Guest guest Posted December 15, 2009 Report Share Posted December 15, 2009 Dear Santosh ji and Rohini Ranjan ji; Sleekha ji has translated this as follows; He is a renowned Lalkitab Scholar. the translation may be like this a) The Indian Astrology is not related to planets of universe, infact this system defines or identifies the energy existing points of every natural(living) and unnatural (non living) units. The planets of universe are also identified by this system only, that's why it seems to be similar to study of planet of universe. " 1. Bharat mein grahon ka jyotishiye jyan saurmandal ke grahon se sambhandhit nahin hai, apitu ek aisa sidhanth hai, jisme yeh bataya gaya hai ki kissi bhi prakrtik - aprakritik ikkayion me balrekhaon se bane oorja uttsarjan bindu kaun kaun hain. Saurmandal ke grahon ki pehchan bhi isi sidhant ke tahat ki gayi, isliye inme samanta pratit hoti hai. a) Any of these units which are known by the name of planets generate different type of energies. And the shape and characteristics of that particular unit is based on the quality of that particular energy. 2. kissi bhi ikkayi mein grah ke naam se jaane wale in 9 binduon se bhin bhin prakar ki oorja-trange uttpan hoti hain. us ikkayi ki aakriti avam uski gun-pravartiyan in hi trango ke gunnatamak samikaran par nirbhar karti hai. a) In lal kitab the table in which things related to planets (grehon se sambandhit vastuyen) have been shown, in on the basis of this theory only. 4. Lalkitab mein grahon ki vastyon ki sarini inhi tarango ki sthiti ko pehchankar banayi gayi hai, " " . Regards, Leekha Regards Kubir Bains , " Santhosh " <santhosh wrote: > > Dear Kulbirji, > > > > Why I said wow is because this has been my absolute personal view too. > > > > However, the problem I haven't been able to reconcile is the whole > calculation is based on actual movement of the said planets and not any > imaginary periods of orbits. Well again this is my assumption that they are > the same and I have not cross-checked so a member may correct me in this > regard. > > > > Regards and Thanks > > Santhosh > > > > > > _____ > > > On Behalf Of kulbir > Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:57 PM > > Re: Venus and Jupiter > > > > > > Dear Santhosh ji; Yes, You are absolutely right. > Regards. > Kulbir Bains. > > ancient_indian_ <%40> > astrology , santhosh@ wrote: > > > > Wow kulbirji, > > Am not very good in literature hindi. But the essense i got is, what we > talk about in charts as planets are not the same as the planets in solar > system and that they are certain kinds of energy's and the names of planets > are symbolic representations. Am i right so far? > > Regards > > Santhosh > > > > Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel > > > > > > " kulbir " <kulbirbains@> > > Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:09:07 > > <ancient_indian_ <%40> > astrology > > > Re: Venus and Jupiter > > > > Sir, //it sounds like a fascinating blend of jyotish and tantra // > > Pt Chandra Muni Pathak has an interesting note in his commentary on > lalkitab; i don't know how to translate it into English so i am putting it > as such in Romanised Hindi; > > " " 1. Bharat mein grahon ka jyotishiye jyan saurmandal ke grahon se > sambhandhit nahin hai, apitu ek aisa sidhanth hai, jisme yeh bataya gaya hai > ki kissi bhi prakrtik - aprakritik ikkayion me balrekhaon se bane oorja > uttsarjan bindu kaun kaun hain. Saurmandal ke grahon ki pehchan bhi isi > sidhant ke tahat ki gayi, isliye inme samanta pratit hoti hai. > > 2. kissi bhi ikkayi mein grah ke naam se jaane wale in 9 binduon se bhin > bhin prakar ki oorja-trange uttpan hoti hain. us ikkayi ki aakriti avam uski > gun-pravartiyan in hi trango ke gunnatamak samikaran par nirbhar karti hai. > > 3. inhi tarango ko bharat mein devi devta ke naam se bhi jaana jata hai. > > 4. Lalkitab mein grahon ki vastyon ki sarini inhi tarango ki sthiti ko > pehchankar banayi gayi hai, " " . > > > > Regards > > Kulbir Bains. > > > > ancient_indian_ <%40> > astrology , " rohinicrystal " <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > > > Kulbir jee, > > > > > > Thanks for your response. Much apprecited! > > > > > > RR_, > > > > > > ancient_indian_ > <%40> > astrology , " kulbir " <kulbirbains@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Sir, > > > > Lalkitb comprises of 5 books > > > > 1. Samudrik Ki Lalkitab Ke Farmaan, published in 1939 AD; > > > > 2. Samudrik Ki Lalkitab Ke Armaan, published in 1940 AD: > > > > 3. Lalkitab Teesra Hissa published, in 1941 AD: > > > > 4. Lalkitab Tarmeemshuda published, in 1942 AD; > > > > 5. Ilm-e Samudrik ki buniyad par jyotish ki Lalkitab published in 1952 > AD. > > > > The books have photograph of Pt. Sharma Girdhari Lal; resident of > Pharwala depicting him as printer and publisher and the name of Shri Aatma > Ram Sharma resident of Tehsil Noorpur; District Kangra is mentioned as Katib > ( calighrapher, composer script-writter). > > > > The books were printed at Jahaazi Press, Lahore and contact address > mentioned is of Calcutta Photo Shop; Amritsar; Calcutta Photo Shop; > Dharmshala; Kangra. Calcutta Photo Shop. > > > > The author of these books is Pt. Rup Chand Joshi son of Shri Jyoti Ram > Joshi resident of Village Pharwala, District Jalandhar; Punjab; Date of > birth 18-01-1898; or 10-5-1898; Pt. Ji served in Defense accounts and > retired as Assistant Accounts officer. He was posted at different places in > India e.g Lahore, Dharamshal, Bombay, Madras, Ambala, Shimla. During his > service tenure. He expired on 24-12-1982. > > > > Pt. Girdhari lal Sharma ji and Pt Rup Chand joshi ji were first > cousins. > > > > These books were written in Urdu script and published in a small > number. Over the years English and hindi took the centre stage, pushing Urdu > into oblivion. Some translations appeared in 1990's in hindi but had many > many mistakes; The 1952 edition's translation caught fancy of every one who > laid his eyes on it and it further let to ignorance about other 4 editions. > > > > Regards > > > > Kulbir Bains. > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ > <%40> > astrology , " rohinicrystal " <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Kulbir jee, > > > > > > > > > > I am a new member here and although familiar with jyotish for a > while now, came to learn about 'lal kitab' only a few years ago and it > sounds like a fascinating blend of jyotish and tantra. I think a scanned > copy exists on Lulu.com uploaded by J. Dhindsa jee. Sorry, I do not have a > specific URL. And I am not sure which EDITION this one was. Was the 1940 > edition the original one? I hope I am not bothering you and wasting your > time with my naive questions. Perhaps I should google -- one of these days! > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ > <%40> > astrology , " kulbir " <kulbirbains@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ms. Neelam ji; Since it comes from 1940 edition; not many > practitioners / professionals know about it; they generally consult 52, 42 > and 41 editions; 1939 and 1940 editions have not received that much interest > and henceforth importance. I am just a novice in this field so i have no > data to support; my knowledge is only of academic interest. > > > > > > Whenever i come across a practical application; i will surely > share it with you. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Kulbir Bains. > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ > <%40> > astrology , neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Kulbir ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for sharing the dictums of Lal Kitab. It would be > interesting to > > > > > > > have some examples to show the application/working to make it > more > > > > > > > understandable and meaningful. > > > > > > > Would be grateful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > Neelam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/12/14 kulbir <kulbirbains@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ms. Neelam ji; lalkitab says 1)- When Sun or Jupiter are in > house no. 5, if > > > > > > > > then enemy planets of Sun or Jupiter occupy the throne i.e > house no. 1, then > > > > > > > > GENERALLY the child in the womb of mother will be a girl > (mercury); There > > > > > > > > will be health related complications which will end with the > birth of such > > > > > > > > girl child. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However if the child in the womb of mother is a male then the > enemy planets > > > > > > > > in house no 1. will consider it as Sun and will treat it as > such; the life > > > > > > > > or death of such male child will de determined by the degree > of conflict > > > > > > > > with such enemy planet/s in house no.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)- When Sun or Jupiter are in house no. 1 if then enemy > planets of Sun or > > > > > > > > Jupiter occupy the house no. 5.; then GENERALLY the child in > the womb of > > > > > > > > mother will be a girl; There will be health related > complications which will > > > > > > > > end with the death of such girl child. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is from page 197-198 of Lalkitab Armaan 1940 edition; > > > > > > > > i will try to write a note about progeny qua Jupiter in house > no.5; there > > > > > > > > are some really interesting observations in other editions; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This i quoted because of reference of girl child and Jupiter 5 > mention. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Kulbir Bains. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ > <%40> > astrology <%40>, > > > > > > > > neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Anita ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > //guru in fifth causes daughters to be born in most of the > cases.// > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it just a hearsay or your observation? Some astrologers > have been > > > > > > > > > propagating baseless myths like Karako Bhav Nashaye and > Bhava Hani Karo > > > > > > > > > Jeeva, etc. Several researches done at BVB have proved their > fallacy > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > any doubt. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > Neelam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/12/14 Anita R <ash.rsh55@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr.Mehta, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the clarification. Especially the second > part.As far as I > > > > > > > > heard > > > > > > > > > > more than problems arising as far begetting children , > guru in fifth > > > > > > > > causes > > > > > > > > > > daughters to be born in most of the cases. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Anita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Mon, 14/12/09, chiranjiv mehta <vchiranjiv@>* > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chiranjiv mehta <vchiranjiv@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: Venus and > Jupiter > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ > <%40> > astrology <%40> > > > > > > > > > > Monday, 14 December, 2009, 8:38 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First born begetting will be problemetic. The > person/native will be > > > > > > > > under > > > > > > > > > > Jupiterian influence first. Child next. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chiranjiv Mehta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Mon, 14/12/09, Anita R <ash.rsh55 >* > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anita R <ash.rsh55 > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Venus and > Jupiter > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > > > > > > > > > Monday, 14 December, 2009, 1:47 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Deepenji, > > > > > > > > > > Just a thought. If Ju as the 12th lord signifying all that > you said > > > > > > > > lord > > > > > > > > > > and as 9th lord of the natural zodiac signifying > guru,dharma etcc, is > > > > > > > > > > situated in 5th house, another dharma house signifying > children, would > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > make the person religious / spiritual or will it make the > first born > > > > > > > > > > religious / spiritual? Some how, I think it will make both > the the > > > > > > > > parent > > > > > > > > > > and the child religious and spiritual. What do you say? > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Anita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Sun, 13/12/09, deepen thakkar <justcoolout@ > >* wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deepen thakkar <justcoolout@ > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Venus and > Jupiter > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > > > > > > > > > Sunday, 13 December, 2009, 7:14 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manoj ji > > > > > > > > > > pisces is the place where the Rishis reside ,its the place > of ultimate > > > > > > > > > > knowledge ,calm and serene , jupiter doesnt like it as > compared to > > > > > > > > dhanus > > > > > > > > > > rashi bcoz he likes to do the day to day religious work > ,looking after > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > temple,giving offerings ,pujas ,anushthans and yagyas > ,also the > > > > > > > > > > administration work which makes jupiter more happy than > the ownership > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > pisces that is moksha sthana .... > > > > > > > > > > the combo you are referring with aries ascendant and 12th > house venus > > > > > > > > is in > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek Bacchans chart ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Sun, 13/12/09, Manoj Chandran <chandran_manoj@ > >* > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manoj Chandran <chandran_manoj@ > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Venus and > Jupiter > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > > > > > > > > > Sunday, 13 December, 2009, 9:36 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Deep Ji, Vidya Ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Very nice thoughts from Deep Ji, but, unfortunately Pisces > is not a > > > > > > > > totally > > > > > > > > > > Pious sign of Jupiter. Infact it is the " negative " sign of > Jupiter and > > > > > > > > THAT > > > > > > > > > > is one of the primary reasons Venus is exalted there. I > have seen many > > > > > > > > > > charts with Aries rising, Venus in Pisces with Low SAV/BAV > have deviant > > > > > > > > > > sexual behaviour (ofcourse with other afflictions) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > -Manoj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > ** Vidya <vidyakmr > > > > > > > > > > > *To:* ancient_indian_ astrology > > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Sun, December 13, 2009 8:13:11 AM > > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Venus and > Jupiter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Deep Ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are such a wise man..Where did you learn that? It was > so beautiful > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > way you put it. Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, deepen > thakkar > > > > > > > > > > <justcoolout@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus is the love god and is always interested in  > uniting 2 souls > > > > > > > > > > that too unconditionally so he finds himself exalted in > pisces ,where > > > > > > > > pisces > > > > > > > > > > is deep end of ocean ,the " garbha " of true knowledge and > also 2 fishes > > > > > > > > > > signify the union of 2 souls ...The true union between 2 > souls can only > > > > > > > > > > occur if both of them are understanding, patient and pious > which are > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > prime charectiristics of Guru , while finds itself in > debility in virgo > > > > > > > > bcoz > > > > > > > > > > it is an upachay sthana and mecury as an immature student > is always > > > > > > > > asking > > > > > > > > > > for moree and finding faults with his learning attitude > while jupiter > > > > > > > > is the > > > > > > > > > > one who know that all knowledge lies beneath itself and he > has to not > > > > > > > > roam > > > > > > > > > > around to find true knowledge.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Besides tht please pray on my behalf in Khwaja ji's > Darbar and may > > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > Rehmat be upon us for always.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > deep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 13/12/09, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ ...> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Venus and > Jupiter > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology > > > > > > > > > > > Sunday, 13 December, 2009, 10:59 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May be the relationship is different for the two signs! > Jupiter takes > > > > > > > > > > fiery and watery domains whereas Shukra rules over earth > and air! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's a Libra shukra multiplying the sagi fires and > there's a > > > > > > > > Piscean > > > > > > > > > > Guru nurturing the taurus earth (3/11 relationships) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Clubbing Tau-sagi and Pisc-Lib, we might get into > challenging > > > > > > > > > > situations!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > Neelam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/12/13 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course, I do not consider them as inimical. I spoke > about the > > > > > > > > general > > > > > > > > > > considerations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards/Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology, > neelam gupta > > > > > > > > > > <neelamgupta07@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Samdhees? That's interesting! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They're said to be Samdharmees (as per Laghu > Parashari). Being both > > > > > > > > > > great > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > benefics do they club together for a cause? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, we cannot say they're both inimical to > each other. No > > > > > > > > > > planet is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > inimical to GURU. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Neelam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/12/13 rohinicrystal <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear B. Bhai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They are 'samdhees!' :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was never about Shukra or Brihaspati, but their > children who > > > > > > > > were > > > > > > > > > > sent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > over to meet and got married! Of course I could be > entirely > > > > > > > > wrong! > > > > > > > > > > What do I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know? ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ancient_indian_ astrology@ . > com<ancient_ > > > > > > > > indian_ > > > > > > > > > > astrology%40gr oups. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is said that Venus-Shukracharya is Guru of the > evil asuras. > > > > > > > > And > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter is Dev Guru. So are they inimical to each > other ? If so > > > > > > > > > > then why > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does Venus get Exalted in Pisces in sign of > Jupiter ? > > > > > > > > Combination > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus-Jupiter is considered to be one of the best > when > > > > > > > > unafflcited, > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhautik sukh as well as Parlokik sukha (Material > Life happiness > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thereafter). Then why are they still considered in > enemy camps > > > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will not be available for the day now, going to > have darshan > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pushkar and Ajmer-Khwajaji both. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards/Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your > Homepage. > > > > > > > > http://in.. > > > > > > > > > > com/ <http://in.. <http://in./> com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your > Homepage< > > > > > > > > http://in.rd. > <http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http:/in./> > /tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your > Homepage< > > > > > > > > http://in.rd. > <http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http:/in./> > /tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your > Homepage< > > > > > > > > http://in.rd. > <http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http:/in./> > /tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./> > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your > Homepage< > > > > > > > > http://in.rd. > <http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http:/in./> > /tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./> > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.716 / Virus Database: 270.14.108/2565 - Release 12/15/09 > 01:10:00 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.