaste,> >> > It is time that we upgrade some of the members who have been in the> > group for considerable time and shared their knowledgebase with all> > others - hence forth these member's messages would be UNMODERATED.> >> > 1) Bhaskar> > 2) Sheevani,> > 3) Shanmukha> > 4) Shankar Bharadwaj> > 5) Arjun Pandit> > 6) Gopi> > 7) Anita> > 8) > >> > Any negative or adverse remarks made by them should be read and> > attributed to those individuals posting the message than to the group> > itself. We presume that the individuals are matured and take> > responsibilities for their postings. Any deviation

or violation to> > good group etiquette would ensure that the messages or membership> would> > be back to original status of being moderated. Depending upon the> > nature of transgression of good behavior, the member may even be> banned.> >> > A word of suggestion to Members who are in the list - take time to> post> > your messages and ensure the sensitivities of the group or individuals> > are adequately taken care. Personal differences if any be limited to> > the subject itself. In NO case, they should extend the boundaries> > beyond the subject thread. Personal attacks are strictly NOT> ALLOWED.> > If members are interested in Personal attacks they are advised to do> the> > same OFFLINE.> >> > The groups motto has always been> >> > 1. Let the best logic win the

discussion and debate> > 2. Show your age in being polite in your messages> > 3. Show your prowess in your astro_content> > 4. Show your maturity in your judgment of planets, nakshatras,> > signs...etc. (than judging individual member's conduct or behavior> !!)> > 5. All school of astro_thoughts are encouraged> > 6. All are free to disagree> > 7. There are NO gurus in the group....other than the original> RISHIS> > themselves who gave us the greatest or superior wisdom in the subject> of> > astrology> > 8. Every new member should give his own astro_introduction so that> > others can appreciate it - School of thought, Jyotish Teacher/Guru > (to> > all of us, there is NONE in the current recent history who can be> given> > the title of GURU ....for they all utmost qualify - Jyotish

Teacher)> > 9. Every known astrologer has his own contribution to the subject> and> > are respected in the group irrespective of their background and other> > vices> > 10. Let us GROW old than getting OLD !!> >> > Help us to become a matured group.> >> > A word of thanks to Neelam ji for giving us the idea and she deserves> > immense credit for the time she spent in the group sharing her> energetic> > inputs.> >> > With regards,> > Sreeram_Srinivas> >>