Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Shvapalit v/s Vishnupalit [A Study]

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

 

I came across this below intersting research study, thougt of sharing here.

Please do provide your valuable inputs.

 

extracted from:

http://chiraan.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/shivapalit-vs-vishnupalit-a-study/

 

 

Once a great astrologer came up with a great concept that, the world is divided

into two

 

types of people

 

Shivapalit jataka

 

Vishnu Palitha jataka

 

The learned man's contention was that Sun ,Moon ,Mars ,jupiter, form one group

[Vishnu palitha] And Venus Mercury and Saturn fall in another group [shiva

Palitha]

 

Lagnas belonging to Leo ,Cancer, Pisces, Sagittarius, Scorpio and Aries are

Vishnu Palita

 

Lagnas belonging to Gemini, Virgo, Taurus, Libra, Aquarius and Capricorn come

under Shiva Palita.

 

Shiva Palita are blessed with ample wealth luxuries and are inclined to material

world and happiness and pray Lord Shiva,Parvati,

Shakti, Bhairav etc

 

VishnuPalita jatakas are into gyana bhakti vairagya, intellectual pursuits,

struggling and poor.

 

If Shiva Palita is suffering and wants come out of his sufferrings He must

resort to Shaiva pooja only then he will get riches and fame, however hard he

tries to please \vishnu and other linked Deities he would never get results. So

such people if they want riches and fame

they should appease NOn Vaishnav dieties.

 

Similarly If Vishnu Palit Jataka are into sufferings dueto prarabdha, if by any

chance these are visting Shakti temples or Shiva Kshetras, these will never be

rewarded with results instead their sufferings will increase, But on the

contrary if they resort to VIshnu

aradhana, they will prosper instantly.

 

Shiva Palita jatakas have chakras risisng from mooladhara to Sahasrar Vishnu

Palita jataka has flow of chakras [ energy ] from Sahasrar to Moolesha.

 

It was an interesting research although but I did not find any supportive

testimony to accept it, neither did the gentleman tried to give one. But He was

so firm in his belief, that just at a look at the horoscope he would ask the

people to discontinue their Vishnu

aradhana or Shiva Aradhana.

 

His belief fortified when a person serving in Mantralayam with Vishnu mantra

japa for 12 years could not get success and went to this astrologer, he said you

are Mithuna lagna Rayaru will not listen to you You must resort to Panchakshari,

He accepted his words and

suddenly next year he accomplished his desire and thanked the

astrologer and went away to his native.

 

Second came a Vedanti he was practising intense Yoga , But could not enter the

Sahasrar for as many as five years he could not enter sahasrar and his energies

would lapse back into mooladhar as he forced his way to Sahasrar. The astrologer

said, you are Vishnu palita

your mode of practise is wrong, Go perform Hanuman seva for 48 days , you will

enter Sahasrar. He agreed and then he was successful.

 

All these and several other cases made him believe intensely in the theory.

 

***

 

So I thought to give it a study.

 

The basis would render a simple division of humanity into two parts, just on the

basis of Lagna.

 

Not acceptable as there are many Vishnu bhaktas with lagna in Mithuna or

vrishabha kumbha, and they are intensely devotional. Although they may not be

completely detached.

 

Secondly what about those whose Shaiva lagnas are aspected by Vishnu palita

grahas, and vice versa

 

We do not get any explanation, as this should render people to resort to both

upasanas.

 

The research can be more termed as success in Upasanas of a person NO text

attributes upasana to lagna

 

Upasana is studied from fifth house, twelfth house

 

Upasana is studied from Amatya karaka .

 

Also from fifth from Atma karaka.

 

Upasana is also studied from Vimsamsa and chaturvimsamsa.

 

The research can also be termed as teaming of deva paksha with Rakshas paksha,

Jupiter as Dev Guru and and Shukra as Daitya guru.

 

Here too Planets friendly with Jupiter are termed as Dev and Venus group is

malefic

 

Malefics in Puranas are known to resort to Shiva and never to Vishnu

 

But attaining this distinction on mere Lagna ownership cannot be justified

because - that would render all malefic owned Lagnas ineffective for VIshnu

Bhakti and vice versa.

 

This research makes sense but where to draw distinction is only difficult but

definitely lagna in rashi cannot form such distinction.

 

Let us examine some alternates.

 

The Navamsa in the horoscope is divided into Deva, manushya and Rakshasa

category

 

But I have found most devoted also coming under the Rakshsas category in

navamsa. So Navamsa while can say which root the soul belongs to, but cannot

declare him to be anti Shiva or anti Vaishnav, as Prahlad being Rakshasa was a

known Vishnu devotee. Jayant a devta has gone

against Ram.

 

The drekkana gives three distinction of NArada, Agastya and Doorvasa, denoting,

bhakti yoga,

 

gnyana yoga and karma yoga.

 

Here distinction of Shiva and Vishnu palita cannot be achieved by mere means of

sadhana The Akshavedaamsa gives the distinction of jataka on the basis of

Vishnu, Shiva and Bramha. but all shaiva bhaktas did not show their lagna

falling under shiva Nor did Vishnu Bhaktas had their lagnas falling under Vishnu

amsa. Bramha amsa is an addition here.

 

By far this is the closest in accepting the theory but theory need modification

and has to take into account the fact that humanity can be divided into

 

Vishnu palit

Bramha Palit

Shiva Palit

 

But the onus of distinction should lie with choosing one among the Lagna,

sun[atma], Moon, Atma karaka, And other special lagna. the one with most

strength.

 

Finally Parashar muni says there are four types of people based on lagna,

Uttama, Madhyam, Adhama and Udaseena. this is based on planets in udayarashi.

 

Shodashamsa divides lagna into Bramha , Vishnu SHiva and Surya amsha .

Shodashamsha is more conerned with happiness of the People.

 

The learned should take this as just a study and not as conclusive or

affirmative.

 

Regards

Chandu2Chill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...